• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

移动医疗应用程序能否替代全科医生?对移动应用程序与全科医生任务进行比较的范围综述。

Can mobile health apps replace GPs? A scoping review of comparisons between mobile apps and GP tasks.

机构信息

School of Medicine, Walailak University, Thasala, Nakhon Si Thammarat, Thailand.

Walailak University Hospital, Thasala, Nakhon Si Thammarat, Thailand.

出版信息

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Jan 6;20(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-1016-4.

DOI:10.1186/s12911-019-1016-4
PMID:31906985
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6945711/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mobile health applications (mHealth apps) are increasingly being used to perform tasks that are conventionally performed by general practitioners (GPs), such as those involved in promoting health, preventing disease, diagnosis, treatment, monitoring, and support for health services. This raises an important question: can mobile apps replace GPs? This study aimed to systematically search for and identify mobile apps that can perform GP tasks.

METHODS

A scoping review was carried out. The Google Play Store and Apple App Store were searched for mobile apps, using search terms derived from the UK Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) guideline on GPs' core capabilities and competencies. A manual search was also performed to identify additional apps.

RESULTS

The final analysis included 17 apps from the Google Play Store and Apple App Store, and 21 apps identified by the manual search. mHealth apps were found to have the potential to replace GPs for tasks such as recording medical history and making diagnoses; performing some physical examinations; supporting clinical decision making and management; assisting in urgent, long-term, and disease-specific care; and health promotion. In contrast, mHealth apps were unable to perform medical procedures, appropriately utilise other professionals, and coordinate a team-based approach.

CONCLUSIONS

This scoping review highlights the functions of mHealth apps that can potentially replace GP tasks. Future research should focus on assessing the performance and quality of mHealth apps in comparison with that of real doctors.

摘要

背景

移动医疗应用程序(mHealth 应用程序)越来越多地被用于执行传统上由全科医生(GP)执行的任务,例如促进健康、预防疾病、诊断、治疗、监测和支持医疗服务等任务。这就提出了一个重要的问题:移动应用程序可以替代全科医生吗?本研究旨在系统地搜索和识别可以执行 GP 任务的移动应用程序。

方法

进行了范围界定审查。使用源自英国皇家全科医师学院(RCGP)关于全科医生核心能力和技能指南的术语,在 Google Play 商店和 Apple App Store 中搜索移动应用程序。还进行了手动搜索以识别其他应用程序。

结果

最终分析包括来自 Google Play 商店和 Apple App Store 的 17 个应用程序,以及通过手动搜索确定的 21 个应用程序。发现 mHealth 应用程序有可能替代全科医生执行某些任务,例如记录病史和做出诊断;进行一些体检;支持临床决策和管理;协助紧急、长期和特定疾病的护理;以及促进健康。相比之下,mHealth 应用程序无法进行医疗程序,无法适当利用其他专业人员,也无法协调基于团队的方法。

结论

本范围界定审查强调了 mHealth 应用程序可以潜在替代 GP 任务的功能。未来的研究应侧重于评估 mHealth 应用程序的性能和质量,并将其与真正的医生进行比较。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9352/6945711/22267ae88241/12911_2019_1016_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9352/6945711/22267ae88241/12911_2019_1016_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9352/6945711/22267ae88241/12911_2019_1016_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Can mobile health apps replace GPs? A scoping review of comparisons between mobile apps and GP tasks.移动医疗应用程序能否替代全科医生?对移动应用程序与全科医生任务进行比较的范围综述。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Jan 6;20(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-1016-4.
2
Willingness of French General Practitioners to Prescribe mHealth Apps and Devices: Quantitative Study.法国全科医生开单 mHealth 应用程序和设备的意愿:定量研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Feb 11;10(2):e28372. doi: 10.2196/28372.
3
Exploring Heart Disease-Related mHealth Apps in India: Systematic Search in App Stores and Metadata Analysis.探索印度与心脏病相关的移动健康应用程序:在应用商店中进行系统搜索和元数据分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 10;27:e53823. doi: 10.2196/53823.
4
Attitudes of General Practitioners Toward Prescription of Mobile Health Apps: Qualitative Study.全科医生对开具移动健康应用程序处方的态度:定性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Mar 4;9(3):e21795. doi: 10.2196/21795.
5
Current Knowledge and Adoption of Mobile Health Apps Among Australian General Practitioners: Survey Study.澳大利亚全科医生对移动医疗应用的认知和采用情况:调查研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Jun 3;7(6):e13199. doi: 10.2196/13199.
6
Mobile Apps for Common Noncommunicable Disease Management: Systematic Search in App Stores and Evaluation Using the Mobile App Rating Scale.移动应用程序用于常见非传染性疾病管理:在应用商店中的系统搜索和使用移动应用程序评级量表进行评估。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024 Mar 12;12:e49055. doi: 10.2196/49055.
7
Quality Assessment of Smartphone Medication Management Apps in France: Systematic Search.法国智能手机药物管理应用程序的质量评估:系统检索。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024 Mar 18;12:e54866. doi: 10.2196/54866.
8
Mobile Health Apps for Medical Emergencies: Systematic Review.移动医疗应用程序在医疗紧急情况下的应用:系统评价。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Dec 11;8(12):e18513. doi: 10.2196/18513.
9
The Quality of Indian Obesity-Related mHealth Apps: PRECEDE-PROCEED Model-Based Content Analysis.印度肥胖相关移动健康应用的质量:基于 PRECEDE-PROCEED 模型的内容分析。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 May 11;10(5):e15719. doi: 10.2196/15719.
10
Mobile Health Apps on COVID-19 Launched in the Early Days of the Pandemic: Content Analysis and Review.大流行早期推出的 COVID-19 移动健康应用程序:内容分析和综述。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Sep 16;8(9):e19796. doi: 10.2196/19796.

引用本文的文献

1
Scoping review of digital health technologies and interventions that target lifestyle behavior change in Singapore.针对新加坡生活方式行为改变的数字健康技术与干预措施的范围综述。
Digit Health. 2025 May 21;11:20552076251337032. doi: 10.1177/20552076251337032. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
From awareness to integration: a qualitative interview study on the impact of digital therapeutics on physicians' practices in Germany.从认知到整合:关于数字疗法对德国医生医疗实践影响的定性访谈研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Apr 18;25(1):568. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12656-2.
3
The understanding of digital communication experts and oral cancer at-risk persons on oral cancer, their uptake of educational mobile health applications on oral cancer, and their opinions on how a good application of such should look like: findings from a qualitative study.

本文引用的文献

1
Near-Field Communication Sensors.近场通信传感器。
Sensors (Basel). 2019 Sep 12;19(18):3947. doi: 10.3390/s19183947.
2
Smartphone Sensors for Health Monitoring and Diagnosis.智能手机传感器在健康监测与诊断中的应用
Sensors (Basel). 2019 May 9;19(9):2164. doi: 10.3390/s19092164.
3
Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach.系统评价或范围综述?在选择系统评价或范围综述方法时,作者的指南。
数字通信专家和口腔癌高危人群对口腔癌的认知、他们对口腔癌教育移动健康应用程序的使用情况,以及他们对这类应用程序应具备何种良好形式的看法:一项定性研究的结果
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Feb 12;25(1):224. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05614-1.
4
Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence Based Chatbots in Analyzing Orthopedic Pathologies: An Experimental Multi-Observer Analysis.基于人工智能的聊天机器人在分析骨科病理方面的准确性:一项多观察者实验分析。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Jan 19;15(2):221. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15020221.
5
The Doctors, Their Patients, and the Symptom Checker App: Qualitative Interview Study With General Practitioners in Germany.《医生、患者与症状自查 App:德国全科医生的定性访谈研究》
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Nov 18;11:e57360. doi: 10.2196/57360.
6
Concordance of data collected by an app for medical history taking and in-person interviews from patients in primary care.一款用于采集病史的应用程序所收集的数据与基层医疗中对患者进行的面对面访谈数据的一致性。
JAMIA Open. 2024 Oct 7;7(4):ooae102. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae102. eCollection 2024 Dec.
7
Health Maintenance Organization-mHealth Versus Face-to-Face Interaction for Health Care in Israel: Cross-Sectional Web-Based Survey Study.健康维护组织(HMO)-移动医疗(mHealth)与面对面交互在以色列医疗保健中的应用:基于网络的横断面调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Sep 30;26:e55350. doi: 10.2196/55350.
8
Comparative Evaluation of Digital Cephalometric Tracing Applications on Mobile Devices and Manual Tracing.移动设备上的数字化头影测量追踪应用与手动追踪的比较评估
Med Sci Monit. 2024 Jun 23;30:e944628. doi: 10.12659/MSM.944628.
9
Does an App a Day Keep the Doctor Away? AI Symptom Checker Applications, Entrenched Bias, and Professional Responsibility.一天一个 App ,能否让医生远离我?人工智能症状检查应用程序、根深蒂固的偏见与专业责任。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jun 5;26:e50344. doi: 10.2196/50344.
10
Rewiring care delivery through Digital Therapeutics (DTx): a machine learning-enhanced assessment and development (M-LEAD) framework.通过数字治疗(DTx)重新设计医疗服务提供:一个机器学习增强评估和开发(M-LEAD)框架。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Feb 23;24(1):237. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10702-z.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Nov 19;18(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x.
4
Perceptions on mobile health in the primary healthcare setting in Belgium.比利时基层医疗环境中对移动健康的认知。
Mhealth. 2018 Sep 30;4:44. doi: 10.21037/mhealth.2018.09.01. eCollection 2018.
5
The Application of Medical Artificial Intelligence Technology in Rural Areas of Developing Countries.医学人工智能技术在发展中国家农村地区的应用
Health Equity. 2018 Aug 1;2(1):174-181. doi: 10.1089/heq.2018.0037. eCollection 2018.
6
Artificial intelligence (AI) and global health: how can AI contribute to health in resource-poor settings?人工智能与全球健康:人工智能如何助力资源匮乏地区的健康事业?
BMJ Glob Health. 2018 Aug 29;3(4):e000798. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000798. eCollection 2018.
7
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation.PRISMA 扩展用于范围审查 (PRISMA-ScR): 清单和解释。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
8
A Path to Better-Quality mHealth Apps.通往更高质量移动健康应用程序的途径。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Jul 30;6(7):e10414. doi: 10.2196/10414.
9
The values and ethical commitments of doctors engaging in macroallocation: a qualitative and evaluative analysis.参与宏观分配的医生的价值观和道德承诺:一项定性与评估分析。
BMC Med Ethics. 2018 Jul 24;19(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12910-018-0314-1.
10
The decline of clinical skills: a challenge for medical schools.临床技能的衰退:医学院面临的一项挑战。
Int J Med Educ. 2018 Jul 13;9:195-197. doi: 10.5116/ijme.5b3f.9fb3.