Departments of a Pharmacology and Toxicology.
Departments of Pathology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia 23298.
Radiat Res. 2020 Aug 1;194(2):103-115. doi: 10.1667/RADE-20-00009.
Radiation is a critical pillar in cancer therapeutics, exerting its anti-tumor DNA-damaging effects through various direct and indirect mechanisms. Radiation has served as an effective mode of treatment for a number of cancer types, providing both curative and palliative treatment; however, resistance to therapy persists as a fundamental limitation. While cancer cell death is the ideal outcome of any anti-tumor treatment, radiation induces several responses, including apoptotic cell death, mitotic catastrophe, autophagy and senescence, where autophagy and senescence may promote cell survival. In most cases, autophagy, a conventionally cytoprotective mechanism, is a "first" responder to damage incurred from chemotherapy and radiation treatment. The paradigm developed on the premise that autophagy is cytoprotective in nature has provided the rationale for current clinical trials designed with the goal of radiosensitizing cancer cells through the use of autophagy inhibitors; however, these have failed to produce consistent results. Delving further into pre-clinical studies, autophagy has actually been shown to take diverse, sometimes opposing, forms, such as acting in a cytotoxic or nonprotective fashion, which may be partially responsible for the inconsistency of clinical outcomes. Furthermore, autophagy can have both pro- and anti-tumorigenic effects, while also having an important immune modulatory function. Senescence often occurs in tandem with autophagy, which is also the case with radiation. Radiation-induced senescence is frequently followed by a phase of proliferative recovery in a subset of cells and has been proposed as a tumor dormancy model, which can contribute to resistance to therapy and possibly also disease recurrence. Senescence induction is often accompanied by a unique secretory phenotype that can either promote or suppress immune functions, depending on the expression profile of cytokines and chemokines. Novel therapeutics selectively cytotoxic to senescent cells (senolytics) may prove to prolong remission by delaying disease recurrence in patients. Accurate assessment of primary responses to radiation may provide potential targets that can be manipulated for therapeutic benefit to sensitize cancer cells to radiotherapy, while sparing normal tissue.
辐射是癌症治疗中的一个关键支柱,通过各种直接和间接的机制发挥其抗肿瘤 DNA 损伤作用。辐射已成为多种癌症类型的有效治疗方式,既能提供根治性治疗,也能提供姑息性治疗;然而,治疗抵抗仍然是一个基本的限制。虽然任何抗肿瘤治疗的理想结果都是癌细胞死亡,但辐射会引起多种反应,包括细胞凋亡、有丝分裂灾难、自噬和衰老,其中自噬和衰老可能促进细胞存活。在大多数情况下,自噬作为一种传统的细胞保护机制,是对化疗和放疗损伤的“第一”反应。自噬在本质上具有细胞保护作用的这一范式为目前的临床试验提供了理论依据,这些临床试验旨在通过使用自噬抑制剂来增敏癌细胞的放疗效果;然而,这些临床试验并未产生一致的结果。进一步深入研究临床前研究,自噬实际上已经表现出多种不同的、有时是相反的形式,例如以细胞毒性或非保护的方式发挥作用,这可能部分解释了临床试验结果不一致的原因。此外,自噬既具有促肿瘤发生作用,也具有抗肿瘤发生作用,同时还具有重要的免疫调节功能。衰老通常与自噬同时发生,这与辐射也是如此。辐射诱导的衰老通常会在一部分细胞中经历一个增殖恢复的阶段,并被提出作为一种肿瘤休眠模型,这可能导致对治疗的抵抗,并且可能还导致疾病复发。衰老诱导通常伴随着一种独特的分泌表型,根据细胞因子和趋化因子的表达谱,这种分泌表型可以促进或抑制免疫功能。选择性杀伤衰老细胞的新型治疗药物(衰老细胞溶解剂)可能通过延迟患者疾病复发来延长缓解期。准确评估对辐射的原发性反应可能为治疗提供潜在的靶点,使癌细胞对放射疗法更敏感,同时保护正常组织。