Department of Economics and CRIFSP-Advanced School for Health Policy, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
CRIFSP-Advanced School for Health Policy, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Aug 27;20(1):807. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05648-x.
Community care has recently been restructured with the development of Community Health Centres (CHCs), forcing a general rethink on the survival of previous organizational solutions adopted to reduce inappropriate ED access, for example Walk-in-Clinics (WiCs).
We focus on the Italian Emilia-Romagna Region that has made huge investments in CHC development, whilst failing to proceed at a uniform rate from area to area. Estimating panel count data models for the period 2015-2018, we pursue two goals. First we test the existence of a "CHC effect", choosing five urban cities with different degree of development of the CHC model and assessing whether, all else being equal, patients treated by GPs who have their premises inside the CHC show a lower need to seek inappropriate care (Aim 1). Second, we focus our attention on Walk-in-Clinics, investigating the long-established WiC in the city of Parma that currently coexists with three CHCs recently established in the same catchment area. In this case we try to assess whether, and to what extent, the progressive development of the CHCs in the city of Parma has been affecting the dynamics of WiC access (Aim 2).
As regards Aim 1, we show that CHCs reduce the probability of inappropriate patient access to emergency care. As regards Aim 2, in the city of Parma patients whose GP belongs to the CHC are less likely to visit the WiC on a workday, with no significant change during the weekend when CHCs are closed, questioning the need to maintain them both in the same area when the CHC model is fully implemented.
Our results confirm the hypothesis that expanding access to primary care settings diminishes inappropriate ED use. In addition, our findings suggest that where CHCs and WiCs coexist in the same area, it may be advisable to implement strategies that bring WiC activities into step with CHC-based general primary care reforms to avoid duplication.
随着社区卫生中心(CHC)的发展,社区护理最近进行了重组,这迫使人们对以前为减少不合理急诊就诊而采用的组织解决方案的生存进行全面重新思考,例如即到即诊诊所(WiC)。
我们专注于意大利艾米利亚-罗马涅地区,该地区在 CHC 发展方面投入了大量资金,但未能在区域之间以统一的速度推进。我们使用 2015-2018 年的面板计数数据模型进行估计,旨在实现两个目标。首先,我们测试“CHC 效应”的存在,选择五个具有不同 CHC 模型发展程度的城市,并评估在其他条件相同的情况下,在 CHC 内就诊的全科医生治疗的患者是否对不合理的护理需求较低(目标 1)。其次,我们将注意力集中在 WiC 上,研究了 Parm 市长期存在的 WiC,该 WiC目前与最近在同一流域设立的三个 CHC 并存。在这种情况下,我们试图评估 Parm 市 CHC 的逐步发展是否以及在何种程度上影响了 WiC 就诊的动态(目标 2)。
关于目标 1,我们表明 CHC 降低了不合理的急诊就诊的患者就诊概率。关于目标 2,在 Parm 市,属于 CHC 的全科医生的患者在工作日访问 WiC 的可能性较小,而在周末 CHC 关闭时则没有明显变化,这对在 CHC 模型全面实施时在同一区域同时保留两者提出了质疑。
我们的结果证实了这样的假设,即扩大初级保健服务的可及性可以减少不合理的 ED 使用。此外,我们的研究结果表明,在同一地区同时存在 CHC 和 WiC 的情况下,可能需要实施策略,使 WiC 活动与基于 CHC 的一般初级保健改革同步进行,以避免重复。