Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphofunctional Imaging, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Italian Society of Pharmacology, Milan, Italy.
Drug Saf. 2020 Dec;43(12):1297-1308. doi: 10.1007/s40264-020-00994-5.
The epidemic due to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection has been spreading globally, raising increasing concerns. There are several controversial hypotheses on the potentially harmful or beneficial effects of antihypertensive drugs acting on the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Furthermore, there is accumulating evidence, based on several observational studies, that angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) do not increase the risk of contracting SARS-CoV-2 infection. On the other hand, conflicting findings regarding the role of ACEIs/ARBs as prognosis modifiers in COVID-19 hospitalised patients have been reported.
The aim of this large-scale, retrospective cohort study was to investigate whether prior exposure to ACEIs and/or ARBs was associated with all-cause mortality among over 40,000 hospitalised COVID-19 patients compared with calcium channel blockers (CCBs), a potential therapeutic alternative.
This study was conducted using COVID-19 registries linked to claims databases from Lombardy, Veneto and Reggio Emilia (overall, 25% of Italian population). Overall, 42,926 patients hospitalised between 21 February and 21 April 2020 with a diagnosis of COVID-19 confirmed by real-time polymerase chain reaction tests were included in this study. All-cause mortality occurring in or out of hospital, as reported in the COVID-19 registry, was estimated. Using Cox models, adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) of all-cause mortality (along with 95% confidence intervals [CIs]) were estimated separately for ACEIs/ARBs and other antihypertensives versus CCBs and non-use.
Overall, 11,205 in- and out-of-hospital deaths occurred over a median of 24 days of follow-up after hospital admission due to COVID-19. Compared with CCBs, adjusted analyses showed no difference in the risk of death among ACEI (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.89-1.06) or ARB (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.89-1.06) users. When non-use of antihypertensives was considered as a comparator, a modest statistically significant increase in mortality risk was observed for any antihypertensive use. However, when restricting to drugs with antihypertensive indications only, these marginal increases disappeared. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses confirmed our main findings.
ACEI/ARB use is not associated with either an increased or decreased risk of all-cause mortality, compared with CCB use, in the largest cohort of hospitalised COVID-19 patients exposed to these drugs studied to date. The use of these drugs therefore does not affect the prognosis of COVID-19. This finding strengthens recommendations of international regulatory agencies about not withdrawing/switching ACEI/ARB treatments to modify COVID-19 prognosis.
由严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)感染引起的疫情在全球范围内蔓延,引起了越来越多的关注。关于作用于肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统(RAAS)的抗高血压药物在 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)中可能具有潜在有害或有益影响,存在几种有争议的假说。此外,基于几项观察性研究的证据表明,血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEIs)和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARBs)并不会增加感染 SARS-CoV-2 的风险。另一方面,有报道称 ACEI/ARB 作为 COVID-19 住院患者预后调节剂的作用存在相互矛盾的发现。
这项大规模回顾性队列研究的目的是调查与钙通道阻滞剂(CCBs)相比,在 40,000 多名 COVID-19 住院患者中,先前暴露于 ACEIs 和/或 ARBs 是否与全因死亡率相关,这是一种潜在的治疗替代方法。
本研究使用 COVID-19 登记处与伦巴第、威尼托和艾米利亚-罗马涅(总体上占意大利人口的 25%)的索赔数据库相关联进行。共有 42,926 名 2020 年 2 月 21 日至 4 月 21 日期间因实时聚合酶链反应检测确诊 COVID-19 而住院的患者被纳入本研究。根据 COVID-19 登记处报告,估计全因死亡率(包括住院内和住院外)。使用 Cox 模型,分别针对 ACEI/ARB 和其他抗高血压药与 CCB 和非使用,估计全因死亡率(以及 95%置信区间[CI])的调整后的危险比(HR)。
总体而言,在因 COVID-19 住院后的中位 24 天随访期间,共发生 11,205 例住院内和住院外死亡。与 CCB 相比,ACEI(HR 0.97,95%CI 0.89-1.06)或 ARB(HR 0.98,95%CI 0.89-1.06)使用者的死亡风险无差异。当将不使用抗高血压药物作为对照时,观察到任何抗高血压药物使用的死亡率风险适度统计学显著增加。然而,当仅限制用于具有抗高血压适应症的药物时,这些边缘增加消失了。敏感性和亚组分析证实了我们的主要发现。
与使用 CCB 相比,在迄今研究的最大 COVID-19 住院患者队列中,ACEI/ARB 的使用与全因死亡率的增加或降低无关。因此,这些药物的使用不会影响 COVID-19 的预后。这一发现加强了国际监管机构关于不撤回/转换 ACEI/ARB 治疗以改变 COVID-19 预后的建议。