Suppr超能文献

早孕期子痫前期风险的多标记物算法筛查方案:一项卫生技术评估。

First-Trimester Screening Program for the Risk of Pre-eclampsia Using a Multiple-Marker Algorithm: A Health Technology Assessment.

出版信息

Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2022 Dec 8;22(5):1-118. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pre-eclampsia is when high blood pressure develops after 20 weeks of pregnancy and either proteinuria, maternal end-organ dysfunction, or uteroplacental dysfunction causing fetal growth restriction also develops. The Fetal Medicine Foundation has created an algorithm ("the FMF algorithm") that uses maternal factors in combination with biophysical and biochemical markers to identify people at high risk for pre-eclampsia so that they can been offered acetylsalicylic acid (Aspirin) as a preventive measure. We conducted a health technology assessment to evaluate the safety, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of a first-trimester population-wide screening program for pre-eclampsia risk that uses the FMF algorithm ("the FMF-based screening program"). We also evaluated the accuracy of the FMF algorithm, the budget impact of publicly funding the population-wide FMF-based screening program, and patient preferences and values.

METHODS

We performed a systematic literature search of the clinical evidence. We assessed the risk of bias of each study using the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies-of Interventions tool and the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-Comparative tool, and the quality of the body of evidence according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group criteria. We performed a systematic economic literature search and conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing the FMF-based screening program to standard care (screening for risk of pre-eclampsia using maternal factors alone) from a public payer perspective. We also analyzed the budget impact of publicly funding a population-wide FMF-based screening program in Ontario. We spoke with people who have experience with pregnancy and preeclampsia and their family members through direct interviews to gather preferences and values surrounding pre-eclampsia and the potential screening program.

RESULTS

We included nine studies in the clinical evidence review. The FMF-based screening program likely reduces the risk of pre-eclampsia with delivery at less than 37 weeks' gestation compared with standard care, when initiated at 11+ to 13+ weeks' gestation; risk ratios ranged from 0.64 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.46-0.93) to 0.70 (95% CI 0.58-0.84) (GRADE: Moderate). It may reduce the risks of low birth weight (risk ratio 0.89 [95% CI 0.85-0.94]) and low Apgar score (risk ratio 0.73 [95% CI 0.63-0.85]) (GRADE: Low). Evidence on the effectiveness of the FMF-based screening program in reducing the risk of stillbirth and neonatal death was highly uncertain (GRADE: Very low). In addition, the FMF algorithm can improve the detection rate of pre-eclampsia with delivery at less than 37 weeks' gestation or at less than 34 weeks' gestation compared with conventional algorithms, although there are concerns about bias and applicability across studies. The population-wide FMF-based screening program is more effective and more costly than standard care. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of the population-wide FMF-based screening program compared with standard care is $3,446 per prevented case of pre-eclampsia with delivery at less than 37 weeks. The annual budget impact of publicly funding the population-wide FMF-based screening program in Ontario ranges from an additional $1.23 million in year 1 to $3.56 million in year 5, for a total of $8.50 million over the next 5 years. The population-wide FMF-based screening program was seen as valuable by those who have experienced pregnancy and their family members. Strong emphasis was placed on providing education and equitable access as part of any screening program, and participants valued the potential clinical benefits that the population-wide FMF-based screening program could provide.

CONCLUSIONS

The FMF-based screening program is likely more effective than standard care in reducing the risk of pre-eclampsia with delivery at less than 37 weeks' gestation. Also, the FMF algorithm can improve the detection rate of pre-eclampsia with delivery at less than 37 weeks' gestation or at less than 34 weeks' gestation when compared with conventional algorithms. The population-wide FMF-based screening program is more effective and more costly than standard care. We estimate that publicly funding the population-wide FMF-based screening program in Ontario would result in additional costs of $8.50 million over the next 5 years. Pregnant people and their family members valued the potential equitable access, information, and clinical benefits that the population-wide FMF-based screening program could provide.

摘要

背景

子痫前期是指妊娠 20 周后出现高血压,同时伴有蛋白尿、母体终末器官功能障碍或胎盘-胎儿功能障碍导致胎儿生长受限。胎儿医学基金会创建了一种算法(“FMF 算法”),该算法结合了母体因素以及生物物理和生物化学标志物,以识别子痫前期高危人群,从而为他们提供乙酰水杨酸(阿司匹林)作为预防措施。我们进行了一项健康技术评估,以评估一种用于子痫前期风险的基于第一孕期人群的筛查计划的安全性、有效性和成本效益,该计划使用 FMF 算法(“基于 FMF 的筛查计划”)。我们还评估了 FMF 算法的准确性、公共资金支持基于 FMF 的人群筛查计划的预算影响,以及患者偏好和价值观。

方法

我们对临床证据进行了系统的文献检索。我们使用风险偏倚评估工具和诊断准确性研究比较工具评估每项研究的风险偏倚,并根据 Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) 工作组标准评估证据质量。我们进行了系统的经济文献检索,并从公共支付者的角度,对基于 FMF 的筛查计划与标准护理(仅使用母体因素筛查子痫前期风险)进行了成本效益分析。我们还分析了在安大略省公共资助基于 FMF 的人群筛查计划的预算影响。我们通过直接访谈与经历过妊娠和子痫前期的人和他们的家庭成员进行了交谈,以收集有关子痫前期和潜在筛查计划的偏好和价值观。

结果

我们纳入了九项临床证据综述研究。基于 FMF 的筛查计划在 11+至 13+周妊娠时启动,与标准护理相比,可能降低 37 周前分娩的子痫前期风险;风险比范围从 0.64(95%置信区间 0.46-0.93)到 0.70(95%置信区间 0.58-0.84)(GRADE:中度)。它可能降低低出生体重(风险比 0.89 [95%置信区间 0.85-0.94])和低 Apgar 评分(风险比 0.73 [95%置信区间 0.63-0.85])的风险(GRADE:低)。关于基于 FMF 的筛查计划降低 37 周前或 34 周前死产和新生儿死亡风险的有效性证据极不确定(GRADE:极低)。此外,与传统算法相比,FMF 算法可以提高子痫前期的检出率,在 37 周前分娩或 34 周前分娩(尽管在研究之间存在偏倚和适用性的担忧)。基于人群的 FMF 筛查计划比标准护理更有效且成本更高。与标准护理相比,基于人群的 FMF 筛查计划的增量成本效益比为每预防一例 37 周前分娩的子痫前期减少 3466 美元。在安大略省,公共资助基于人群的 FMF 筛查计划的年度预算影响范围从第 1 年的额外 123 万美元到第 5 年的 3560 万美元,未来 5 年总计 8500 万美元。经历过妊娠和他们的家庭成员的人认为基于人群的 FMF 筛查计划是有价值的。他们非常强调在任何筛查计划中提供教育和公平获取的机会,并重视基于人群的 FMF 筛查计划可以提供的潜在临床益处。

结论

与标准护理相比,基于 FMF 的筛查计划可能更有效地降低 37 周前分娩的子痫前期风险。此外,与传统算法相比,FMF 算法可以提高 37 周前或 34 周前分娩的子痫前期检出率。基于人群的 FMF 筛查计划比标准护理更有效且成本更高。我们估计,在安大略省公共资助基于人群的 FMF 筛查计划将在未来 5 年内增加 8500 万美元的成本。孕妇及其家庭成员重视基于人群的 FMF 筛查计划可以提供的公平获取、信息和临床益处。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

4
[Not Available].[无可用内容]。
CMAJ. 2024 Feb 11;196(5):E172-E173. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.231568-f.

本文引用的文献

8
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.《PRISMA 2020声明:报告系统评价的更新指南》
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Jun;134:178-189. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.03.001. Epub 2021 Mar 29.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验