• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在线除皱术患者信息的可读性评估。

Readability Assessment of Online Rhytidectomy Patient Information.

机构信息

Samir A. Ballestas, MD, is a resident at the Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.

Roberto M. Soriano, MD, is a post doctoral research fellow at the Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.

出版信息

Plast Surg Nurs. 2020 Jul/Sep;40(3):145-149. doi: 10.1097/PSN.0000000000000311.

DOI:10.1097/PSN.0000000000000311
PMID:32852441
Abstract

Patients frequently access online resources for medical information. The National Institutes of Health and the American Medical Association recommend that to be understood by the average American, patient information should be presented at or below the sixth to seventh academic grade level. The popularity of rhytidectomy (facelift) is rising, and providers are frequently using the Internet to attract patients. All rhytidectomy information provided by 100 private practice Web sites in New York City, Los Angeles, Chicago, Houston, and Phoenix was analyzed using Readable.io software. The information was also assessed using the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, Gunning-Fog Index, Coleman-Liau Index, Simple Measure of Gobbledygook, Automated Readability Index, Flesch Reading Ease Score, and Fry Reading Graph tools. Analyzed material was written at a higher academic grade level than recommended for the average American. The overall average grade level was 10.99 ± 1.39. Online patient education materials about rhytidectomy provided by private practice clinics in 5 major cities of the United States were written at academic grade levels above the National Institutes of Health and American Medical Association recommended levels. This may lead to rhytidectomy patients having unrealistic or inaccurate expectations related to their surgical procedure.

摘要

患者经常访问在线资源以获取医疗信息。美国国立卫生研究院和美国医学协会建议,为了让普通美国人能够理解,患者信息应呈现为六年级至七年级的学术水平或以下。除皱术(面部拉皮术)的普及程度正在上升,提供者经常使用互联网来吸引患者。使用 Readable.io 软件分析了纽约市、洛杉矶、芝加哥、休斯顿和凤凰城的 100 家私人诊所的所有除皱术信息。还使用 Flesch-Kincaid 年级水平、Gunning-Fog 指数、Coleman-Liau 指数、简单胡言乱语测量、自动阅读水平指数、Flesch 阅读舒适度得分和 Fry 阅读图表工具评估了信息。分析的材料比推荐给普通美国人的学术水平要高。总体平均水平为 10.99 ± 1.39。美国 5 个主要城市的私人诊所提供的关于除皱术的在线患者教育材料的学术水平高于美国国立卫生研究院和美国医学协会推荐的水平。这可能导致除皱术患者对他们的手术产生不切实际或不准确的期望。

相似文献

1
Readability Assessment of Online Rhytidectomy Patient Information.在线除皱术患者信息的可读性评估。
Plast Surg Nurs. 2020 Jul/Sep;40(3):145-149. doi: 10.1097/PSN.0000000000000311.
2
Assessment of online patient education materials from major ophthalmologic associations.主要眼科协会在线患者教育材料评估。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 Apr;133(4):449-54. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.6104.
3
Readability assessment of the American Rhinologic Society patient education materials.美国鼻科学会患者教育材料的可读性评估。
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2013 Apr;3(4):325-33. doi: 10.1002/alr.21097. Epub 2012 Oct 8.
4
Are we effectively informing patients? A quantitative analysis of on-line patient education resources from the American Society of Neuroradiology.我们是否有效地告知了患者?对美国神经放射学会在线患者教育资源的定量分析。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014 Jul;35(7):1270-5. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3854. Epub 2014 Apr 24.
5
Readability assessment of online urology patient education materials.在线泌尿科患者教育材料的可读性评估。
J Urol. 2013 Mar;189(3):1048-52. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.255. Epub 2012 Sep 24.
6
Readability assessment of online patient education materials from academic otolaryngology-head and neck surgery departments.评估耳鼻喉-头颈外科学术部门在线患者教育材料的可读性。
Am J Otolaryngol. 2013 Jan-Feb;34(1):31-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2012.08.001. Epub 2012 Sep 5.
7
Evaluating the Readability of Online Patient Education Materials for Trigeminal Neuralgia.评估三叉神经痛在线患者教育材料的可读性。
World Neurosurg. 2020 Dec;144:e934-e938. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.09.123. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
8
Readability of online patient education materials for shoulder instability surgery in English and Spanish.英文和西班牙文的肩部不稳定手术在线患者教育材料的可读性
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024 Oct;33(10):2220-2229. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.02.028. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
9
Hand Surgery Resources Exceed American Health Literacy.手部外科资源超出美国健康素养水平。
Hand (N Y). 2018 Sep;13(5):547-551. doi: 10.1177/1558944717725384. Epub 2017 Aug 20.
10
Readability assessment of online patient resources for breast augmentation surgery.隆胸手术在线患者资源的可读性评估。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Jun;135(6):1573-1579. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001230.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the relationship between website quality and equity in living donor kidney transplant.探索活体供肾移植中网站质量与公平性之间的关系。
Front Transplant. 2024 Nov 25;3:1490876. doi: 10.3389/frtra.2024.1490876. eCollection 2024.
2
Clear as Mud: Readability Scores in Cloacal Exstrophy Literature and Its Treatment.晦涩难懂:泄殖腔外翻文献及其治疗中的可读性评分
Res Rep Urol. 2024 Feb 12;16:39-44. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S430744. eCollection 2024.