Suppr超能文献

远程缺血预处理预防对比剂肾病 - 一项随机对照试验。

Remote ischemic preconditioning for prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy - A randomized control trial.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Rajarshee Chhatrapati Shahu Maharaj Government Medical College and CPR Hospital, Kolhapur, India.

Department of Cardiology, King Edward Memorial Hospital and Seth Gordhandas Sunderdas Medical College, Mumbai, India.

出版信息

Indian Heart J. 2020 Jul-Aug;72(4):244-247. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2020.04.010. Epub 2020 May 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of sufficient data regarding the protective effects of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) in patients at risk of developing contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN). Thus, this study was conducted to determine whether RIPC as an adjunct to standard therapy prevents CIN in high-risk patients undergoing coronary intervention.

METHODS

In a single-center, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial, 162 patients who were at risk of CIN received standard hydration combined with RIPC or hydration with sham preconditioning. RIPC was accomplished by four cycles of 5 min ischemia and 5 min reperfusion of the forearm. The primary endpoint was a rise in serum creatinine (>0.5 mg/dL or >25%) from baseline to serum creatinine 48-72 h after contrast administration.

RESULTS

Of the 162 patients, 81 were randomly allocated to receive sham preconditioning and 81 to receive RIPC. Significantly reduced serum creatinine levels were observed in patients with a Mehran moderate risk allocated to sham group compared to the RIPC group (0.070 ± 0.16 mg/dL vs. 0.107 ± 0.13 mg/dL, p = 0.001). With regards to the primary endpoint, a significantly higher change in serum creatinine from baseline to 48-72 h was observed in the sham group compared to the RIPC group (0.023 ± 0.2 μmol/L vs -0.064 ± 0.1 μmol/L, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

RIPC as an alternative to standard therapy, improved serum creatinine levels after contrast administration in patients at risk of CIN. However, present data indicate that RIPC might have beneficial effects in patients with a moderate or high risk of CIN.

摘要

背景

关于远程缺血预处理(RIPC)对发生对比剂肾病(CIN)风险患者的保护作用,目前数据不足。因此,本研究旨在确定 RIPC 作为标准治疗的辅助手段是否可预防高危患者行冠脉介入后发生 CIN。

方法

在一项单中心、双盲、随机对照试验中,162 名有发生 CIN 风险的患者接受标准水化联合 RIPC 或假预处理的水化治疗。RIPC 通过前臂 5 分钟缺血和 5 分钟再灌注的 4 个循环来完成。主要终点是在造影后 48-72 小时血清肌酐基线值升高(>0.5mg/dL 或>25%)。

结果

在 162 名患者中,81 名被随机分配接受假预处理,81 名接受 RIPC。与 RIPC 组相比,Mehran 中度风险分配至假处理组的患者血清肌酐水平显著降低(0.070±0.16mg/dL 比 0.107±0.13mg/dL,p=0.001)。关于主要终点,与 RIPC 组相比,假处理组从基线到 48-72 小时血清肌酐的变化显著更高(0.023±0.2μmol/L 比-0.064±0.1μmol/L,p<0.001)。

结论

RIPC 作为标准治疗的替代方法,可改善 CIN 高危患者造影后血清肌酐水平。然而,目前的数据表明,RIPC 可能对中危或高危 CIN 患者有有益作用。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

5
Current concepts of contrast-induced nephropathy: a brief review.当前对比剂诱导肾病的概念:简要综述。
J Chin Med Assoc. 2013 Dec;76(12):673-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jcma.2013.08.011. Epub 2013 Oct 3.
9
Contrast-induced nephropathy in interventional cardiology.介入心脏病学中的对比剂肾病
Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis. 2011;4:85-99. doi: 10.2147/IJNRD.S21393. Epub 2011 Jul 12.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验