Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, United States.
Provenance Biopharmaceuticals, Carlisle, MA, United States.
Front Immunol. 2020 Jul 24;11:1610. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01610. eCollection 2020.
In a syngeneic murine melanoma (MEL) model, we recently reported an vaccination response to combined radiation (RT) and intra-tumoral (IT) injection of anti-GD2 hu14. 18-IL2 immunocytokine (IC). This combined treatment resulted in 71% complete and durable regression of 5-week tumors, a tumor-specific memory T cell response, and augmented response to systemic anti-CTLA-4 antibody checkpoint blockade. While the ability of radiation to diversify anti-tumor T cell response has been reported, we hypothesize that mice rendered disease-free (DF) by a RT-based ISV might also exhibit a heightened B cell response. C57BL/6 mice were engrafted with 2 × 10 GD2+ B78 MEL and treated at a target tumor size of ~200 mm with 12 Gy RT, IT-IC on day (D)6-D10, and anti-CTLA-4 on D3, 6, and 9. Serum was collected via facial vein before tumor injection, before treatment, during treatment, after becoming DF, and following rejection of subcutaneous 2 × 10 B78 MEL re-challenge on D90. Flow cytometry demonstrated the presence of tumor-specific IgG in sera from mice rendered DF and rejecting re-challenge with B78 MEL at D90 after starting treatment. Consistent with an adaptive endogenous anti-tumor humoral memory response, these anti-tumor antibodies bound to B78 cells and parental B16 cells (GD2-), but not to the unrelated syngeneic Panc02 or Panc02 GD2+ cell lines. We evaluated the kinetics of this response and observed that tumor-specific IgG was consistently detected by D22 after initiation of treatment, corresponding to a time of rapid tumor regression. The amount of tumor-specific antibody binding to tumor cells (as measured by flow MFI) did not correlate with host animal prognosis. Incubation of B16 MEL cells in DF serum, vs. naïve serum, prior to IV injection, did not delay engraftment of B16 metastases and showed similar overall survival rates. B cell depletion using anti-CD20 or anti-CD19 and anti-B220 did not impact the efficacy of ISV treatment. Thus, treatment with RT + IC + anti-CTLA-4 results in adaptive anti-tumor humoral memory response. This endogenous tumor-specific antibody response does not appear to have therapeutic efficacy but may serve as a biomarker for an anti-tumor T cell response.
在一个同基因鼠黑色素瘤(MEL)模型中,我们最近报道了一种针对联合辐射(RT)和肿瘤内(IT)注射抗 GD2 hu14.18-IL2 免疫细胞因子(IC)的疫苗反应。这种联合治疗导致 5 周大的肿瘤完全和持久消退 71%,产生肿瘤特异性记忆 T 细胞反应,并增强了对全身抗 CTLA-4 抗体检查点阻断的反应。虽然已经报道了辐射使抗肿瘤 T 细胞反应多样化的能力,但我们假设通过基于 RT 的 ISV 使疾病无进展(DF)的小鼠也可能表现出增强的 B 细胞反应。C57BL/6 小鼠被植入 2×10 GD2+B78 MEL,并在目标肿瘤大小约 200mm 时接受 12Gy RT,IT-IC 于第(D)6-D10 天,以及第 3、6 和 9 天接受抗 CTLA-4 治疗。在肿瘤注射前、治疗前、治疗期间、DF 后以及第 90 天拒绝皮下 2×10 B78 MEL 再挑战时,通过面部静脉采集血清。流式细胞术显示,在开始治疗后第 90 天 DF 并拒绝 B78 MEL 再挑战的小鼠血清中存在肿瘤特异性 IgG。与适应性内源性抗肿瘤体液记忆反应一致,这些抗肿瘤抗体与 B78 细胞和亲本 B16 细胞(GD2-)结合,但与无关的同基因 Panc02 或 Panc02 GD2+细胞系不结合。我们评估了这种反应的动力学,并观察到在开始治疗后第 22 天始终检测到肿瘤特异性 IgG,这与肿瘤快速消退的时间相对应。与肿瘤细胞结合的肿瘤特异性抗体量(通过流式细胞术 MFI 测量)与宿主动物的预后无关。与幼稚血清相比,将 B16 MEL 细胞在 DF 血清中孵育,然后进行 IV 注射,不会延迟 B16 转移的植入,并且显示出相似的总生存率。用抗 CD20 或抗 CD19 和抗 B220 耗尽 B 细胞并不影响 ISV 治疗的疗效。因此,用 RT+IC+抗 CTLA-4 治疗可导致适应性抗肿瘤体液记忆反应。这种内源性肿瘤特异性抗体反应似乎没有治疗效果,但可能作为抗肿瘤 T 细胞反应的生物标志物。