González-Rozada Martín
Department of Economics, Universidad Torcuato Di Tella, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Universidad Torcuato Di Tella, Buienos Aires, Argentina.
Tob Control. 2020 Nov;29(Suppl 5):s300-s303. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-055238. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
The literature on policies for the control of the tobacco epidemic suggests that increasing excise taxes on the consumption of tobacco products is the most cost-effective policy. Cigarette tax structure in Argentina is very complex. All the tax bases for cigarette consumption taxes are related and, therefore, any modification of a tax affects the collection of the rest of the taxes. This is important given that funds raised by one of the taxes, the Special Tobacco Fund (FET), are allocated among the tobacco provinces according to the value of tobacco production. These provinces oppose in the congress to any reform that increase taxes on cigarette consumption that negatively affects these funds. In May 2016, the government decided to increase the rate of one of the taxes, the internal tax, from 60% to 75%. We study the impact on cigarettes' demand price elasticity, consumption and tax revenues of this tobacco tax reform. Using an Error Correction Model, we estimate short-run and long-run demand price and income elasticities. We find that the tax reform of May 2016 induced an increase in the magnitude, in absolute value, of the short-run demand price elasticity and at the same time increased the funds collected by the FET. We simulate the effects of the tax reform over the government revenues and per-capita consumption of cigarettes showing that additional increments in taxes would increase revenues and diminish consumption of cigarettes.
关于烟草流行控制政策的文献表明,提高烟草制品消费税是最具成本效益的政策。阿根廷的香烟税收结构非常复杂。香烟消费税的所有税基都是相关的,因此,任何一项税收的调整都会影响其他税种的征收。鉴于其中一项税收——特别烟草基金(FET)所筹集的资金是根据烟草生产价值在烟草种植省份之间分配的,这一点就显得尤为重要。这些省份在国会中反对任何会增加香烟消费税从而对这些资金产生负面影响的改革。2016年5月,政府决定将其中一项税收——国内税的税率从60%提高到75%。我们研究了这项烟草税改革对香烟需求价格弹性、消费量和税收收入的影响。我们使用误差修正模型估计了短期和长期的需求价格弹性和收入弹性。我们发现,2016年5月的税收改革导致短期需求价格弹性的绝对值增大,同时增加了FET筹集的资金。我们模拟了税收改革对政府收入和人均香烟消费量的影响,结果表明,进一步提高税收将增加收入并减少香烟消费。