• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与常规护理相比,孕早期预测和预防早发型子痫前期模型的成本效益分析。

Cost-effectiveness analysis of a model of first-trimester prediction and prevention of preterm pre-eclampsia compared with usual care.

作者信息

Park F, Deeming S, Bennett N, Hyett J

机构信息

Department of Maternal Fetal Medicine, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, Australia.

Health Research Economics, Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, Australia.

出版信息

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Nov;58(5):688-697. doi: 10.1002/uog.22193. Epub 2021 Oct 19.

DOI:10.1002/uog.22193
PMID:32851709
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Pre-eclampsia (PE) causes substantial maternal and neonatal mortality and morbidity. In addition to the personal impact on women, children and their families, PE has a significant economic impact on our society. Recent research suggests that a first-trimester multivariate model is highly predictive of preterm (< 37 weeks' gestation) PE and can be combined successfully with targeted prophylaxis (low-dose aspirin), resulting in an 80% reduction in prevalence of disease. The aim of this study was to examine the potential health outcomes and cost implications following introduction of first-trimester prediction and prevention of preterm PE within a public healthcare setting, compared with usual care, and to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis to inform health-service decisions regarding implementation of such a program.

METHODS

A decision-analytic model was used to compare usual care with the proposed first-trimester screening intervention within the obstetric population (n = 6822) attending two public hospitals within a metropolitan district health service in New South Wales, Australia, between January 2015 and December 2016. The model, applied from early pregnancy, included exposure to a variety of healthcare professionals and addressed type of risk assessment (usual care or first-trimester screening) and use of (compliance with) low-dose aspirin prescribed prophylactically for prevention of PE. All pathways culminated in six possible health outcomes, ranging from no PE to maternal death. Results were presented as the number of cases of PE gained/avoided and the incremental increase/decrease in economic costs arising from the intervention compared with usual care. Significant assumptions were tested in sensitivity/uncertainty analyses.

RESULTS

The intervention produced, across all gestational ages, 31 fewer cases of PE and reduced aggregate economic health-service costs by 1 431 186 Australian dollars over the 2-year period. None of the tested iterations of uncertainty analyses reported additional cases of PE or higher economic costs. The new intervention based on first-trimester screening dominated usual care.

CONCLUSION

This cost-effectiveness analysis demonstrated a reduction in prevalence of preterm PE and substantial cost savings associated with a population-based program of first-trimester prediction and prevention of PE, and supports implementation of such a policy. © 2020 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

摘要

目的

子痫前期(PE)导致大量孕产妇和新生儿死亡及发病。除了对妇女、儿童及其家庭的个人影响外,PE对我们的社会也有重大经济影响。近期研究表明,孕早期多变量模型对早产(孕周<37周)PE具有高度预测性,并且可以成功地与靶向预防措施(低剂量阿司匹林)相结合,使疾病患病率降低80%。本研究的目的是与常规护理相比,研究在公共医疗环境中引入孕早期早产PE预测和预防措施后的潜在健康结局和成本影响,并进行成本效益分析,为关于实施此类计划的卫生服务决策提供依据。

方法

采用决策分析模型,对2015年1月至2016年12月期间在澳大利亚新南威尔士州一个大都市地区卫生服务机构内的两家公立医院就诊的产科人群(n = 6822)中的常规护理与拟议的孕早期筛查干预措施进行比较。该模型从妊娠早期开始应用,包括接触各种医疗保健专业人员,并涉及风险评估类型(常规护理或孕早期筛查)以及预防性使用(依从性)低剂量阿司匹林预防PE。所有路径最终导致六种可能的健康结局,从不发生PE到孕产妇死亡。结果以获得/避免的PE病例数以及与常规护理相比干预措施导致的经济成本的增量增加/减少来呈现。在敏感性/不确定性分析中对重要假设进行了检验。

结果

在所有孕周中,该干预措施使PE病例减少了31例,并在2年期间使总体经济卫生服务成本降低了1431186澳元。不确定性分析的所有测试迭代均未报告额外的PE病例或更高的经济成本。基于孕早期筛查的新干预措施优于常规护理。

结论

这项成本效益分析表明,基于人群的孕早期PE预测和预防计划可降低早产PE的患病率并节省大量成本,并支持实施此类政策。© 2020国际妇产科超声学会。

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness analysis of a model of first-trimester prediction and prevention of preterm pre-eclampsia compared with usual care.与常规护理相比,孕早期预测和预防早发型子痫前期模型的成本效益分析。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Nov;58(5):688-697. doi: 10.1002/uog.22193. Epub 2021 Oct 19.
2
Screening for pre-eclampsia at 11-13 weeks' gestation: use of pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A, placental growth factor or both.11-13 孕周筛查子痫前期:使用妊娠相关血浆蛋白-A、胎盘生长因子或两者联合。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Sep;56(3):400-407. doi: 10.1002/uog.22093. Epub 2020 Aug 5.
3
ASPRE trial: risk factors for development of preterm pre-eclampsia despite aspirin prophylaxis.ASPRE 试验:尽管进行了阿司匹林预防,早产子痫前期发展的风险因素。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Oct;58(4):546-552. doi: 10.1002/uog.23668. Epub 2021 Sep 6.
4
Cost-effectiveness of first-trimester screening with early preventative use of aspirin in women at high risk of early-onset pre-eclampsia.早发型子痫前期高危孕妇早孕期阿司匹林预防性使用的成本效果分析。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Feb;53(2):239-244. doi: 10.1002/uog.19076.
5
Prospective evaluation of first-trimester screening strategy for preterm pre-eclampsia and its clinical applicability in China.前瞻性评估早孕期子痫前期筛查策略及其在中国的临床适用性。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Oct;58(4):529-539. doi: 10.1002/uog.23645.
6
Prediction of preterm pre-eclampsia according to NICE and ACOG criteria: descriptive study of 597 492 Danish births from 2008 to 2017.根据 NICE 和 ACOG 标准预测早产子痫前期:2008 年至 2017 年丹麦 597492 例出生的描述性研究。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Oct;58(4):561-567. doi: 10.1002/uog.23693.
7
Prediction and prevention of small-for-gestational-age neonates: evidence from SPREE and ASPRE.预测和预防小于胎龄儿:来自 SPREE 和 ASPRE 的证据。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jul;52(1):52-59. doi: 10.1002/uog.19077. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
8
Diagnostic accuracy of first-trimester combined screening for early-onset and preterm pre-eclampsia at 8-10 compared with 11-13 weeks' gestation.早发型和早产子痫前期的孕早期联合筛查在 8-10 周与 11-13 周妊娠时的诊断准确性比较。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jan;57(1):84-90. doi: 10.1002/uog.22071.
9
Effect of routine first-trimester combined screening for pre-eclampsia on small-for-gestational-age birth: secondary interrupted time series analysis.常规早孕期子痫前期联合筛查对小于胎龄儿出生的影响:二次中断时间序列分析。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Jan;59(1):55-60. doi: 10.1002/uog.23741.
10
Stratification of pregnancy care based on risk of pre-eclampsia derived from biophysical and biochemical markers at 19-24 weeks' gestation.根据 19-24 孕周的生物物理和生化标志物预测子痫前期风险的妊娠护理分层。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Sep;58(3):360-368. doi: 10.1002/uog.23640. Epub 2021 Jul 28.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of aspirin combined with labetalol on coagulation function and pregnancy outcomes in pre-eclamptic pregnant women.阿司匹林联合拉贝洛尔对先兆子痫孕妇凝血功能及妊娠结局的影响
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Feb 27;25(1):215. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07314-8.
2
Cost-effectiveness of a randomized controlled trial comparing low-dose aspirin to placebo for the prevention of recurrent preterm birth.一项比较低剂量阿司匹林与安慰剂预防复发性早产的随机对照试验的成本效益分析。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025 Apr;169(1):399-407. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.16024. Epub 2024 Nov 28.
3
Benefits and harms of antenatal and newborn screening programmes in health economic assessments: the VALENTIA systematic review and qualitative investigation.
产前和新生儿筛查计划在健康经济评估中的获益和危害:VALENTIA 系统评价和定性研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Jun;28(25):1-180. doi: 10.3310/PYTK6591.
4
Redesigning antenatal care: Prospective use of an implementation framework to establish a population-based multidisciplinary first-trimester screening, assessment and prevention service.重新设计产前护理:前瞻性地使用实施框架来建立基于人群的多学科孕早期筛查、评估和预防服务。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2024 Dec;64(6):588-595. doi: 10.1111/ajo.13837. Epub 2024 May 23.
5
Performance of the first-trimester Fetal Medicine Foundation competing risks model for preeclampsia prediction: an external validation study in Brazil.孕早期胎儿医学基金会子痫前期预测竞争风险模型的性能:巴西的一项外部验证研究
AJOG Glob Rep. 2024 Mar 29;4(2):100346. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2024.100346. eCollection 2024 May.
6
First-Trimester Screening Program for the Risk of Pre-eclampsia Using a Multiple-Marker Algorithm: A Health Technology Assessment.早孕期子痫前期风险的多标记物算法筛查方案:一项卫生技术评估。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2022 Dec 8;22(5):1-118. eCollection 2023.
7
Pre-eclampsia.子痫前期。
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2023 Feb 16;9(1):8. doi: 10.1038/s41572-023-00417-6.
8
Early cost-effectiveness analysis of screening for preeclampsia in nulliparous women: A modelling approach in European high-income settings.初产妇子痫前期筛查的成本效益分析:欧洲高收入国家的建模方法。
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 21;17(4):e0267313. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267313. eCollection 2022.
9
The feasibility of soluble Fms-Like Tyrosine kinase-1 (sFLT-1) and Placental Growth Factor (PlGF) ratio biomarker in predicting preeclampsia and adverse pregnancy outcomes among medium to high risk mothers in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.可溶性 Fms-样酪氨酸激酶-1(sFLT-1)和胎盘生长因子(PlGF)比值生物标志物在马来西亚吉隆坡中高危产妇预测子痫前期和不良妊娠结局中的可行性。
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 11;17(3):e0265080. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265080. eCollection 2022.
10
Clinical tools and biomarkers to predict preeclampsia.预测子痫前期的临床工具和生物标志物。
EBioMedicine. 2022 Jan;75:103780. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103780. Epub 2021 Dec 23.