• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用双识别检测法对 SARS-CoV-2 IgM 和 IgG 抗体进行高临床性能和定量评估。

High clinical performance and quantitative assessment of antibody kinetics using a dual recognition assay for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG antibodies.

机构信息

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Cliniques Universitaires St-Luc and Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Clinique St-Luc Bouge, Namur, Belgium; Department of Pharmacy, Namur Research Institute for LIfes Sciences, University of Namur, Belgium.

出版信息

Clin Biochem. 2020 Dec;86:23-27. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2020.08.009. Epub 2020 Aug 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2020.08.009
PMID:32858061
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7445483/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Several serological SARS-CoV-2 immunoassays have been developed recently but require external validation before widespread use. This study aims at assessing the analytical and clinical performance of the iFlash® anti-SARS-CoV-2 chemiluminescence assay for the detection of both IgM and IgG antibodies. The kinetics of the antibody response was also evaluated.

DESIGN & METHODS: The precision, carry-over, linearity, limit of blank, detection and quantification were assessed. Sensitivity analysis was performed by using 178 sera collected from 154 RT-PCR confirmed COVID-19 patients. The specificity analysis was performed from 75 selected non-SARS-CoV-2 sera with a potential cross-reaction to the SARS-CoV-2 immunoassay.

RESULTS

This iFlash® SARS-CoV-2 assay showed excellent analytical performance. After 2 weeks since symptom onset, the sensitivities for IgM and IgG were 62.2% (95% CI: 52.3-71.2%) and 92.9%% (95% CI: 85.7-96.7%), respectively by using the cut-off provided by the manufacturer. After cut-off optimization (i.e. >2.81 for IgM and >4.86 for IgG), the sensitivity for IgM and IgG were 81.6 (95% CI: 72.7-88.1%) and 95.9% (95% CI: 89.4-98.7%), respectively. Optimized cut-off for IgG improved the sensitivity to reach 100% (95%CI: 87.6-100) from 28 days since symptom onset.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that the iFlash® SARS-CoV-2 assay from YHLO biotechnology, has satisfactory analytical performance. Nevertheless, the sensitivity of the IgM is limited for a proper clinical use compared to IgG. The determination of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies from 28 days since symptom onset was associated with high sensitivity, especially using optimized cut-offs (i.e. 100%).

摘要

目的

最近开发了几种血清学 SARS-CoV-2 免疫测定法,但在广泛使用之前需要进行外部验证。本研究旨在评估 iFlash®抗 SARS-CoV-2 化学发光测定法检测 IgM 和 IgG 抗体的分析和临床性能。还评估了抗体反应的动力学。

设计和方法

评估了精密度、携带污染、线性、空白限、检测限和定量限。使用从 154 例经 RT-PCR 确诊的 COVID-19 患者中收集的 178 份血清进行了敏感性分析。从 75 份选定的非 SARS-CoV-2 血清中进行了特异性分析,这些血清可能与 SARS-CoV-2 免疫测定有交叉反应。

结果

该 iFlash® SARS-CoV-2 测定法显示出优异的分析性能。在症状出现后 2 周,使用制造商提供的临界值,IgM 和 IgG 的灵敏度分别为 62.2%(95%CI:52.3-71.2%)和 92.9%(95%CI:85.7-96.7%)。通过临界值优化(即 IgM >2.81 和 IgG >4.86)后,IgM 和 IgG 的灵敏度分别为 81.6(95%CI:72.7-88.1%)和 95.9%(95%CI:89.4-98.7%)。从症状出现后 28 天开始,优化 IgG 的临界值可将灵敏度提高到 100%(95%CI:87.6-100)。

结论

本研究表明,YHLO 生物技术的 iFlash® SARS-CoV-2 测定法具有令人满意的分析性能。然而,与 IgG 相比,IgM 的灵敏度对于适当的临床应用有限。从症状出现后 28 天开始,确定抗 SARS-CoV-2 IgG 抗体与高灵敏度相关,尤其是使用优化的临界值(即 100%)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49d2/7445483/2ebe7517b67a/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49d2/7445483/2ebe7517b67a/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49d2/7445483/2ebe7517b67a/gr1_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
High clinical performance and quantitative assessment of antibody kinetics using a dual recognition assay for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG antibodies.采用双识别检测法对 SARS-CoV-2 IgM 和 IgG 抗体进行高临床性能和定量评估。
Clin Biochem. 2020 Dec;86:23-27. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2020.08.009. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
2
Analytical and clinical validation of an ELISA for specific SARS-CoV-2 IgG, IgA, and IgM antibodies.用于特异性 SARS-CoV-2 IgG、IgA 和 IgM 抗体的 ELISA 的分析和临床验证。
J Med Virol. 2021 Feb;93(2):803-811. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26303. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
3
Recent Advances in the Evaluation of Serological Assays for the Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 Infection and COVID-19.新型冠状病毒血清学检测方法在 SARS-CoV-2 感染和 COVID-19 诊断中的研究进展。
Front Public Health. 2021 Feb 18;8:620222. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.620222. eCollection 2020.
4
Clinical Performance of SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgM Tests Using an Automated Chemiluminescent Assay.使用自动化化学发光检测法的 SARS-CoV-2 IgG 和 IgM 检测的临床性能。
Curr Med Sci. 2021 Apr;41(2):318-322. doi: 10.1007/s11596-021-2349-7. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
5
Longitudinal characterization of the IgM and IgG humoral response in symptomatic COVID-19 patients using the Abbott Architect.采用雅培Architect 对有症状的 COVID-19 患者的 IgM 和 IgG 体液免疫应答进行纵向特征分析。
J Clin Virol. 2020 Dec;133:104663. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104663. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
6
Comparison of six antibody assays and two combination assays for COVID-19.六种抗体检测试剂盒与两种联合检测试剂盒用于 COVID-19 的比较。
Virol J. 2022 Feb 3;19(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12985-022-01752-y.
7
Seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in Japanese COVID-19 patients.日本新冠肺炎患者中抗新型冠状病毒2抗体的血清流行率。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 6;16(4):e0249449. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249449. eCollection 2021.
8
Performance of the COVID19SEROSpeed IgM/IgG Rapid Test, an Immunochromatographic Assay for the Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 Infection: a Multicenter European Study.新型冠状病毒病(COVID-19)SEROSpeed IgM/IgG 快速检测试剂盒(一种用于诊断 SARS-CoV-2 感染的免疫层析测定法)的性能:一项多中心欧洲研究。
J Clin Microbiol. 2021 Jan 21;59(2). doi: 10.1128/JCM.02240-20.
9
Monitoring Specific IgM and IgG Production Among Severe COVID-19 Patients Using Qualitative and Quantitative Immunodiagnostic Assays: A Retrospective Cohort Study.利用定性和定量免疫诊断检测监测重症 COVID-19 患者的特异性 IgM 和 IgG 产生:一项回顾性队列研究。
Front Immunol. 2021 Sep 3;12:705441. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.705441. eCollection 2021.
10
Validation of a new automated chemiluminescent anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG antibody assay system detecting both N and S proteins in Japan.日本一种新型自动化化学发光抗SARS-CoV-2 IgM和IgG抗体检测系统的验证,该系统可同时检测N蛋白和S蛋白。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 4;16(3):e0247711. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247711. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic Efficacy of 11 SARS-CoV-2 Serological Assays for COVID-19: A Meta-Analysis and Adjusted Indirect Comparison of Diagnostic Test Accuracy.11种新型冠状病毒2型血清学检测方法对冠状病毒病的诊断效能:诊断试验准确性的Meta分析和校正间接比较
Immun Inflamm Dis. 2024 Dec;12(12):e70114. doi: 10.1002/iid3.70114.
2
High SARS-CoV-2 infection rate in children unvaccinated with COVID-19 vaccine in Changzhou, China, shortly after lifting zero-COVID-19 policy in December 2022.2022 年 12 月中国解除“动态清零”政策后不久,在常州未接种 COVID-19 疫苗的儿童中 SARS-CoV-2 感染率很高。
BMC Infect Dis. 2024 Jun 5;24(1):560. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-09445-3.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Response of anti-SARS-CoV-2 total antibodies to nucleocapsid antigen in COVID-19 patients: a longitudinal study.新冠病毒肺炎患者中抗SARS-CoV-2总抗体对核衣壳抗原的反应:一项纵向研究
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020 Sep 25;58(10):e193-e196. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2020-0962.
2
Clinical and immunological assessment of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections.无症状 SARS-CoV-2 感染的临床和免疫学评估。
Nat Med. 2020 Aug;26(8):1200-1204. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0965-6. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
3
Diagnostic performances and thresholds: The key to harmonization in serological SARS-CoV-2 assays?
Antibody tests for identification of current and past infection with SARS-CoV-2.
抗体检测用于鉴定 SARS-CoV-2 的现症感染和既往感染。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 17;11(11):CD013652. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013652.pub2.
4
Evaluation of Three Quantitative Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Immunoassays.三种定量抗 SARS-CoV-2 抗体免疫分析方法的评估。
Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Dec 22;9(3):e0137621. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01376-21.
5
Performance of the Roche/Snibe electrochemiluminescent anti-SARS-COV-2 spike assays compared to the Roche/Abbott IgG nucleocapsid and Abbott IgM spike assays.将罗氏/思塔高电化学发光抗SARS-CoV-2刺突蛋白检测与罗氏/雅培IgG核衣壳检测及雅培IgM刺突蛋白检测的性能进行比较。
Pract Lab Med. 2021 Nov;27:e00257. doi: 10.1016/j.plabm.2021.e00257. Epub 2021 Oct 13.
6
Neutralizing Antibodies in COVID-19 Patients and Vaccine Recipients after Two Doses of BNT162b2.辉瑞-BioNTech 两剂疫苗接种后 COVID-19 患者和疫苗接种者的中和抗体。
Viruses. 2021 Jul 14;13(7):1364. doi: 10.3390/v13071364.
7
Performance of a SARS CoV-2 antibody ELISA based on simultaneous measurement of antibodies against the viral nucleoprotein and receptor-binding domain.基于同时测量针对病毒核蛋白和受体结合域的抗体的 SARS CoV-2 抗体 ELISA 的性能。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021 Dec;40(12):2645-2649. doi: 10.1007/s10096-021-04284-5. Epub 2021 Jun 4.
8
Landscape of humoral immune responses against SARS-CoV-2 in patients with COVID-19 disease and the value of antibody testing.新冠病毒疾病患者针对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2的体液免疫反应格局及抗体检测的价值
Heliyon. 2021 Apr;7(4):e06836. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06836. Epub 2021 Apr 17.
9
Cross-Reactivity of Two SARS-CoV-2 Serological Assays in a Setting Where Malaria Is Endemic.两种严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2血清学检测方法在疟疾流行地区的交叉反应性
J Clin Microbiol. 2021 Jun 18;59(7):e0051421. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00514-21.
10
Multiplex quantitative detection of SARS-CoV-2 specific IgG and IgM antibodies based on DNA-assisted nanopore sensing.基于 DNA 辅助纳米孔传感的 SARS-CoV-2 特异性 IgG 和 IgM 抗体的多重定量检测。
Biosens Bioelectron. 2021 Jun 1;181:113134. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2021.113134. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
诊断性能和阈值:血清学 SARS-CoV-2 检测方法协调的关键?
Clin Chim Acta. 2020 Oct;509:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2020.05.050. Epub 2020 May 30.
4
Clinical Performance of the Elecsys Electrochemiluminescent Immunoassay for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Total Antibodies.用于检测新型冠状病毒2型总抗体的罗氏电化学发光免疫分析法的临床性能
Clin Chem. 2020 Aug 1;66(8):1104-1106. doi: 10.1093/clinchem/hvaa131.
5
Molecular, serological, and biochemical diagnosis and monitoring of COVID-19: IFCC taskforce evaluation of the latest evidence.新型冠状病毒肺炎的分子、血清学和生化诊断与监测:国际临床化学和检验医学联合会专家组对最新证据的评估。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020 Jun 25;58(7):1037-1052. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2020-0722.
6
Validation of a chemiluminescent assay for specific SARS-CoV-2 antibody.用于特定 SARS-CoV-2 抗体的化学发光测定法的验证。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020 Jul 28;58(8):1357-1364. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2020-0594.
7
The role of serology for COVID-19 control: Population, kinetics and test performance do matter.血清学在新冠疫情防控中的作用:人群、动态变化及检测性能至关重要。
J Infect. 2020 Aug;81(2):e91-e92. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.05.019. Epub 2020 May 15.
8
Evaluation of two automated and three rapid lateral flow immunoassays for the detection of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies.评价两种自动化和三种快速侧向流动免疫测定法用于检测抗 SARS-CoV-2 抗体。
J Clin Virol. 2020 Jul;128:104413. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104413. Epub 2020 May 5.
9
COVID-19 and Postinfection Immunity: Limited Evidence, Many Remaining Questions.新冠病毒感染与感染后免疫:证据有限,仍有诸多问题
JAMA. 2020 Jun 9;323(22):2245-2246. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.7869.
10
Antibody tests for COVID-19: drawing attention to the importance of analytical specificity.新型冠状病毒肺炎的抗体检测:关注分析特异性的重要性
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020 Jun 25;58(7):1144-1145. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2020-0554.