Suppr超能文献

洋地黄叶滴眼液用于治疗有眼部分泌物的早产儿:一项随机双盲安慰剂对照试验。

Euphrasia Eye Drops in Preterm Neonates With Ocular Discharge: A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Meier-Girard Delphine, Gerstenberg Gisa, Stoffel Liliane, Kohler Therese, Klein Sabine D, Eschenmoser Marco, Mitter Vera Ruth, Nelle Mathias, Wolf Ursula

机构信息

Anthroposophically Extended Medicine, Institute of Complementary and Integrative Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Department of Neonatology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

Front Pediatr. 2020 Aug 11;8:449. doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.00449. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

To investigate whether the early administration of Euphrasia eye drops® in preterm neonates presenting with ocular discharge fosters the resolution of the ocular discharge and reduces the need for topical antibiotic therapy, as compared to placebo. We conducted a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial at the University Children's Hospital Bern, Switzerland. Preterm neonates with white, yellow, or green ocular discharge were included. Infants were randomly assigned (1:1) to the Euphrasia arm (Euphrasia eye drops®, Weleda AG, Arlesheim) or the placebo arm (NaCl 0.9%). Euphrasia or placebo was administrated at a dose of one drop in each eye four times a day over a period of 96 h. The primary outcome was the treatment success, defined as no ocular discharge at 96 h and no use of topical antibiotic therapy during the 96-h intervention. A total of 114 neonates were screened and 84 were randomized. Among neonates in the Euphrasia arm, 22 (55.0%) achieved our primary outcome compared to 21 (51.2%) in the placebo arm ( = 0.85). In the Euphrasia arm, time to resolution of reddening tended to fall within the shorter bracket of 24 to 48 h (24 (92.3%) vs. 12 (80.0%) in the placebo arm, = 0.34) and relapse or first signs of reddening during the 96-h intervention tended to be lower [3 (7.9%) eyes vs. 8 (18.2%) eyes in the placebo arm, = 0.17]. Tearing at 96 h tended to be lower in the Euphrasia arm [5 (12.8%) eyes in the Euphrasia arm vs. 12 (27.3%) eyes in the placebo arm, = 0.10]. Euphrasia did not significantly improve treatment success, defined as no ocular discharge at 96 h and no use of topical antibiotic therapy during the 96-h intervention. However, results suggest that Euphrasia may be of benefit for symptoms such as reddening and tearing, and thus improve the comfort of patients. The trial is registered at the US National Institutes of Health (ClinicalTrials.gov) NCT04122300 and at the portal for human research in Switzerland SNCTP000003490.

摘要

为了研究与安慰剂相比,对出现眼部分泌物的早产儿早期使用小米草眼药水®是否能促进眼部分泌物的消退并减少局部抗生素治疗的需求。我们在瑞士伯尔尼大学儿童医院进行了一项随机双盲安慰剂对照试验。纳入有白色、黄色或绿色眼部分泌物的早产儿。婴儿被随机分配(1:1)至小米草组(小米草眼药水®,维蕾德公司,阿尔勒斯海姆)或安慰剂组(0.9%氯化钠)。在96小时内,每天4次,每只眼睛滴一滴小米草眼药水或安慰剂。主要结局是治疗成功,定义为96小时时无眼部分泌物且在96小时干预期间未使用局部抗生素治疗。共筛查了114名新生儿,84名被随机分组。在小米草组的新生儿中,22名(55.0%)达到了我们的主要结局,而安慰剂组为21名(51.2%)(P = 0.85)。在小米草组,发红消退时间倾向于落在24至48小时的较短范围内(24名(92.3%) vs. 安慰剂组12名(80.0%),P = 0.34),且在96小时干预期间复发或首次出现发红迹象的情况倾向于更低[3只(7.9%)眼睛 vs. 安慰剂组8只(18.2%)眼睛,P = 0.17]。96小时时的流泪情况在小米草组倾向于更低[小米草组5只(12.8%)眼睛 vs. 安慰剂组12只(27.3%)眼睛,P = 0.10]。小米草并没有显著提高治疗成功率,治疗成功定义为96小时时无眼部分泌物且在96小时干预期间未使用局部抗生素治疗。然而,结果表明小米草可能对发红和流泪等症状有益,从而提高患者的舒适度。该试验已在美国国立卫生研究院(ClinicalTrials.gov)注册,注册号为NCT04122300,在瑞士人类研究门户网站注册,注册号为SNCTP000003490。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18c4/7431947/5452add5ff16/fped-08-00449-g0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验