Institute of Psychology, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Institute of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Clin Neuropsychol. 2021 Dec;35(sup1):S1-S20. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2020.1812723. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
A prerequisite of any psychological instrument used to compare individuals from different groups is measurement invariance (MI). It indicates that the test measures the same psychological constructs regardless of the particular grouping variable of the test-taker. Our purpose was to evaluate the MI across sex, age groups and educational levels in the recently adapted Estonian version of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale - Third Edition (WAIS-III).
We analysed the Estonian standardization sample of WAIS-III (N = 770) with confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to establish the best baseline factor model for further analysis. Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis (MG-CFA) was applied to evaluate MI of the test and, granted this, mean differences across sex, age groups and educational levels.
CFA supported the four-factor model. The test demonstrated partial MI across sexes; latent mean comparisons showed that men had a significantly higher mean score on the Perceptual Organization factor. Partial MI also held across age groups and, as expected, older groups had significantly lower means than younger age groups. The analyses across the educational levels failed to prove the MI as the metric invariance was not tenable.
The results of this study provide evidence that the structural model underlying the Estonian adaption of WAIS-III is partially invariant across sex and age groups, hence the test functions same manner across these groups. Estonian WAIS-III was not invariant across the educational levels, which may indicate that the measure has a different structure or meaning to different educational groups.
用于比较不同群体个体的任何心理工具的前提是测量不变性(MI)。它表明,无论测试者的特定分组变量如何,该测试都能测量相同的心理结构。我们的目的是评估最近适应的爱沙尼亚版韦氏成人智力量表第三版(WAIS-III)在性别、年龄组和教育水平上的 MI。
我们用验证性因子分析(CFA)分析了 WAIS-III 的爱沙尼亚标准化样本(N=770),以建立最佳的基线因子模型进行进一步分析。多组验证性因子分析(MG-CFA)用于评估测试的 MI,并在此基础上,对性别、年龄组和教育水平的平均差异进行评估。
CFA 支持四因素模型。该测试在性别上表现出部分 MI;潜在均值比较表明,男性在知觉组织因素上的平均得分明显较高。MI 也在年龄组中存在部分一致性,并且正如预期的那样,年龄较大的组的平均得分明显低于年龄较小的组。跨教育水平的分析未能证明 MI,因为度量不变性不可行。
这项研究的结果提供了证据,表明爱沙尼亚版 WAIS-III 的结构模型在性别和年龄组上是部分不变的,因此该测试在这些组中以相同的方式运作。爱沙尼亚版 WAIS-III 在教育水平上没有不变性,这可能表明该测量对不同的教育群体具有不同的结构或意义。