Calsyn D A, Wells E A, Saxon A J, Jackson T R, Wrede A F, Stanton V, Fleming C
Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Seattle, USA.
J Addict Dis. 1994;13(3):47-63. doi: 10.1300/j069v13n03_05.
In a 3 x 2 factorial design, 360 new admissions to methadone maintenance were randomly assigned to one of three levels of counseling: (1) "medication only," (2) "standard" counseling, and (3) "enhanced" services; and one of two contingency contracting conditions: (1) no contingencies (NC), and (2) contingency contracting (CC). Contingency contracting included discharge for continuous positive urines; subsequently CC subjects were discharged at a greater rate than the NC group. However, CC subjects were more likely to be readmitted. NC subjects provided more urines positive for any illicit drug use than did CC subjects. For opiate positives a significant level of counseling by contingency contracting interaction was found with medication only/CC subjects obtaining fewer opiate positives than medication only/NC subjects. The impact of reduced or enhanced services and of contingency contracting will not be fully understood until longer term follow-up (18 and 24 month) is completed. Results suggest that contingency management procedures could be utilized in settings offering minimum services (e.g., "interim methadone") to achieve treatment outcomes similar to programs offering standard counseling services.
在一项3×2析因设计中,360名新接受美沙酮维持治疗的患者被随机分配到三种咨询水平之一:(1)“仅药物治疗”,(2)“标准”咨询,以及(3)“强化”服务;以及两种应急契约条件之一:(1)无应急情况(NC),和(2)应急契约(CC)。应急契约包括因连续尿样呈阳性而出院;随后,CC组患者的出院率高于NC组。然而,CC组患者再次入院的可能性更大。NC组患者尿样中检测出任何非法药物呈阳性的比例高于CC组。对于阿片类药物呈阳性的情况,发现仅药物治疗/CC组患者的阿片类药物阳性结果少于仅药物治疗/NC组患者,存在显著的咨询与应急契约交互作用水平。在完成更长时间的随访(18个月和24个月)之前,减少或强化服务以及应急契约的影响将无法得到充分理解。结果表明,应急管理程序可用于提供最低限度服务的环境(例如,“临时美沙酮”),以实现与提供标准咨询服务的项目类似的治疗效果。