National Institute of Nursing Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Institute for Social Science Research, University of Queensland, Brisbane.
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Aug 3;3(8):e2013191. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.13191.
Identifying plasma biomarkers associated with the amount of time an athlete may need before they return to sport (RTS) following a sport-related concussion (SRC) is important because it may help to improve the health and safety of athletes.
To examine whether plasma biomarkers can differentiate collegiate athletes who RTS in less than 14 days or 14 days or more following SRC.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This multicenter prospective diagnostic study, conducted by the National Collegiate Athletics Association-Department of Defense Concussion Assessment, Research, and Education Consortium, included 127 male and female athletes who had sustained an SRC while enrolled at 6 Concussion Assessment, Research, and Education Consortium Advanced Research Core sites as well as 2 partial-Advanced Research Core military service academies. Data were collected between February 2015 and May 2018. Athletes with SRC completed clinical testing and blood collection at preseason (baseline), postinjury (0-21 hours), 24 to 48 hours postinjury, time of symptom resolution, and 7 days after unrestricted RTS.
A total of 3 plasma biomarkers (ie, total tau protein, glial fibrillary acidic protein [GFAP], and neurofilament light chain protein [Nf-L]) were measured using an ultrasensitive single molecule array technology and were included in the final analysis. RTS was examined between athletes who took less than 14 days vs those who took 14 days or more to RTS following SRC. Linear mixed models were used to identify significant interactions between period by RTS group. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were conducted to examine whether these plasma biomarkers could discriminate between RTS groups.
The 127 participants had a mean (SD) age of 18.9 (1.3) years, and 97 (76.4%) were men; 65 (51.2%) took less than 14 days to RTS, and 62 (48.8%) took 14 days or more to RTS. Linear mixed models identified significant associations for both mean (SE) plasma total tau (24-48 hours postinjury, <14 days RTS vs ≥14 days RTS: -0.65 [0.12] pg/mL vs -0.14 [0.14] pg/mL; P = .008) and GFAP (postinjury, 14 days RTS vs ≥14 days RTS: 4.72 [0.12] pg/mL vs 4.39 [0.11] pg/mL; P = .04). Total tau at the time of symptom resolution had acceptable discrimination power (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.63-0.86; P < .001). We also examined a combined plasma biomarker panel that incorporated Nf-L, GFAP, and total tau at each period to discriminate RTS groups. Although the analyses did reach significance at each time period when combined, results indicated that they were poor at distinguishing the groups (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, <0.7).
The findings of this study suggest that measures of total tau and GFAP may identify athletes who will require more time to RTS. However, further research is needed to improve our ability to determine recovery following an SRC.
重要性:识别与运动员在运动相关脑震荡 (SRC) 后重返运动 (RTS) 所需时间相关的血浆生物标志物非常重要,因为这可能有助于提高运动员的健康和安全。
目的:研究血浆生物标志物是否可以区分在 SRC 后少于 14 天或 14 天或更长时间内 RTS 的大学生运动员。
设计、地点和参与者:这项由全国大学生体育协会-国防部脑震荡评估、研究和教育联合会进行的多中心前瞻性诊断研究,纳入了 127 名在 6 个脑震荡评估、研究和教育联合会高级研究核心场所以及 2 个部分高级研究核心军事院校注册的男性和女性运动员。数据收集于 2015 年 2 月至 2018 年 5 月之间。SRC 后运动员在赛前(基线)、受伤后(0-21 小时)、受伤后 24 至 48 小时、症状缓解时和无限制 RTS 后 7 天进行临床测试和血液采集。
主要结果和措施:使用超灵敏单分子阵列技术共测量了 3 种血浆生物标志物(即总 tau 蛋白、神经胶质纤维酸性蛋白 [GFAP] 和神经丝轻链蛋白 [Nf-L]),并纳入最终分析。研究了在 SRC 后少于 14 天与 14 天或更长时间 RTS 的运动员之间的 RTS。线性混合模型用于识别 RTS 组之间的显著交互作用。进行了接收者操作特征曲线下面积分析,以检查这些血浆生物标志物是否可以区分 RTS 组。
结果:127 名参与者的平均(SD)年龄为 18.9(1.3)岁,97 名(76.4%)为男性;65 名(51.2%)少于 14 天 RTS,62 名(48.8%)需要 14 天或更长时间 RTS。线性混合模型确定了血浆总 tau 的平均值(SE)(受伤后 24-48 小时,<14 天 RTS 与≥14 天 RTS:-0.65[0.12] pg/mL 与-0.14[0.14] pg/mL;P=0.008)和 GFAP(受伤时,14 天 RTS 与≥14 天 RTS:4.72[0.12] pg/mL 与 4.39[0.11] pg/mL;P=0.04)的显著关联。症状缓解时总 tau 的区分能力具有可接受的能力(接受者操作特征曲线下面积,0.75;95%CI,0.63-0.86;P<0.001)。我们还检查了一个综合血浆生物标志物面板,该面板在每个时期都纳入了 Nf-L、GFAP 和总 tau,以区分 RTS 组。尽管在每个时期的分析都达到了显著性,但结果表明它们在区分这些组方面效果不佳(接受者操作特征曲线下面积,<0.7)。
结论和相关性:这项研究的结果表明,总 tau 和 GFAP 的测量值可能可以识别需要更多时间 RTS 的运动员。然而,需要进一步的研究来提高我们确定 SRC 后恢复情况的能力。