Li Tian, Sun Xiangzhou, Li Xun, He Yongzhong
Department of Urology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510700, P.R. China.
Minimally Invasive Technique and Product Translational Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510700, P.R. China.
Exp Ther Med. 2020 Oct;20(4):3330-3335. doi: 10.3892/etm.2020.9038. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
Flexible ureteroscopy lithotripsy (FURS) is the most common treatment for patients with upper urinary tract calculi (diameter, <2 cm). The purpose of this prospective study was to assess the efficacy of FURS combined with metallic ureteral stents (MUS) for the treatment of upper urinary tract calculi. A total of 38 patients with upper urinary tract calculi were recruited in the present study, to compare the efficacy between FURS and FURS combined with MUS (FURS-MUS). The results demonstrated that FURS-MUS shortened operative time compared with FURS (35.2±1.2 vs. 57.4±1.7 min, respectively; P<0.01). Data also indicated that the clearance rate in FURS-MUS and FURS was decreased from 94.5 and 87.8%, respectively (P<0.05). FURS-MUS treatment decreased the duration of postoperative hospital stay compared with FURS (4.5±0.5 vs. 7.5±1.5 days, respectively; P<0.05). These data demonstrated that FURS-MUS significantly increased postoperative inflammation score compared with FURS (6.2±0.8 vs. 4.2±1.0, respectively; P<0.05). The complication rate and blood loss exhibited no significant difference between FURS-MUS and FURS (complication rate, 6.5% vs. 5.9%, respectively; blood loss, 4.2% vs. 4.6%, respectively). FURS-MUS significantly decreased inflammatory cytokines and risk of sepsis, and improved readmission rate, stone recurrence and progression-free survival compared with patients treated with FURS. In conclusion, these data suggested that FURS-MUS may be an efficient, minimally invasive and reproducible operation for patients with upper urinary tract calculi.
软性输尿管镜碎石术(FURS)是上尿路结石(直径<2 cm)患者最常用的治疗方法。这项前瞻性研究的目的是评估FURS联合金属输尿管支架(MUS)治疗上尿路结石的疗效。本研究共纳入38例上尿路结石患者,比较FURS与FURS联合MUS(FURS-MUS)的疗效。结果表明,与FURS相比,FURS-MUS缩短了手术时间(分别为35.2±1.2分钟和57.4±1.7分钟;P<0.01)。数据还表明,FURS-MUS和FURS的结石清除率分别从94.5%和87.8%下降(P<0.05)。与FURS相比,FURS-MUS治疗缩短了术后住院时间(分别为4.5±0.5天和7.5±1.5天;P<0.05)。这些数据表明,与FURS相比,FURS-MUS显著增加了术后炎症评分(分别为6.2±0.8和4.2±1.0;P<0.05)。FURS-MUS和FURS之间的并发症发生率和失血量无显著差异(并发症发生率分别为6.5%和5.9%;失血量分别为4.2%和4.6%)。与接受FURS治疗的患者相比,FURS-MUS显著降低了炎症细胞因子和败血症风险,并提高了再入院率、结石复发率和无进展生存率。总之,这些数据表明,FURS-MUS可能是上尿路结石患者一种有效、微创且可重复的手术方法。