Usefulness of combined endobronchial and endoscopic ultrasound-guided needle aspiration in the diagnosis of sarcoidosis: a prospective multicenter trial.

INTRODUCTION

Needle biopsy of enlarged lymph nodes is an accepted method for the diagnostic workup of sarcoidosis, but the optimal endosonography‑guided approach is yet to be determined.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of our study was to assess the relative diagnostic yield of combined ultrasound‑guided needle aspiration (CUS‑b‑NA), which includes endobronchial ultrasound‑guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS‑TBNA) with endoscopic ultrasound fine‑needle aspiration (EUS‑b‑FNA), as well as the role of the cell block (CB) technique and lymph node localization in the diagnostic workup of sarcoidosis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a prospective multicenter study including consecutive patients with clinical suspicion of stage I or II sarcoidosis. CUS‑b‑NA with smears and CB technique were performed in the whole study group. If a biopsy result was not conclusive, an invasive diagnostic workup and a 6-month follow‑up were scheduled.

RESULTS

Out of 77 screened patients, 54 signed written consent and 50 were enrolled for the final analysis. The overall sensitivity of EBUS‑TBNA, EUS‑b‑FNA, and CUS‑b‑NA was 76.6%, 70.2%, and 91.7%, respectively. There were no differences between EBUS‑TBNA and EUS‑b‑FNA (P = 0.52) but CUS‑b‑NA had a higher diagnostic yield (P = 0.005 and P = 0.001, respectively). Adding the CB method to smear technique (P = 0.008) and biopsy of the subcarinal lymph nodes increased the diagnostic yield (P = 0.001).  Conclusions: The diagnostic yield of CUS‑b‑NA is higher than that of endosonographic techniques alone in the diagnostic workup of stage I and II sarcoidosis. The preparation of cytological material including CB and the choice of the subcarinal lymph node station for the biopsy increase the diagnostic efficacy.