• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

想象一个未来基层医疗咨询的人工智能文献助手:与全科医生的共同设计研究。

Envisioning an artificial intelligence documentation assistant for future primary care consultations: A co-design study with general practitioners.

机构信息

Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.

Faculty of Engineering & IT, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Nov 1;27(11):1695-1704. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa131.

DOI:10.1093/jamia/ocaa131
PMID:32845984
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7671614/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The study sought to understand the potential roles of a future artificial intelligence (AI) documentation assistant in primary care consultations and to identify implications for doctors, patients, healthcare system, and technology design from the perspective of general practitioners.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Co-design workshops with general practitioners were conducted. The workshops focused on (1) understanding the current consultation context and identifying existing problems, (2) ideating future solutions to these problems, and (3) discussing future roles for AI in primary care. The workshop activities included affinity diagramming, brainwriting, and video prototyping methods. The workshops were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Inductive thematic analysis of the transcripts of conversations was performed.

RESULTS

Two researchers facilitated 3 co-design workshops with 16 general practitioners. Three main themes emerged: professional autonomy, human-AI collaboration, and new models of care. Major implications identified within these themes included (1) concerns with medico-legal aspects arising from constant recording and accessibility of full consultation records, (2) future consultations taking place out of the exam rooms in a distributed system involving empowered patients, (3) human conversation and empathy remaining the core tasks of doctors in any future AI-enabled consultations, and (4) questioning the current focus of AI initiatives on improved efficiency as opposed to patient care.

CONCLUSIONS

AI documentation assistants will likely to be integral to the future primary care consultations. However, these technologies will still need to be supervised by a human until strong evidence for reliable autonomous performance is available. Therefore, different human-AI collaboration models will need to be designed and evaluated to ensure patient safety, quality of care, doctor safety, and doctor autonomy.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在从全科医生的角度了解未来人工智能(AI)文档助手在基层医疗咨询中的潜在作用,并确定其对医生、患者、医疗体系和技术设计的影响。

材料和方法

与全科医生进行共同设计研讨会。研讨会的重点是:(1)了解当前的咨询背景并确定现有问题;(2)针对这些问题提出未来的解决方案;(3)讨论 AI 在基层医疗中的未来作用。研讨会活动包括亲和图、头脑风暴和视频原型制作方法。研讨会进行了录音并逐字记录。对对话记录的转录进行了归纳主题分析。

结果

两位研究人员与 16 名全科医生共同主持了 3 次共同设计研讨会。出现了三个主要主题:专业自主权、人机协作和新的护理模式。在这些主题中确定了主要影响,包括:(1)由于完整咨询记录的持续记录和可访问性而引起的法律和医学方面的担忧;(2)未来的咨询将在一个分布式系统中在诊室之外进行,该系统涉及授权患者;(3)在任何未来的 AI 支持的咨询中,医患对话和同理心仍然是医生的核心任务;(4)质疑当前 AI 计划关注提高效率而不是患者护理的重点。

结论

AI 文档助手很可能成为未来基层医疗咨询的重要组成部分。然而,在有可靠的自主性能的强大证据之前,这些技术仍需要由人类进行监督。因此,需要设计和评估不同的人机协作模型,以确保患者安全、护理质量、医生安全和医生自主权。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de6d/7671614/5cdac5c450be/ocaa131f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de6d/7671614/5cdac5c450be/ocaa131f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de6d/7671614/5cdac5c450be/ocaa131f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Envisioning an artificial intelligence documentation assistant for future primary care consultations: A co-design study with general practitioners.想象一个未来基层医疗咨询的人工智能文献助手:与全科医生的共同设计研究。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Nov 1;27(11):1695-1704. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa131.
2
General Practitioners' Attitudes Toward Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Systems: Interview Study.全科医生对人工智能系统的态度:访谈研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jan 27;24(1):e28916. doi: 10.2196/28916.
3
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN MEDICAL PRACTICE: REGULATIVE ISSUES AND PERSPECTIVES.人工智能在医学实践中的应用:监管问题与展望。
Wiad Lek. 2020;73(12 cz 2):2722-2727.
4
An exploration of the attitudes and views of general practitioners on the use of video consultations in a primary healthcare setting: a qualitative pilot study.一项关于全科医生对在基层医疗环境中使用视频会诊的态度和观点的探索:一项定性试点研究。
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2019 Jan;20:e5. doi: 10.1017/S1463423618000361. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
5
Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Primary Care: Exploratory Qualitative Study of UK General Practitioners' Views.人工智能与初级医疗保健的未来:对英国全科医生观点的探索性定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Mar 20;21(3):e12802. doi: 10.2196/12802.
6
An Approach to Potentially Increasing Adoption of an Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Electronic Medical Record Encounter in Canadian Primary Care: Protocol for a User-Centered Design.一种提高加拿大初级保健中人工智能电子病历采用率的方法:一项以用户为中心的设计方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Jul 18;13:e54365. doi: 10.2196/54365.
7
A network model of activities in primary care consultations.初级保健咨询活动的网络模型。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 Oct 1;26(10):1074-1082. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz046.
8
Initial User-Centred Design of an AI-Based Clinical Decision Support System for Primary Care.基于人工智能的初级保健临床决策支持系统的初步以用户为中心的设计。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2024 Jan 25;310:1051-1055. doi: 10.3233/SHTI231125.
9
Multi-stakeholder preferences for the use of artificial intelligence in healthcare: A systematic review and thematic analysis.多利益相关方对人工智能在医疗保健中的应用的偏好:系统评价和主题分析。
Soc Sci Med. 2023 Dec;338:116357. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116357. Epub 2023 Nov 4.
10
Artificial intelligence technologies and compassion in healthcare: A systematic scoping review.医疗保健中的人工智能技术与人文关怀:一项系统综述。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 17;13:971044. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.971044. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding Clinician Perceptions of GenAI: A Mixed Methods Analysis of Clinical Documentation Tasks.了解临床医生对生成式人工智能的看法:临床文档任务的混合方法分析
J Med Syst. 2025 Aug 2;49(1):101. doi: 10.1007/s10916-025-02234-8.
2
AI Scribes in Health Care: Balancing Transformative Potential With Responsible Integration.医疗保健领域的人工智能抄写员:平衡变革潜力与负责任的整合
JMIR Med Inform. 2025 Aug 1;13:e80898. doi: 10.2196/80898.
3
Reclaiming clinical time: The promise and challenges of ambient AI for oncology nurses in the Asia-Pacific region.

本文引用的文献

1
Virtual primary care: fragmentation or integration?虚拟初级保健:碎片化还是整合?
Lancet Digit Health. 2019 Nov;1(7):e330-e331. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(19)30152-9.
2
Telehealth for global emergencies: Implications for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).远程医疗在全球突发事件中的应用:对 2019 冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的启示。
J Telemed Telecare. 2020 Jun;26(5):309-313. doi: 10.1177/1357633X20916567. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
3
How does medical scribes' work inform development of speech-based clinical documentation technologies? A systematic review.
夺回临床时间:亚太地区肿瘤护理中环境人工智能的前景与挑战
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2025 Jun 3;12:100737. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2025.100737. eCollection 2025 Dec.
4
Perceptions of, Barriers to, and Facilitators of the Use of AI in Primary Care: Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies.基层医疗中人工智能应用的认知、障碍与促进因素:定性研究的系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 25;27:e71186. doi: 10.2196/71186.
5
Stepwise considerations when using artificial intelligence tools for administrative tasks in primary care.在基层医疗中使用人工智能工具进行管理任务时的逐步考量。
Can Fam Physician. 2025 Jun;71(6):e90-e93. doi: 10.46747/cfp.7106e90.
6
Opportunities, challenges, and requirements for Artificial Intelligence (AI) implementation in Primary Health Care (PHC): a systematic review.初级卫生保健(PHC)中实施人工智能(AI)的机遇、挑战和要求:一项系统综述
BMC Prim Care. 2025 Jun 9;26(1):196. doi: 10.1186/s12875-025-02785-2.
7
Improving Clinical Documentation with Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review.利用人工智能改善临床文档记录:一项系统综述。
Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2024 Jun 1;21(2):1d. eCollection 2024 Summer-Fall.
8
Studying the Potential Effects of Artificial Intelligence on Physician Autonomy: Scoping Review.研究人工智能对医生自主性的潜在影响:范围综述
JMIR AI. 2025 Mar 13;4:e59295. doi: 10.2196/59295.
9
AI-Powered Clinical Documentation and Clinicians' Electronic Health Record Experience: A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.人工智能驱动的临床文档记录与临床医生的电子健康记录体验:一项非随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Sep 3;7(9):e2432460. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.32460.
10
Challenges and Facilitation Approaches for the Participatory Design of AI-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems: Protocol for a Scoping Review.基于人工智能的临床决策支持系统参与式设计的挑战和促进方法:系统评价方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Sep 5;13:e58185. doi: 10.2196/58185.
医疗转录员的工作如何为基于语音的临床文档技术的发展提供信息?系统评价。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 May 1;27(5):808-817. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa020.
4
Can mobile health apps replace GPs? A scoping review of comparisons between mobile apps and GP tasks.移动医疗应用程序能否替代全科医生?对移动应用程序与全科医生任务进行比较的范围综述。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Jan 6;20(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-1016-4.
5
Challenges of developing a digital scribe to reduce clinical documentation burden.开发数字抄写员以减轻临床文档负担的挑战。
NPJ Digit Med. 2019 Nov 22;2:114. doi: 10.1038/s41746-019-0190-1. eCollection 2019.
6
Artificial intelligence in primary care.基层医疗中的人工智能
Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Aug 29;69(686):422-423. doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X705137. Print 2019 Sep.
7
The "inconvenient truth" about AI in healthcare.关于医疗保健领域人工智能的“难以忽视的真相”。
NPJ Digit Med. 2019 Aug 16;2:77. doi: 10.1038/s41746-019-0155-4. eCollection 2019.
8
A network model of activities in primary care consultations.初级保健咨询活动的网络模型。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 Oct 1;26(10):1074-1082. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz046.
9
The digital scribe.数字记录员。
NPJ Digit Med. 2018 Oct 16;1:58. doi: 10.1038/s41746-018-0066-9. eCollection 2018.
10
Birmingham trust and Babylon Health discuss pre-A&E triage app.伯明翰信托基金与巴比伦健康公司讨论急诊前分诊应用程序。
BMJ. 2019 May 28;365:l2354. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l2354.