Farfan Mauricio J, Torres Juan P, O'Ryan Miguel, Olivares Mauricio, Gallardo Pablo, Lastra Jorge, Salas Carolina
Hospital Dr. Luis Calvo Mackenna, Santiago, Chile.
Departamento de Pediatría y Cirugía Infantil Oriente, Hospital Dr. Luis Calvo Mackenna, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Rev Chilena Infectol. 2020 Jun;37(3):276-280. doi: 10.4067/s0716-10182020000300276.
The global shortage of reagents and kits for nucleic acid extraction and molecular detection of SARS-CoV-2 requires new cost-effective strategies for the diagnosis of suspected COVID-19 cases, especially in countries that need to increase detection capacity. Pooled nucleic acid testing has been extensively used as a cost-effective strategy for HIV, HepB, HepC and influenza. Also, protocols dispensing of RNA extraction appears as an attractive option for detection of SARS-CoV-2. In this study, we found that pooling of 5 samples showed that CT variations were in the range of 1.0-4,5 units, with less likelihood of a false negative result. Results of the sample without nucleic acid ex-traction, was unsatisfactory, with a significant increase in CT values, and thus for risk of a false negative result. In conclusion, pooling nasopharyngeal samples with both automated and manual extraction proved reliable, and thus a potential efficient alternative for the diagnosis of suspected COVID-19 in developing countries.
全球范围内严重缺乏用于严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)核酸提取和分子检测的试剂与试剂盒,这就需要新的具有成本效益的策略来诊断疑似新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)病例,尤其是在那些需要提高检测能力的国家。混合核酸检测已被广泛用作一种具有成本效益的策略,用于检测艾滋病毒、乙肝病毒、丙肝病毒和流感。此外,省略RNA提取的方案似乎是检测SARS-CoV-2的一个有吸引力的选择。在本研究中,我们发现将5个样本混合后,CT值变化范围为1.0 - 4.5个单位,假阴性结果的可能性较小。未进行核酸提取的样本结果并不理想,CT值显著升高,因此存在假阴性结果的风险。总之,无论是采用自动提取还是手动提取方式,将鼻咽样本混合检测都被证明是可靠的,因此有可能成为发展中国家诊断疑似COVID-19的一种高效替代方法。