• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

替罗非班用于大动脉粥样硬化性卒中病因的急性缺血性卒中患者血管内治疗的安全性和有效性

Safety and Efficacy of Tirofiban for Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients With Large Artery Atherosclerosis Stroke Etiology Undergoing Endovascular Therapy.

作者信息

Huo Xiaochuan, Wang Anxin, Mo Dapeng, Gao Feng, Ma Ning, Wang Yilong, Wang Yongjun, Miao Zhongrong

机构信息

Neurointervention Center, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Front Neurol. 2021 Feb 11;12:630301. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.630301. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fneur.2021.630301
PMID:33643207
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7905208/
Abstract

To investigate the safety and efficacy of tirofiban in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with large artery atherosclerosis (LAA) stroke etiology receiving endovascular therapy (EVT). In this multi-center prospective study, patients who were considered to have an indication received a low dose intra-arterial bolus (0.25-1 mg) of tirofiban. The safety and efficacy outcomes at 90-day follow-ups included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), recanalization rate, functional outcome, and mortality. Among the 649 AIS patients with LAA, those in the tirofiban group ( = 244) showed higher systolic blood pressure (BP) and NIHSS score on admission, puncture-to-recanalization time, lower frequency of intravenous thrombolysis and intra-arterial thrombolysis, higher frequency of antiplatelet, heparinization, mechanical stent retrieval, aspiration, balloon angioplasty, and more retrieval times compared with those in the non-tirofiban group ( = 405) (all < ). Tirofiban was found to be associated with superior clinical outcomes in anterior circulation stroke and major stroke patients [adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 2.163, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.130-4.140, = and adjusted OR = 2.361, 95% CI = 1.326-4.202, = , respectively] and a lower risk of mortality at 90-day follow-ups (adjusted OR = 0.159, 95% CI = 0.042-0.599, = and adjusted OR = 0.252, 95% CI = 0.103-0.621, = , respectively). There was no significant difference in sICH between the two groups. Tirofiban in AIS patients with LAA undergoing EVT is safe and may benefit the functional outcomes in anterior circulation and major stroke patients and showed a trend for reduced mortality.

摘要

探讨替罗非班在接受血管内治疗(EVT)的大动脉粥样硬化(LAA)性病因急性缺血性卒中(AIS)患者中的安全性和有效性。在这项多中心前瞻性研究中,被认为有适应证的患者接受低剂量动脉内推注(0.25 - 1毫克)替罗非班。90天随访时的安全性和有效性结局包括症状性颅内出血(sICH)、再通率、功能结局和死亡率。在649例LAA性AIS患者中,替罗非班组(n = 244)与非替罗非班组(n = 405)相比,入院时收缩压(BP)和美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分更高,穿刺至再通时间更长,静脉溶栓和动脉内溶栓频率更低,抗血小板、肝素化、机械取栓、抽吸、球囊血管成形术频率更高,取栓次数更多(均P < )。发现替罗非班与前循环卒中及大面积卒中患者的更好临床结局相关[校正比值比(OR)= 2.163,95%置信区间(CI)= 1.130 - 4.140,P = 及校正OR = 2.361,95% CI = 1.326 - 4.202,P = ,分别],且90天随访时死亡风险更低(校正OR = 0.159,95% CI = 0.042 - 0.599,P = 及校正OR = 0.252,95% CI = 0.103 - 0.621,P = ,分别)。两组间sICH无显著差异。接受EVT的LAA性AIS患者使用替罗非班是安全的,可能使前循环和大面积卒中患者的功能结局受益,并显示出降低死亡率的趋势。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fb8/7905208/34a53e650e19/fneur-12-630301-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fb8/7905208/03053c5e22d4/fneur-12-630301-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fb8/7905208/34a53e650e19/fneur-12-630301-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fb8/7905208/03053c5e22d4/fneur-12-630301-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fb8/7905208/34a53e650e19/fneur-12-630301-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Safety and Efficacy of Tirofiban for Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients With Large Artery Atherosclerosis Stroke Etiology Undergoing Endovascular Therapy.替罗非班用于大动脉粥样硬化性卒中病因的急性缺血性卒中患者血管内治疗的安全性和有效性
Front Neurol. 2021 Feb 11;12:630301. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.630301. eCollection 2021.
2
Association of tirofiban with improvement of functional outcomes of direct thrombectomy for acute anterior circulation occlusion: a retrospective, nonrandomized, multicenter, real-world study.替罗非班与直接机械取栓治疗急性前循环闭塞患者功能结局改善的相关性:一项回顾性、非随机、多中心、真实世界研究。
Neurosurg Focus. 2023 Oct;55(4):E21. doi: 10.3171/2023.7.FOCUS23150.
3
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of adjunctive use of tirofiban in patients treated with endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke at different embolic sites.系统评价和荟萃分析替罗非班辅助治疗不同栓塞部位急性缺血性脑卒中血管内治疗的疗效和安全性。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Oct 6;102(40):e35091. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000035091.
4
Safety and efficacy of tirofiban combined with endovascular treatment in acute ischaemic stroke.替罗非班联合血管内治疗在急性缺血性脑卒中中的安全性和有效性。
Eur J Neurol. 2019 Aug;26(8):1105-1110. doi: 10.1111/ene.13946. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
5
Effects of Periprocedural Tirofiban vs. Oral Antiplatelet Drug Therapy on Posterior Circulation Infarction in Patients With Acute Intracranial Atherosclerosis-Related Vertebrobasilar Artery Occlusion.围手术期替罗非班与口服抗血小板药物治疗对急性颅内动脉粥样硬化相关椎基底动脉闭塞患者后循环梗死的影响
Front Neurol. 2020 Apr 15;11:254. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00254. eCollection 2020.
6
Efficacy and safety of tirofiban combined with endovascular therapy for basilar artery occlusion stroke due to large artery atherosclerosis.替罗非班联合血管内治疗大动脉粥样硬化性基底动脉闭塞性卒中的疗效及安全性。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2024 Feb;33(2):107526. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2023.107526. Epub 2023 Dec 13.
7
Meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of tirofiban in patients with acute ischaemic stroke undergoing mechanical thrombectomy.替罗非班治疗急性缺血性脑卒中机械取栓患者的疗效及安全性的 Meta 分析。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2023 May;228:107702. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2023.107702. Epub 2023 Mar 28.
8
Low-Dose Tirofiban Improves Functional Outcome in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Treated With Endovascular Thrombectomy.低剂量替罗非班改善接受血管内血栓切除术治疗的急性缺血性中风患者的功能预后。
Stroke. 2017 Dec;48(12):3289-3294. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.019193. Epub 2017 Nov 10.
9
Continuous intravenous tirofiban can improve the 90-day functional outcome and decrease 90-day mortality without increasing bleeding risk in acute ischemic stroke patients treated by endovascular therapy: A meta-analysis.连续静脉注射替罗非班可改善血管内治疗的急性缺血性脑卒中患者 90 天的功能结局,降低 90 天死亡率,且不增加出血风险:一项荟萃分析。
J Clin Neurosci. 2022 May;99:109-116. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2022.03.008. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
10
Preoperative and intraoperative tirofiban during endovascular thrombectomy in large vessel occlusion stroke due to large artery atherosclerosis.大动脉粥样硬化所致大血管闭塞性卒中血管内血栓切除术中术前和术中替罗非班的应用。
Eur J Neurol. 2024 Oct;31(10):e16419. doi: 10.1111/ene.16419. Epub 2024 Jul 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of safety and efficacy of Tirofiban injection for treating acute ischemic stroke beyond standard time window.替罗非班注射液治疗超标准时间窗急性缺血性卒中的安全性及有效性评估
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 28;15(1):27399. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-11882-2.
2
Tirofiban Combination Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.替罗非班联合治疗急性缺血性卒中:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Brain Behav. 2025 Jun;15(6):e70508. doi: 10.1002/brb3.70508.
3
Targeted drug delivery systems for atherosclerosis.用于动脉粥样硬化的靶向给药系统。

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy and safety of tirofiban therapy in patients receiving endovascular treatment after large vessel ischaemic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis.替罗非班治疗大动脉缺血性脑卒中患者血管内治疗后的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Clin Neurosci. 2020 Oct;80:112-120. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2020.07.040. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
2
Safety and efficacy of tirofiban combined with endovascular therapy compared with endovascular therapy alone in acute ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis.替罗非班联合血管内治疗与单纯血管内治疗急性缺血性脑卒中的安全性和有效性的Meta 分析。
Neuroradiology. 2021 Jan;63(1):17-25. doi: 10.1007/s00234-020-02530-9. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
3
J Nanobiotechnology. 2025 Apr 23;23(1):306. doi: 10.1186/s12951-025-03384-0.
4
Efficacy and safety of tirofiban in acute ischemic stroke patients with ideal reperfusion: A cohort study of LAA and CE subgroups.替罗非班在实现理想再灌注的急性缺血性卒中患者中的疗效和安全性:LAA和CE亚组的队列研究
Eur J Neurol. 2025 Jan;32(1):e70034. doi: 10.1111/ene.70034.
5
Preoperative and intraoperative tirofiban during endovascular thrombectomy in large vessel occlusion stroke due to large artery atherosclerosis.大动脉粥样硬化所致大血管闭塞性卒中血管内血栓切除术中术前和术中替罗非班的应用。
Eur J Neurol. 2024 Oct;31(10):e16419. doi: 10.1111/ene.16419. Epub 2024 Jul 29.
6
The safety and efficacy of intra-arterial low-dose tirofiban administration during endovascular therapy in patients with large ischemic core volume.大缺血核心容积患者血管内治疗期间动脉内低剂量替罗非班给药的安全性和疗效。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 9;14(1):3353. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-53715-8.
7
Editorial: Mechanical thrombectomy and development of new devices: emerging trends in rescue strategies for failed mechanical thrombectomy.社论:机械取栓与新设备的研发:机械取栓失败后救援策略的新趋势
Front Neurol. 2023 Oct 4;14:1255953. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1255953. eCollection 2023.
8
The Efficacy and Safety of Tirofiban Use in Endovascular Thrombectomy for Intravenous Thrombolysis Applicable Patients with Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke-a Post Hoc Analysis from the Direct-MT Trial.替罗非班用于血管内血栓切除术治疗大血管闭塞性卒中静脉溶栓适用患者的疗效和安全性:来自 DIRECT-MT 试验的事后分析。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2024 Feb;47(2):208-215. doi: 10.1007/s00270-023-03540-9. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
9
Anticoagulation Options for Cranial Procedures: A Comparative Review of Aspirin, Plavix, and Aggrastat.颅脑手术的抗凝选择:阿司匹林、波立维与阿昔单抗的比较性综述
Cureus. 2023 Aug 22;15(8):e43899. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43899. eCollection 2023 Aug.
10
Tirofiban-induced thrombocytopenia.替罗非班诱导的血小板减少症。
Ann Med. 2023 Dec;55(1):2233425. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2023.2233425.
Safety and Efficacy of Tirofiban in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Receiving Endovascular Treatment: A Meta-Analysis.
替罗非班治疗急性缺血性脑卒中血管内治疗患者的安全性和有效性:一项荟萃分析。
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020;49(4):442-450. doi: 10.1159/000509054. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
4
Characteristic and prognosis of acute large vessel occlusion in anterior and posterior circulation after endovascular treatment: the ANGEL registry real world experience.血管内治疗后急性大血管闭塞在前循环和后循环中的特征和预后:ANGEL 注册真实世界研究经验。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2020 May;49(4):527-532. doi: 10.1007/s11239-020-02054-2.
5
Tirofiban for acute ischemic stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis.替罗非班治疗急性缺血性脑卒中:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2020 Apr;76(4):475-481. doi: 10.1007/s00228-019-02817-8. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
6
Safety and Efficacy of Tirofiban Combined With Mechanical Thrombectomy Depend on Ischemic Stroke Etiology.替罗非班联合机械取栓的安全性和有效性取决于缺血性卒中的病因。
Front Neurol. 2019 Oct 29;10:1100. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.01100. eCollection 2019.
7
Intravenous Administration of Standard Dose Tirofiban after Mechanical Arterial Recanalization is Safe and Relatively Effective in Acute Ischemic Stroke.机械性动脉再通后静脉注射标准剂量替罗非班在急性缺血性卒中中是安全且相对有效的。
Aging Dis. 2019 Oct 1;10(5):1049-1057. doi: 10.14336/AD.2018.0922. eCollection 2019 Oct.
8
Acute Ischaemic Stroke Cooperation Group of Endovascular Treatment (ANGEL) registry: study protocol for a prospective, multicentre registry in China.急性缺血性脑卒中血管内治疗合作组(ANGEL)注册研究:中国前瞻性多中心注册研究方案。
Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2019 Mar 19;4(1):57-60. doi: 10.1136/svn-2018-000188. eCollection 2019 Mar.
9
Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Receptor Inhibitor Tirofiban in Acute Ischemic Stroke.血小板糖蛋白 IIb/IIIa 受体抑制剂替罗非班治疗急性缺血性脑卒中。
Drugs. 2019 Apr;79(5):515-529. doi: 10.1007/s40265-019-01078-0.
10
Safety of Intra-Arterial Tirofiban Administration in Ischemic Stroke Patients after Unsuccessful Mechanical Thrombectomy.机械取栓失败后缺血性脑卒中患者动脉内注射替罗非班的安全性
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2019 Feb;30(2):141-147.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2018.08.021. Epub 2019 Jan 2.