Department of Industrial Engineering, Kadir Has University, Cibali 34083, Istanbul, Turkey.
J Healthc Eng. 2020 Aug 20;2020:8835258. doi: 10.1155/2020/8835258. eCollection 2020.
In this study, a hesitant fuzzy AHP method is presented to help decision makers (DMs), especially policymakers, governors, and physicians, evaluate the importance of intervention strategy alternatives applied by various countries for the COVID-19 pandemic. In this research, a hesitant fuzzy multicriteria decision making (MCDM) method, hesitant fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (hesitant F-AHP), is implemented to make pairwise comparison of COVID-19 country-level intervention strategies applied by various countries and determine relative importance scores. An illustrative study is presented where fifteen intervention strategies applied by various countries in the world during the COVID-19 pandemic are evaluated by seven physicians (a professor of infectious diseases and clinical microbiology, an infectious disease physician, a clinical microbiology physician, two internal medicine physicians, an anesthesiology and reanimation physician, and a family physician) in Turkey who act as DMs in the process.
在这项研究中，提出了一种犹豫模糊层次分析法，以帮助决策者（DM），特别是政策制定者、管理者和医生，评估各国应用的 COVID-19 大流行干预策略备选方案的重要性。在本研究中，实施了一种犹豫模糊多准则决策（MCDM）方法，即犹豫模糊层次分析法（hesitant F-AHP），以对各国实施的 COVID-19 国家级干预策略进行成对比较，并确定相对重要性得分。本文提出了一个实例研究，由土耳其的七名医生（传染病学和临床微生物学教授、传染病医生、临床微生物学医生、两名内科医生、麻醉学和复苏医生以及家庭医生）作为决策者（DM）评估了在 COVID-19 大流行期间世界各国应用的十五种干预策略。
