Suppr超能文献

电子心理健康干预在进食障碍治疗和预防中的应用:一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。

E-mental health interventions for the treatment and prevention of eating disorders: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

School of Psychology.

School of Science, Engineering and Information Technology.

出版信息

J Consult Clin Psychol. 2020 Nov;88(11):994-1007. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000575. Epub 2020 Aug 27.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

E-mental health (digital) interventions can help overcome existing barriers that stand in the way of people receiving help for an eating disorder (ED). Although e-mental health interventions for treating and preventing EDs have been met with enthusiasm, earlier reviews brought attention to poor quality of evidence, and offered solutions to enhance their evidence base. To assess developments in the field, we conducted an updated meta-analysis on the efficacy of e-mental health interventions for treating and preventing EDs, paying attention to whether trial quality and outcomes have improved in recent trials. We also assessed whether user-centered design principles have been implemented in existing digital interventions.

METHOD

Four databases were searched for RCTs of digital interventions for treating and preventing EDs. Thirty-six RCTs (28 prevention- and 8 treatment-focused) were included.

RESULTS

Some evidence that study quality improved in recent prevention-focused trials was found. Few trials involved the end-user in the design or development stage of the intervention. Issues with intervention engagement were noted, and 1 in 4 participants dropped out from prevention- and treatment-focused trials. Digital interventions were more effective than control conditions in reducing established risk factors and symptoms in prevention- ( = 0.19 to 0.43) and treatment-focused trials ( = 0.29 to 0.69), respectively. Effect sizes have not increased in recent trials. Few trials compared a digital intervention with a face-to-face intervention. Whether digital interventions can prevent ED onset is unclear.

CONCLUSION

Digital interventions are a promising approach to ED treatment and prevention, but improvements are still needed. Three key recommendations are provided. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

目的

电子心理健康(数字)干预措施可以帮助克服人们获得饮食障碍(ED)帮助的现有障碍。尽管针对治疗和预防 ED 的电子心理健康干预措施受到了欢迎,但早期的评论引起了对证据质量差的关注,并提出了提高其证据基础的解决方案。为了评估该领域的发展,我们对治疗和预防 ED 的电子心理健康干预措施的疗效进行了更新的荟萃分析,特别注意最近的试验中试验质量和结果是否有所改善。我们还评估了以用户为中心的设计原则是否已应用于现有的数字干预措施中。

方法

在四个数据库中搜索了治疗和预防 ED 的数字干预措施的 RCT。纳入了 36 项 RCT(28 项预防和 8 项治疗重点)。

结果

发现了一些证据表明,最近的预防重点试验中研究质量有所提高。很少有试验让最终用户参与干预措施的设计或开发阶段。干预措施的参与问题值得关注,四分之一的预防和治疗重点试验的参与者退出。数字干预措施在预防( = 0.19 至 0.43)和治疗( = 0.29 至 0.69)试验中均比对照组更有效,分别降低了已确定的危险因素和症状。最近的试验中,效果大小并没有增加。很少有试验将数字干预与面对面干预进行比较。数字干预是否可以预防 ED 发作尚不清楚。

结论

数字干预措施是治疗和预防 ED 的一种有前途的方法,但仍需改进。提出了三个关键建议。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2020 APA,保留所有权利)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验