Neuroscience Center & Clinical Trial and Research Center for Stroke, Department of Neurology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Xinmin Street, Chang Chun, Jilin, 130021, China.
Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Neuroradiology. 2021 Jan;63(1):17-25. doi: 10.1007/s00234-020-02530-9. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
Endovascular treatment (EVT) has been widely used for treating acute ischemic stroke (AIS). However, the safety and efficacy of treating AIS with tirofiban combined with EVT remain controversial. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate this treatment. Randomized controlled trials and cohort studies that compared treatment with tirofiban combined with EVT and EVT alone were included in our meta-analysis. Those published from inception to March 31, 2020, were searched using the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. Safety was assessed based on symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) incidence and 3-month mortality. Efficacy was assessed based on modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores at 3 months post-EVT and recanalization rates. Data were analyzed using either the random-effects or fixed-effects model based on the heterogeneity of studies. In total, one RCT, six prospective studies, and four retrospective studies (2387 AIS cases) were assessed. Our meta-analysis showed that tirofiban combined with EVT did not increase sICH risk (RR, 1.06; 95%CI, 0.79 to 1.42; P = 0.72) and 3-month mortality (RR, 0.87; 95%CI, 0.74 to 1.04; P = 0.12). Recanalization rates were not significantly different between patients treated with tirofiban combined with EVT and those treated with EVT alone (RR, 1.04; 95%CI, 1.00 to 1.08; P = 0.07), but tirofiban combined with EVT was significantly associated with favorable functional outcomes (mRS score, 0-2) in AIS patients (RR, 1.13; 95%CI, 1.02 to 1.25; P = 0.02). Tirofiban combined with EVT appears to be safe and potentially effective in treating AIS.
血管内治疗 (EVT) 已广泛用于治疗急性缺血性脑卒中 (AIS)。然而,替罗非班联合 EVT 治疗 AIS 的安全性和疗效仍存在争议。因此,我们进行了一项荟萃分析来评估这种治疗方法。我们的荟萃分析纳入了比较替罗非班联合 EVT 与单独 EVT 治疗的随机对照试验和队列研究。我们使用 PubMed、Web of Science、Embase 和 Cochrane Library 数据库检索了从研究开始到 2020 年 3 月 31 日发表的研究。安全性评估基于症状性颅内出血 (sICH) 发生率和 3 个月死亡率。疗效评估基于 EVT 后 3 个月改良 Rankin 量表 (mRS) 评分和再通率。根据研究的异质性,使用随机效应或固定效应模型对数据进行分析。共有 1 项 RCT、6 项前瞻性研究和 4 项回顾性研究(2387 例 AIS 病例)纳入了我们的荟萃分析。我们的荟萃分析显示,替罗非班联合 EVT 并未增加 sICH 风险(RR,1.06;95%CI,0.79 至 1.42;P = 0.72)和 3 个月死亡率(RR,0.87;95%CI,0.74 至 1.04;P = 0.12)。替罗非班联合 EVT 与单独 EVT 治疗的患者之间再通率没有显著差异(RR,1.04;95%CI,1.00 至 1.08;P = 0.07),但替罗非班联合 EVT 与 AIS 患者的良好功能结局(mRS 评分 0-2)显著相关(RR,1.13;95%CI,1.02 至 1.25;P = 0.02)。替罗非班联合 EVT 似乎在治疗 AIS 方面是安全且有效的。