Heffner Jaimee L, Catz Sheryl L, Klasnja Predrag, Tiffany Brooks, McClure Jennifer B
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, United States.
Betty Irene Moore School of Nursing, University of California, Sacramento, CA, United States.
JMIR Form Res. 2020 Aug 27;4(8):e21784. doi: 10.2196/21784.
The majority of cigarette smokers want to quit someday but are not ready to commit to long-term abstinence. However, available smoking cessation treatments are not well-suited to meet the needs of these ambivalent smokers. Low-cost, high-reach mobile health (mHealth) interventions may be a cost-efficient means of offering assistance to ambivalent smokers, yet there are currently no evidence-based options available for this group.
The aim of this study was to develop and preliminarily evaluate the core content for an mHealth program targeting adult smokers who are ambivalent about quitting. The core content consisted of a series of "personal experiments" similar to those tested as part of a counseling intervention in prior work, including brief cognitive or behavioral tasks designed to boost readiness for changing smoking behavior.
We conducted individual user interviews (N=3) to refine program content, and then conducted a one-arm pilot study (N=25) to assess user receptivity and the potential impact of the experiments on motivation and self-efficacy to quit or reduce smoking.
In user interviews, participants liked the concept of the personal experiments. Participants in the pilot study found a medium-fidelity prototype to be highly acceptable. After watching a brief orientation video that explained how the program works, most participants (80%, 20/25) indicated that it sounded interesting, primarily because it did not require any commitment to quit. All participants (100%, 25/25) completed all 7 experiments, including a 24-hour quit attempt, although not all were able to refrain from smoking for a full day based on qualitative feedback on the experiment. The mean rating of usefulness of the overall program was 4.12 (SD 1.09) out of 5, and the average rating of the difficulty of the experiments was 2.16 (SD 1.18) out of 5. At the last assessment point, 92% (23/25) of the participants indicated that they were more interested in either quitting or cutting back than when they began the program, and 72% (18/25) said that if the program had included a free trial of nicotine replacement therapy, they would have used it to try to quit smoking.
This formative work confirmed that ambivalent smokers are willing to use and will remain engaged with an mHealth intervention that employs the novel concept of personal experiments to enhance their motivation for and ability to quit smoking. The addition of action-oriented treatment (self-help and free nicotine replacement therapy, quitline referral) could further support users' efforts to stop smoking and remain quit.
大多数吸烟者都希望有朝一日能戒烟,但尚未准备好承诺长期戒烟。然而,现有的戒烟治疗方法并不十分适合满足这些矛盾吸烟者的需求。低成本、高覆盖率的移动健康(mHealth)干预措施可能是为矛盾吸烟者提供帮助的一种经济有效的方式,但目前尚无基于证据的方案可供该群体使用。
本研究的目的是开发并初步评估一个针对对戒烟矛盾的成年吸烟者的移动健康项目的核心内容。核心内容包括一系列“个人实验”,类似于先前工作中作为咨询干预一部分进行测试的实验,包括旨在提高改变吸烟行为准备度的简短认知或行为任务。
我们进行了个体用户访谈(N = 3)以完善项目内容,然后进行了一项单组试点研究(N = 25),以评估用户接受度以及这些实验对戒烟或减少吸烟动机和自我效能的潜在影响。
在用户访谈中,参与者喜欢个人实验的概念。试点研究中的参与者发现中等保真度的原型非常容易接受。在观看了一段解释该项目如何运作的简短介绍视频后,大多数参与者(80%,20/25)表示听起来很有趣,主要是因为它不需要任何戒烟承诺。所有参与者(100%,25/25)都完成了所有7个实验,包括一次24小时的戒烟尝试,尽管根据对实验的定性反馈,并非所有人都能一整天不吸烟。该项目总体有用性的平均评分为4.12(标准差1.09)(满分5分),实验难度的平均评分为2.16(标准差1.18)(满分5分)。在最后一个评估点,92%(23/25)的参与者表示他们比开始该项目时对戒烟或减少吸烟更感兴趣,72%(18/25)表示如果该项目包括尼古丁替代疗法的免费试用,他们会用它来尝试戒烟。
这项形成性工作证实,矛盾吸烟者愿意使用并会继续参与一项采用个人实验这一新颖概念来增强他们戒烟动机和能力的移动健康干预措施。增加以行动为导向的治疗(自助和免费尼古丁替代疗法、戒烟热线转诊)可以进一步支持用户戒烟并保持戒烟状态的努力。