• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阿根廷近期烟草税改革的影响。

Impact of a recent tobacco tax reform in Argentina.

作者信息

González-Rozada Martín

机构信息

Department of Economics, Universidad Torcuato Di Tella, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Universidad Torcuato Di Tella, Buienos Aires, Argentina.

出版信息

Tob Control. 2020 Nov;29(Suppl 5):s300-s303. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-055238. Epub 2020 Aug 25.

DOI:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-055238
PMID:32843501
Abstract

The literature on policies for the control of the tobacco epidemic suggests that increasing excise taxes on the consumption of tobacco products is the most cost-effective policy. Cigarette tax structure in Argentina is very complex. All the tax bases for cigarette consumption taxes are related and, therefore, any modification of a tax affects the collection of the rest of the taxes. This is important given that funds raised by one of the taxes, the Special Tobacco Fund (FET), are allocated among the tobacco provinces according to the value of tobacco production. These provinces oppose in the congress to any reform that increase taxes on cigarette consumption that negatively affects these funds. In May 2016, the government decided to increase the rate of one of the taxes, the internal tax, from 60% to 75%. We study the impact on cigarettes' demand price elasticity, consumption and tax revenues of this tobacco tax reform. Using an Error Correction Model, we estimate short-run and long-run demand price and income elasticities. We find that the tax reform of May 2016 induced an increase in the magnitude, in absolute value, of the short-run demand price elasticity and at the same time increased the funds collected by the FET. We simulate the effects of the tax reform over the government revenues and per-capita consumption of cigarettes showing that additional increments in taxes would increase revenues and diminish consumption of cigarettes.

摘要

关于烟草流行控制政策的文献表明,提高烟草制品消费税是最具成本效益的政策。阿根廷的香烟税收结构非常复杂。香烟消费税的所有税基都是相关的,因此,任何一项税收的调整都会影响其他税种的征收。鉴于其中一项税收——特别烟草基金(FET)所筹集的资金是根据烟草生产价值在烟草种植省份之间分配的,这一点就显得尤为重要。这些省份在国会中反对任何会增加香烟消费税从而对这些资金产生负面影响的改革。2016年5月,政府决定将其中一项税收——国内税的税率从60%提高到75%。我们研究了这项烟草税改革对香烟需求价格弹性、消费量和税收收入的影响。我们使用误差修正模型估计了短期和长期的需求价格弹性和收入弹性。我们发现,2016年5月的税收改革导致短期需求价格弹性的绝对值增大,同时增加了FET筹集的资金。我们模拟了税收改革对政府收入和人均香烟消费量的影响,结果表明,进一步提高税收将增加收入并减少香烟消费。

相似文献

1
Impact of a recent tobacco tax reform in Argentina.阿根廷近期烟草税改革的影响。
Tob Control. 2020 Nov;29(Suppl 5):s300-s303. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-055238. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
2
Analysis of cigarette demand in Argentina: the impact of price changes on consumption and government revenues.阿根廷香烟需求分析:价格变化对消费及政府税收的影响。
Salud Publica Mex. 2017 Jan-Feb;59(1):95-101. doi: 10.21149/7861.
3
Who pays the most cigarette tax in Turkey.在土耳其谁缴纳的香烟税最多。
Tob Control. 2016 Jan;25(1):39-45. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051639. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
4
Are lower income smokers more price sensitive?: the evidence from Korean cigarette tax increases.低收入吸烟者对价格更敏感吗?:来自韩国香烟税上调的证据。
Tob Control. 2016 Mar;25(2):141-6. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051680. Epub 2014 Nov 27.
5
Income and cigarette price responsiveness: evidence from Vietnam.收入与香烟价格的敏感性:来自越南的证据。
Tob Control. 2022 Sep;31(Suppl 2):s152-s157. doi: 10.1136/tc-2022-057584. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
6
The effect of taxation on tobacco consumption and public revenues in Lebanon.黎巴嫩税收对烟草消费和公共收入的影响。
Tob Control. 2015 Jan;24(1):77-81. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050703. Epub 2013 Jun 20.
7
Tobacco excise tax increase and illicit cigarette consumption: evidence from Vietnam.提高烟草消费税与非法香烟消费:来自越南的证据。
Tob Control. 2020 Oct;29(Suppl 4):s275-s280. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-055301. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
8
The price sensitivity of cigarette consumption in Bangladesh: evidence from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Bangladesh Wave 1 (2009) and Wave 2 (2010) Surveys.孟加拉国香烟消费的价格敏感性:来自国际烟草控制(ITC)孟加拉国第一轮(2009年)和第二轮(2010年)调查的证据。
Tob Control. 2014 Mar;23 Suppl 1(0 1):i39-47. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050835. Epub 2013 Oct 8.
9
Smoking prevention that increases tax revenue: tobacco taxes in the Czech Republic 2004-2020.增加税收的控烟措施:2004-2020 年捷克共和国的烟草税。
Cent Eur J Public Health. 2023 Jun;31(2):83-89. doi: 10.21101/cejph.a7507.
10
Effectiveness of tax policy changes in Montenegro: smoking behaviour by socio-economic status.黑山税收政策变化的效果:按社会经济地位划分的吸烟行为。
Tob Control. 2022 Sep;31(Suppl 2):s124-s132. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-056876. Epub 2022 Mar 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Cross-country and panel data estimates of the price elasticity of demand for cigarettes in Europe.欧洲香烟需求价格弹性的跨国和面板数据估计。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jun 16;13(6):e069970. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069970.
2
On the impacts of higher tobacco taxes in Argentina: a computable general equilibrium approach.关于提高阿根廷烟草税的影响:一种可计算一般均衡方法。
Tob Control. 2024 Jun 4;33(Suppl 2):s115-s121. doi: 10.1136/tc-2022-057725.
3
How does tobacco growing impact advancement in demand reduction measures?烟草种植如何影响减少需求措施的进展?
Tob Prev Cessat. 2021 Feb 1;7:7. doi: 10.18332/tpc/132596. eCollection 2021.