文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

即时检测平台对神经胶质纤维酸性蛋白与 S100 钙结合蛋白 B 进行血液生物标志物检测,以预测创伤性脑损伤:创伤性脑损伤研究中的转化研究和临床知识。

Point-of-Care Platform Blood Biomarker Testing of Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein versus S100 Calcium-Binding Protein B for Prediction of Traumatic Brain Injuries: A Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury Study.

机构信息

Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

出版信息

J Neurotrauma. 2020 Dec 1;37(23):2460-2467. doi: 10.1089/neu.2020.7140. Epub 2020 Sep 14.


DOI:10.1089/neu.2020.7140
PMID:32854584
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7698990/
Abstract

Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) is cleared by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to determine need for head computed tomography (CT) within 12 h after mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) (Glasgow Coma Score [GCS] 13-15); S100 calcium-binding protein B (S100B) serves this function in Europe. This phase 1 biomarker cohort analysis of the multi-center, observational Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury (TRACK-TBI) study compares GFAP's diagnostic performance, measured on a rapid point-of-care platform, against protein S100B to predict intracranial abnormalities on CT within 24 h post-injury across the spectrum of TBI (GCS 3-15). Head CT scan performed in TBI subjects and blood was collected for all consenting subjects presenting to 18 United States level 1 trauma centers. Plasma was analyzed on a point-of-care device prototype assay for GFAP and serum was analyzed for S100B. In 1359 patients with TBI (GCS 3-15), mean (standard deviation [SD]) age = 40.1 (17.0) years; 68% were male. Plasma GFAP levels were significantly higher in CT+ TBI subjects (median = 1358 pg/mL, interquartile range [IQR]: 472-3803) than in CT- TBI subjects (median = 116 pg/mL, IQR: 26-397) or orthopedic trauma controls ( = 122; median = 13 pg/mL, IQR: 7-20),  < 0.001. Serum S100B levels were likewise higher in CT+ TBI subjects (median = 0.17 μg/L, IQR: 0.09-0.38) than in CT- TBI subjects (median = 0.10 μg/L, IQR: 0.06-0.18),  < 0.001. Receiver operating characteristic curves were generated for prediction of intracranial injury on admission CT scan; area under the curve (AUC) for GFAP was significantly higher than for S100B in the same cohort (GFAP AUC - 0.85, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.83-0.87; S100B AUC - 0.67, 95% CI 0.64-0.70;  < 0.001). GFAP, measured on a point-of-care platform prototype assay, has high discriminative ability to predict intracranial abnormalities on CT scan in patients with TBI across the full injury spectrum of GCS 3-15 through 24 h post-injury. GFAP substantially outperforms S100B.

摘要

胶质纤维酸性蛋白(GFAP)已通过美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)批准,用于在轻度创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后 12 小时内确定是否需要进行头部计算机断层扫描(CT)(格拉斯哥昏迷评分[GCS] 13-15);在欧洲,S100 钙结合蛋白 B(S100B)则用于此功能。这项多中心观察性转化研究和临床知识在创伤性脑损伤(TRACK-TBI)研究的 1 期生物标志物队列分析比较了 GFAP 的诊断性能,该性能是在快速床边检测平台上测量的,用于预测 GCS 为 3-15 的 TBI 患者在受伤后 24 小时内 CT 上颅内异常的情况。在出现 TBI 的患者中进行头部 CT 扫描,并在所有同意的患者中采集血液,这些患者均来自 18 个美国 1 级创伤中心。在床边原型检测设备上对血浆进行 GFAP 分析,对血清进行 S100B 分析。在 1359 名 GCS 为 3-15 的 TBI 患者中,平均(标准差[SD])年龄为 40.1(17.0)岁;68%为男性。CT+TBI 患者的血浆 GFAP 水平明显高于 CT-TBI 患者(中位数=1358pg/ml,四分位距[IQR]:472-3803)和骨科创伤对照组(中位数=122pg/ml,IQR:13-20),  < 0.001。CT+TBI 患者的血清 S100B 水平也高于 CT-TBI 患者(中位数=0.17μg/L,IQR:0.09-0.38),  < 0.001。为预测入院 CT 扫描中的颅内损伤,生成了受试者工作特征曲线;在同一队列中,GFAP 的曲线下面积(AUC)明显高于 S100B(GFAP AUC-0.85,95%置信区间[CI]0.83-0.87;S100B AUC-0.67,95%CI0.64-0.70;  < 0.001)。在 GCS 为 3-15 的 TBI 患者中,使用床边原型检测设备检测 GFAP,具有较高的鉴别能力,可预测受伤后 24 小时内 CT 扫描上的颅内异常。GFAP 显著优于 S100B。

相似文献

[1]
Point-of-Care Platform Blood Biomarker Testing of Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein versus S100 Calcium-Binding Protein B for Prediction of Traumatic Brain Injuries: A Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury Study.

J Neurotrauma. 2020-12-1

[2]
Diagnostic Utility of Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein Beyond 12 Hours After Traumatic Brain Injury: A TRACK-TBI Study.

J Neurotrauma. 2024-6

[3]
Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP) Outperforms S100 Calcium-Binding Protein B (S100B) and Ubiquitin C-Terminal Hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1) as Predictor for Positive Computed Tomography of the Head in Trauma Subjects.

World Neurosurg. 2019-5-1

[4]
In Children and Youth with Mild and Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury, Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein Out-Performs S100β in Detecting Traumatic Intracranial Lesions on Computed Tomography.

J Neurotrauma. 2016-1-1

[5]
Screening Performance of S100 Calcium-Binding Protein B, Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein, and Ubiquitin C-Terminal Hydrolase L1 for Intracranial Injury Within Six Hours of Injury and Beyond.

J Neurotrauma. 2024-2

[6]
Diagnostic accuracy of prehospital serum S100B and GFAP in patients with mild traumatic brain injury: a prospective observational multicenter cohort study - "the PreTBI I study".

Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2021-6-2

[7]
Association between plasma GFAP concentrations and MRI abnormalities in patients with CT-negative traumatic brain injury in the TRACK-TBI cohort: a prospective multicentre study.

Lancet Neurol. 2019-8-23

[8]
Blood biomarkers on admission in acute traumatic brain injury: Relations to severity, CT findings and care path in the CENTER-TBI study.

EBioMedicine. 2020-6

[9]
Association of Very Early Serum Levels of S100B, Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein, Ubiquitin C-Terminal Hydrolase-L1, and Spectrin Breakdown Product with Outcome in ProTECT III.

J Neurotrauma. 2019-7-9

[10]
The Levels of Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein and Ubiquitin C-Terminal Hydrolase-L1 During the First Week After a Traumatic Brain Injury: Correlations With Clinical and Imaging Findings.

Neurosurgery. 2016-9

引用本文的文献

[1]
Blood Biomarkers as Optimization Tools for Computed Tomography in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Management in Emergency Departments: A Systematic Review.

J Pers Med. 2025-8-3

[2]
Biomarkers of traumatic brain injury: narrative review and future prospects in neurointensive care.

Front Med (Lausanne). 2025-6-3

[3]
Bridging neuro-biomarkers and MR imaging: The synergistic role of glial fibrillary acidic protein in early CNS disease diagnosis.

IBRO Neurosci Rep. 2025-5-3

[4]
Implications and pathophysiology of neuroinflammation in pediatric patients with traumatic brain injury: an updated review.

Front Neurosci. 2025-4-15

[5]
Global, regional, and national burdens of traumatic brain injury from 1990 to 2021.

Front Public Health. 2025-4-14

[6]
Early Blood Biomarkers and MRI Injury After Cardiac Arrest: Secondary Analysis of the 2017-2020 Personalized Outcomes After Child Cardiac Arrest Study.

Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2025-7-1

[7]
Fluid biomarkers for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Neurosurg Rev. 2025-2-13

[8]
Accuracy of GFAP and UCH-L1 in predicting brain abnormalities on CT scans after mild traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025-1-24

[9]
Serum glial fibrillary acidic protein in acute stroke: feasibility to determine stroke-type, timeline and tissue-impact.

Front Neurol. 2024-12-6

[10]
Optical coherence tomography (OCT) and OCT angiography: Technological development and applications in brain science.

Theranostics. 2025-1-1

本文引用的文献

[1]
Association between plasma GFAP concentrations and MRI abnormalities in patients with CT-negative traumatic brain injury in the TRACK-TBI cohort: a prospective multicentre study.

Lancet Neurol. 2019-8-23

[2]
Serum GFAP and UCH-L1 for prediction of absence of intracranial injuries on head CT (ALERT-TBI): a multicentre observational study.

Lancet Neurol. 2018-7-24

[3]
A review of the clinical utility of serum S100B protein levels in the assessment of traumatic brain injury.

Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2017-2

[4]
Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein and Ubiquitin C-Terminal Hydrolase-L1 Are Not Specific Biomarkers for Mild CT-Negative Traumatic Brain Injury.

J Neurotrauma. 2017-1-27

[5]
The addition of S100B to guidelines for management of mild head injury is potentially cost saving.

BMC Neurol. 2016-10-20

[6]
Emergency Department Evaluation of Traumatic Brain Injury in the United States, 2009-2010.

J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2016

[7]
Measurement of the glial fibrillary acidic protein and its breakdown products GFAP-BDP biomarker for the detection of traumatic brain injury compared to computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.

J Neurotrauma. 2015-4-15

[8]
Transforming research and clinical knowledge in traumatic brain injury pilot: multicenter implementation of the common data elements for traumatic brain injury.

J Neurotrauma. 2013-9-24

[9]
GFAP-BDP as an acute diagnostic marker in traumatic brain injury: results from the prospective transforming research and clinical knowledge in traumatic brain injury study.

J Neurotrauma. 2013-8-1

[10]
Scandinavian guidelines for initial management of minimal, mild and moderate head injuries in adults: an evidence and consensus-based update.

BMC Med. 2013-2-25

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索