Suppr超能文献

供医疗专业人员和患者管理心房颤动的移动健康应用程序:一项系统综述。

Mobile health applications for managing atrial fibrillation for healthcare professionals and patients: a systematic review.

作者信息

Lane Deirdre A, McMahon Naoimh, Gibson Josephine, Weldon Jo C, Farkowski Michal M, Lenarczyk Radoslaw, Watkins Caroline L, Dilaveris Polychronis, Caiani Enrico G, Potpara Tatjana S

机构信息

Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Liverpool and Liverpool Heart & Chest Hospital, Liverpool L7 8TX, UK.

Faculty of Health and Wellbeing, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.

出版信息

Europace. 2020 Aug 27. doi: 10.1093/europace/euaa269.

Abstract

AIMS

A plethora of mobile health applications (m-health apps) to support healthcare are available for both patients and healthcare professionals (HCPs) but content and quality vary considerably and few have undergone formal assessment. The aim is to systematically review the literature on m-health apps for managing atrial fibrillation (AF) that examine the impact on knowledge of AF, patient and HCP behaviour, patients' quality-of-life, and user engagement.

METHODS AND RESULTS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PsychInfo were searched from 1 January 2005 to 5 September 2019, with hand-searching of clinical trial registers and grey literature. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they reported changes in any of the following: (i) knowledge of AF; (ii) provider behaviour (e.g. guideline adherence); (iii) patient behaviour (e.g. medication adherence); (iv) patient quality-of-life; and (v) user engagement. Two reviewers independently assessed articles for eligibility. A narrative review was undertaken as included studies varied widely in their design, interventions, comparators, and outcomes. Seven studies were included; six m-health apps aimed at patients and one at HCPs. Mobile health apps ranged widely in design, features, and method of delivery. Four studies reported patient knowledge of AF; three demonstrated significant knowledge improvement post-intervention or compared to usual care. One study reported greater HCP adherence to oral anticoagulation guidelines after m-health app implementation. Two studies reported on patient medication adherence and quality-of-life; both showed improved quality-of-life post-intervention but only one observed increased adherence. Regarding user engagement, five studies reported patient perspectives on usability, three on acceptability, and one on feasibility; overall all m-health apps were rated positively.

CONCLUSION

Mobile health apps demonstrate improvements in patient knowledge, behaviour, and quality of life. Studies formally evaluating the impact of m-health on HCP behaviour are scarce and larger-scale studies with representative patient cohorts, appropriate comparators, and longer-term assessment of the impact of m-health apps are warranted.

摘要

目的

有大量支持医疗保健的移动健康应用程序(移动医疗应用)可供患者和医疗保健专业人员使用,但内容和质量差异很大,很少有经过正式评估的。目的是系统回顾关于用于管理心房颤动(房颤)的移动医疗应用的文献,这些文献研究了对房颤知识、患者和医疗保健专业人员行为、患者生活质量以及用户参与度的影响。

方法和结果

检索了2005年1月1日至2019年9月5日期间的MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL和PsychInfo,并手工检索了临床试验注册库和灰色文献。如果研究报告了以下任何一项的变化,则有资格纳入:(i)房颤知识;(ii)提供者行为(如遵循指南情况);(iii)患者行为(如药物依从性);(iv)患者生活质量;以及(v)用户参与度。两名评审员独立评估文章的纳入资格。由于纳入的研究在设计、干预措施、对照和结果方面差异很大,因此进行了叙述性综述。共纳入7项研究;6项移动医疗应用针对患者,1项针对医疗保健专业人员。移动医疗应用在设计、功能和交付方式上差异很大。4项研究报告了患者的房颤知识;3项研究表明干预后或与常规护理相比知识有显著改善。1项研究报告在实施移动医疗应用后医疗保健专业人员对口服抗凝指南的遵循情况有所提高。2项研究报告了患者的药物依从性和生活质量;两项研究均显示干预后生活质量有所改善,但只有1项观察到依从性增加。关于用户参与度,5项研究报告了患者对可用性的看法,3项报告了可接受性,1项报告了可行性;总体而言,所有移动医疗应用的评分均为正面。

结论

移动医疗应用在患者知识、行为和生活质量方面有改善。正式评估移动医疗对医疗保健专业人员行为影响的研究很少,有必要开展具有代表性患者队列、合适对照以及对移动医疗应用影响进行长期评估的更大规模研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验