MD, Department of Anaesthesia, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
MLIS, Information Specialist, Sidney Liswood Health Science Library, Sinai Health System, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 Aug 27;20(1):216. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-01135-2.
Airway guidelines recommend an emergency surgical airway as a potential life-saving treatment in a "Can't Intubate, Can't Oxygenate" (CICO) situation. Surgical airways can be achieved either through a cricothyroidotomy or tracheostomy. The current literature has limited data regarding complications of cricothyroidotomy and tracheostomy in an emergency situation. The objective of this systematic review is to analyze complications following cricothyroidotomy and tracheostomy in airway emergencies.
This synthesis of literature was exempt from ethics approval. Eight databases were searched from inception to October 2018, using a comprehensive search strategy. Studies were included if they were randomized controlled trials or observational studies reporting complications following emergency surgical airway. Complications were classified as minor (evolving to spontaneous remission or not requiring intervention or not persisting chronically), major (requiring intervention or persisting chronically), early (from the start of the procedure up to 7 days) and late (beyond 7 days of the procedure).
We retrieved 2659 references from our search criteria. Following the removal of duplicates, title and abstract review, 33 articles were selected for full-text reading. Twenty-one articles were finally included in the systematic review. We found no differences in minor, major or early complications between the two techniques. However, late complications were significantly more frequent in the tracheostomy group [OR (95% CI) 0.21 (0.20-0.22), p < 0.0001].
Our results demonstrate that cricothyroidotomies performed in emergent situations resulted in fewer late complications than tracheostomies. This finding supports the recommendations from the latest Difficult Airway Society (DAS) guidelines regarding using cricothyroidotomy as the technique of choice for emergency surgical airway. However, emergency cricothyroidotomies should be converted to tracheostomies in a timely fashion as there is insufficient evidence to suggest that emergency cricothyrotomies are long term airways.
气道指南建议在“无法插管,无法给氧”(CICO)的情况下,将紧急外科气道作为一种潜在的救生治疗方法。外科气道可以通过环甲切开术或气管切开术来实现。目前关于紧急情况下环甲切开术和气管切开术的并发症的文献数据有限。本系统评价的目的是分析气道急症中环甲切开术和气管切开术的并发症。
本文献综合分析免除伦理批准。从成立到 2018 年 10 月,使用全面的搜索策略,在 8 个数据库中进行了搜索。如果研究是报告紧急外科气道后并发症的随机对照试验或观察性研究,则纳入研究。并发症分为轻微(自行缓解或无需干预或不持续存在)、严重(需要干预或持续存在)、早期(从手术开始到 7 天内)和晚期(手术 7 天后)。
根据我们的检索标准,从我们的搜索标准中检索到 2659 条参考文献。在去除重复项、标题和摘要审查后,有 33 篇文章被选入全文阅读。最后有 21 篇文章被纳入系统评价。我们发现两种技术之间的轻微、严重或早期并发症没有差异。然而,气管切开组的晚期并发症明显更常见[比值比(95%置信区间)0.21(0.20-0.22),p<0.0001]。
我们的结果表明,在紧急情况下进行的环甲切开术比气管切开术导致的晚期并发症更少。这一发现支持了最新的困难气道学会(DAS)指南的建议,即使用环甲切开术作为紧急外科气道的首选技术。然而,应及时将紧急环甲切开术转换为气管切开术,因为没有足够的证据表明紧急环甲切开术是长期气道。