• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

模仿反目标行为:心理距离和建构水平的作用。

Imitation of counter-goal behavior: The role of psychological distance and level of construal.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Salzburg, Austria.

Department of Psychology, University of Salzburg, Austria.

出版信息

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2020 Oct;210:103164. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103164. Epub 2020 Aug 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103164
PMID:32853904
Abstract

Previous research has demonstrated that individuals are more likely to engage in imitation of movements when the observed behavior is psychologically proximal. The present research tested whether movement imitation of proximal behavior is increased even when imitation is in conflict with own task goals. Participants completed a connect-the-dots task that was presented as either a speed task or an accuracy task. Additionally, participants watched a video of a person modeling the solution to the task in a way that contradicted the stated goal. Temporal distance to the model was manipulated in Experiment 1. Participants imitated the model's way to solve the task more when the model was proximal and followed the task goal comparably more when the model was distant. Experiment 2 replicated the effect with a direct mindset manipulation and additionally ruled out an alternative explanation (i.e., a stronger goal focus when thinking abstractly).

摘要

先前的研究表明,当观察到的行为在心理上更接近时,个体更有可能进行模仿。本研究测试了即使模仿与自己的任务目标相冲突,是否仍然会增加对近端行为的模仿。参与者完成了一个连线任务,该任务被呈现为速度任务或准确性任务。此外,参与者观看了一个人以与既定目标相矛盾的方式解决任务的视频。在实验 1 中,对模型的时间距离进行了操作。当模型较近时,参与者更倾向于模仿模型解决任务的方式,而当模型较远时,参与者更倾向于遵循任务目标。实验 2 用直接的思维模式操作复制了这种效果,并排除了另一种解释(即,当抽象思考时,目标的关注更强)。

相似文献

1
Imitation of counter-goal behavior: The role of psychological distance and level of construal.模仿反目标行为:心理距离和建构水平的作用。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2020 Oct;210:103164. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103164. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
2
Psychological distance reduces literal imitation: Evidence from an imitation-learning paradigm.心理距离会减少字面模仿:来自模仿学习范式的证据。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Mar;42(3):320-30. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000150. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
3
Psychological distance modulates goal-based versus movement-based imitation.心理距离调节基于目标的模仿和基于运动的模仿。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2019 Aug;45(8):1031-1048. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000654. Epub 2019 May 27.
4
Group membership does not modulate goal- versus movement-based imitation.群体成员身份不会调节基于目标与基于动作的模仿。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2023 Apr;76(4):827-837. doi: 10.1177/17470218221132842. Epub 2022 Nov 21.
5
The role of context in "over-imitation": Evidence of movement-based goal inference in young children.语境在“过度模仿”中的作用:幼儿基于动作的目标推理的证据。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2020 Feb;190:104713. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2019.104713. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
6
Action generation and action perception in imitation: an instance of the ideomotor principle.模仿中的动作生成与动作感知:观念运动原则的一个实例。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2003 Mar 29;358(1431):501-15. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2002.1257.
7
The effect of psychological distance on automatic goal contagion.心理距离对目标自动感染的影响。
Compr Results Soc Psychol. 2016 Sep 1;1(1-3):51-85. doi: 10.1080/23743603.2017.1288877. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
8
The influence of goals on movement kinematics during imitation.目标对模仿运动动作学的影响。
Exp Brain Res. 2010 Jul;204(3):353-60. doi: 10.1007/s00221-009-2034-8. Epub 2009 Oct 14.
9
Is automatic imitation based on goal coding or movement coding? A comparison of goal-directed and goal-less actions.自动模仿是基于目标编码还是动作编码?目标导向动作与无目标动作的比较。
Exp Psychol. 2013;60(3):213-25. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000190.
10
The Snacking Chameleon: Psychological Proximity Increases Imitation of Food Intake Independently of Brand Choice.零食变色龙:心理亲近感会增加对食物摄入量的模仿,且与品牌选择无关。
Foods. 2020 Feb 21;9(2):228. doi: 10.3390/foods9020228.