Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 10 Medical Drive, Singapore, 117597, Singapore.
Clinical Imaging Research Centre, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Sci Rep. 2020 Aug 28;10(1):14236. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-71127-2.
We compared the somatostatin analog radioligand, DOTANOC, with FDG, to determine whether there was increased detection of active or sub-clinical lesions in pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) with DOTANOC. Three groups were recruited: (1) active pulmonary TB; (2) IGRA-positive household TB contacts; (3) pneumonia (non-TB). DOTANOC PET/MRI followed by FDG PET/MRI was performed in active TB and pneumonia groups. TB contacts underwent FDG PET/MRI, then DOTANOC PET/MRI if abnormalities were detected. Quantitative and qualitative analyses were performed for total lung and individual lesions. Eight active TB participants, three TB contacts and three pneumonia patients had paired PET/MRI scans. In the active TB group, median SUVmax for parenchymal lesions was 7.69 (range 3.00-15.88); median SUVmax was 2.59 (1.48-6.40). Regions of tracer uptake were fairly similar for both radioligands, albeit more diffusely distributed in the FDG scans. In TB contacts, two PET/MRIs had parenchymal lesions detected with FDG (SUVmax 5.50 and 1.82), with corresponding DOTANOC uptake < 1. FDG and DOTANOC uptake was similar in pneumonia patients (SUVmax 4.17-6.18; SUVmax 2.92-4.78). DOTANOC can detect pulmonary TB lesions, but FDG is more sensitive for both active and sub-clinical lesions. FDG remains the preferred ligand for clinical studies, although DOTANOC may provide additional value for pathogenesis studies.
我们比较了生长抑素类似物放射性配体 DOTANOC 和 FDG,以确定 DOTANOC 是否能增加对活动性或亚临床肺结核(TB)病变的检测。招募了三组参与者:(1)活动性肺结核;(2)IGRA 阳性的肺结核家庭接触者;(3)肺炎(非 TB)。在活动性肺结核和肺炎组中进行了 DOTANOC PET/MRI 和 FDG PET/MRI。TB 接触者先进行 FDG PET/MRI,如果发现异常,再进行 DOTANOC PET/MRI。对全肺和单个病变进行了定量和定性分析。8 例活动性肺结核参与者、3 例 TB 接触者和 3 例肺炎患者进行了配对的 PET/MRI 扫描。在活动性肺结核组中,实质病变的 SUVmax 中位数为 7.69(范围 3.00-15.88);SUVmax 中位数为 2.59(1.48-6.40)。两种示踪剂的摄取区域相当相似,尽管 FDG 扫描的分布更为弥散。在 TB 接触者中,有 2 例 PET/MRI 检测到 FDG(SUVmax 5.50 和 1.82)摄取的实质病变,相应的 DOTANOC 摄取值<1。肺炎患者的 FDG 和 DOTANOC 摄取值相似(SUVmax 4.17-6.18;SUVmax 2.92-4.78)。DOTANOC 可检测肺结核病变,但 FDG 对活动性和亚临床病变更为敏感。尽管 DOTANOC 可能为发病机制研究提供额外的价值,但 FDG 仍是临床研究的首选配体。