• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Effects of Regulatory Focus and Emotions on Information Preferences: The Affect-as-Information Perspective.调节焦点和情绪对信息偏好的影响:情感即信息视角
Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 10;11:1397. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01397. eCollection 2020.
2
Information Matching: How Regulatory Focus Affects Information Preference and Information Choice.信息匹配:监管焦点如何影响信息偏好与信息选择
Front Psychol. 2021 May 28;12:618537. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.618537. eCollection 2021.
3
Promoting Water Conservation Based on the Matching Effect of Regulatory Focus and Emotion.基于调节焦点和情绪匹配效应的节水推广
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 9;18(4):1680. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041680.
4
Feeling Happy and Sad at the Same Time? Subcultural Differences in Experiencing Mixed Emotions between Han Chinese and Mongolian Chinese.同时感到开心和悲伤?汉族和蒙古族在体验混合情绪方面的亚文化差异。
Front Psychol. 2016 Oct 27;7:1692. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01692. eCollection 2016.
5
The influence of induced mood on music preference.诱导情绪对音乐偏好的影响。
Cogn Process. 2018 Nov;19(4):517-525. doi: 10.1007/s10339-018-0872-7. Epub 2018 Jul 12.
6
Regulatory Focus and Subjective Well-Being: The Mediating Role of Coping Styles and the Moderating Role of Gender.调节焦点与主观幸福感:应对方式的中介作用及性别调节作用。
J Psychol. 2019;153(7):714-731. doi: 10.1080/00223980.2019.1601066. Epub 2019 Apr 24.
7
Embodied Emotion Regulation: The Influence of Implicit Emotional Compatibility on Creative Thinking.具身情绪调节:内隐情绪兼容性对创造性思维的影响。
Front Psychol. 2020 Aug 6;11:1822. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01822. eCollection 2020.
8
Context specificity of implicit preferences: the case of human preference for red.内隐偏好的情境特异性:以人类对红色的偏好为例。
Emotion. 2009 Oct;9(5):734-8. doi: 10.1037/a0016818.
9
More than words (and faces): evidence for a Stroop effect of prosody in emotion word processing.不止于言语(和面孔):情绪词汇加工中韵律的斯特鲁普效应证据
Cogn Emot. 2017 Aug;31(5):879-891. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2016.1177489. Epub 2016 May 3.
10
Explicit and Implicit Responses of Seeing Own vs. Others' Emotions: An Electromyographic Study on the Neurophysiological and Cognitive Basis of the Self-Mirroring Technique.看到自己与他人情绪时的显性与隐性反应:一项关于自我镜像技术的神经生理和认知基础的肌电图研究
Front Psychol. 2020 Mar 31;11:433. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00433. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of parental regulatory focus on the loneliness stigma of college children.父母调节焦点对大学生孤独污名的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jan 23;24(1):273. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-17714-8.
2
Information Matching: How Regulatory Focus Affects Information Preference and Information Choice.信息匹配:监管焦点如何影响信息偏好与信息选择
Front Psychol. 2021 May 28;12:618537. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.618537. eCollection 2021.
3
Promoting Water Conservation Based on the Matching Effect of Regulatory Focus and Emotion.基于调节焦点和情绪匹配效应的节水推广
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 9;18(4):1680. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041680.

本文引用的文献

1
Discrete emotions predict changes in cognition, judgment, experience, behavior, and physiology: a meta-analysis of experimental emotion elicitations.离散情绪可预测认知、判断、体验、行为和生理的变化:实验诱发情绪的荟萃分析。
Psychol Bull. 2011 Sep;137(5):834-55. doi: 10.1037/a0024244.
2
Influence of different positive emotions on persuasion processing: a functional evolutionary approach.不同积极情绪对说服加工的影响:一种功能进化方法。
Emotion. 2010 Apr;10(2):190-206. doi: 10.1037/a0018421.
3
Development of a FACS-verified set of basic and self-conscious emotion expressions.一套经荧光激活细胞分选术(FACS)验证的基本情绪和自我意识情绪表达的开发。
Emotion. 2009 Aug;9(4):554-9. doi: 10.1037/a0015766.
4
Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity.理解与运用内隐联想测验:III. 预测效度的元分析
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 Jul;97(1):17-41. doi: 10.1037/a0015575.
5
Value from hedonic experience and engagement.来自享乐体验和参与的价值。
Psychol Rev. 2006 Jul;113(3):439-60. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.113.3.439.
6
Is the implicit association test immune to faking?内隐联想测验是否能抵御伪装?
Exp Psychol. 2004;51(3):165-79. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.51.3.165.
7
Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm.理解与运用内隐联想测验:I. 一种改进的计分算法。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Aug;85(2):197-216. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.197.
8
Enjoying goal-directed action: the role of regulatory fit.
Psychol Sci. 2002 Jan;13(1):1-6. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00401.
9
The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity.促进和预防线索对创造力的影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 Dec;81(6):1001-13. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.81.6.1001.
10
Regulatory concerns and appraisal efficiency: the general impact of promotion and prevention.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 May;80(5):693-705.

调节焦点和情绪对信息偏好的影响:情感即信息视角

Effects of Regulatory Focus and Emotions on Information Preferences: The Affect-as-Information Perspective.

作者信息

Wang Xiaomei, Zheng Quanquan, Wang Jia, Gu Yangli, Li Jiongying

机构信息

School of Media Studies and Humanities, Zhejiang University City College, Hangzhou, China.

Department of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 10;11:1397. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01397. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01397
PMID:32848964
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7396481/
Abstract

This study explored the effects of regulatory focus and emotions on information preferences, specifically information selection preferences (experiment 1) and implicit information preferences (experiment 2). Our findings revealed that, in the promotion-focused condition, individuals preferred hedonic information (vs. functional information) when they were happy (vs. sad). However, emotions' effects on information preferences were attenuated in the prevention-focused condition. In experiment 3, we tested whether regulatory focus and salient emotions influenced information preferences. The results suggested that regulatory focus and salient emotions had no significant interactive effect on information selection preferences, but had a significant interactive effect on implicit preferences. These results further our understanding of the psychological dynamic mechanism involved in information preferences, which augments the affect-as-information theory.

摘要

本研究探讨了调节焦点和情绪对信息偏好的影响,具体而言是信息选择偏好(实验1)和内隐信息偏好(实验2)。我们的研究结果表明,在促进型焦点条件下,个体在感到高兴(而非悲伤)时更偏好享乐信息(而非功能信息)。然而,在预防型焦点条件下,情绪对信息偏好的影响减弱。在实验3中,我们测试了调节焦点和显著情绪是否会影响信息偏好。结果表明,调节焦点和显著情绪对信息选择偏好没有显著的交互作用,但对内隐偏好有显著的交互作用。这些结果进一步加深了我们对信息偏好所涉及的心理动态机制的理解,这丰富了情感即信息理论。