• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双倍食品券:使用情况、影响、障碍和促进因素的定性评估。

Double Up Food Bucks: A Qualitative Evaluation of Usage, Impact, Barriers, and Facilitators.

机构信息

Department of Community Health and Health Behavior, School of Public Health and Health Professions, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.

Department of Sociology, College of Arts and Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.

出版信息

J Nutr Educ Behav. 2020 Dec;52(12):1100-1110. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2020.07.005. Epub 2020 Aug 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.jneb.2020.07.005
PMID:32861585
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate implementation of a farmers market-based fruit and vegetable incentive program.

DESIGN

Four focus groups and 6 interviews with program participants from April through November 2017.

SETTING

Double Up Food Bucks (DUFB) program in Western New York.

PARTICIPANTS

Western New York DUFB program participants.

PHENOMENON OF INTEREST

Customer DUFB usage, how DUFB affects purchasing, and program barriers or facilitators.

ANALYSIS

Two independent researchers coded focus group and interview transcripts. Researchers summarized codes as themes and selected illustrative quotes.

RESULTS

Participants (n = 36) were mostly female (75%); 69.4% reported a household income less than $20,000. They reported taking home and consuming more fruits and vegetables because of DUFB, almost always earning the maximum amount of DUFB and saving DUFB for later use. Barriers to using DUFB included limited hours and locations, running out of tokens, poor access to farmers market, and limited stocking. Participants recommended improved program communication, more venues, and convenient schedules to facilitate program use.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Findings indicated that incentive programs increased fruit and vegetable consumption and purchasing among those who use them, however barriers to using incentives still existed. To improve the participant experience, program administrators should implement technology-based systems, provide robust communication, and offer incentives at varied locations and times.

摘要

目的

评估基于农贸市场的水果和蔬菜激励计划的实施情况。

设计

2017 年 4 月至 11 月,通过 4 个焦点小组和 6 次访谈对项目参与者进行研究。

地点

纽约西部的“双加倍现金”(Double Up Food Bucks,DUFB)项目。

参与者

纽约西部 DUFB 项目参与者。

研究现象

客户 DUFB 使用情况、DUFB 如何影响购买行为,以及项目的障碍或促进因素。

分析方法

两位独立研究人员对焦点小组和访谈记录进行编码。研究人员将代码总结为主题,并选择有代表性的引语。

结果

参与者(n=36)大多为女性(75%);69.4%的人报告家庭收入低于 20000 美元。他们表示,由于 DUFB,他们带回家并消费了更多的水果和蔬菜,几乎总是获得了最多的 DUFB 并将 DUFB 存起来以后使用。使用 DUFB 的障碍包括营业时间和地点有限、代币用完、难以到达农贸市场以及库存有限。参与者建议改善项目沟通、增加更多场地,并提供更方便的时间安排,以促进项目的使用。

结论和意义

研究结果表明,激励计划增加了那些使用激励计划的人的水果和蔬菜消费和购买,但使用激励计划的障碍仍然存在。为了改善参与者的体验,项目管理人员应实施基于技术的系统,提供强有力的沟通,并在不同的地点和时间提供激励。

相似文献

1
Double Up Food Bucks: A Qualitative Evaluation of Usage, Impact, Barriers, and Facilitators.双倍食品券:使用情况、影响、障碍和促进因素的定性评估。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2020 Dec;52(12):1100-1110. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2020.07.005. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
2
A Qualitative Evaluation of Double Up Food Bucks Farmers' Market Incentive Program Access.双币食品券农贸市场激励计划准入情况的定性评估。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2020 Jul;52(7):705-712. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2019.11.010. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
3
Higher Fruit and Vegetable Intake Is Associated with Participation in the Double Up Food Bucks (DUFB) Program.较高的水果和蔬菜摄入量与参与双加食品券(DUFB)计划有关。
Nutrients. 2021 Jul 29;13(8):2607. doi: 10.3390/nu13082607.
4
Increasing Use of a Healthy Food Incentive: A Waiting Room Intervention Among Low-Income Patients.增加健康食品激励措施的使用:一项针对低收入患者的候诊室干预措施。
Am J Prev Med. 2017 Feb;52(2):154-162. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.11.008.
5
Reducing food insecurity and improving fruit and vegetable intake through a nutrition incentive program in Michigan, USA.通过美国密歇根州的一项营养激励计划减少粮食不安全状况并改善水果和蔬菜摄入量。
SSM Popul Health. 2021 Aug 17;15:100898. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100898. eCollection 2021 Sep.
6
Double Up Food Bucks Participation is Associated with Increased Fruit and Vegetable Consumption and Food Security Among Low-Income Adults.双倍食品券参与度与低收入成年人增加水果和蔬菜消费及粮食安全相关。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2019 Mar;51(3):342-347. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2018.08.011. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
7
Facilitators and Barriers to Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Incentive Use: Findings From a Clinic Intervention for Low-Income Patients.补充营养援助计划激励措施的使用的促进因素和障碍:一项针对低收入患者的诊所干预措施的研究结果。
Am J Prev Med. 2019 Apr;56(4):571-579. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.11.010. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
8
Participant Perceptions of the Double Up Food Bucks Program at Oregon Farmers' Markets.消费者对俄勒冈州农贸市场“双币食品券”项目的看法。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2020 Nov;52(11):1043-1051. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2020.02.016. Epub 2020 Apr 5.
9
Manager Perspectives on Implementation of a Farmers' Market Incentive Program in Maryland.马里兰州农贸市场激励计划实施的管理者观点。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2019 Sep;51(8):926-935. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2019.04.001. Epub 2019 May 6.
10
Improving fruit and vegetable consumption among low-income customers at farmers markets: Philly Food Bucks, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 2011.提高农贸市场低收入顾客的水果和蔬菜消费:费城食品券,宾夕法尼亚州费城,2011 年。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2013 Oct 3;10:E166. doi: 10.5888/pcd10.120356.

引用本文的文献

1
Caregiver-reported barriers to engagement in a paediatric fresh fruit and vegetable prescription programme.照顾者报告的参与儿科新鲜水果和蔬菜处方计划的障碍。
J Nutr Sci. 2024 Sep 18;13:e33. doi: 10.1017/jns.2024.33. eCollection 2024.
2
Local Food System Approaches to Address Food and Nutrition Security among Low-Income Populations: A Systematic Review.本地食品系统方法在解决低收入人群的食物和营养安全问题中的应用:系统评价。
Adv Nutr. 2024 Apr;15(4):100156. doi: 10.1016/j.advnut.2023.100156. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
3
The California Nutrition Incentive Program: Participants' Perceptions and Associations with Produce Purchases, Consumption, and Food Security.
加利福尼亚营养激励计划:参与者对购买、消费农产品和食品安全的看法及关联。
Nutrients. 2022 Jun 29;14(13):2699. doi: 10.3390/nu14132699.