Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia.
Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia.
J Environ Manage. 2020 Dec 1;275:111075. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111075. Epub 2020 Aug 30.
We investigate a new framework for estimating the frequency and severity of losses associated with catastrophic risks such as bushfires, storms and floods. We explore generalized additive models for location, scale and shape (GAMLSS) for the quantification of regional risk factors - geographical, weather and climate variables - with the aim of better quantifying the frequency and severity of catastrophic losses from natural perils. Due to the flexibility of the GAMLSS approach, we find a superior fit to empirical loss data for the applied models in comparison to generalized linear regression models typically applied in the literature. In particular the generalized beta distribution of the second kind (GB2) provides a good fit to the severity of losses. Including covariates in the calibration of the scale parameter, we obtain vastly differently shaped distributions for the predicted individual losses at different levels of the covariates. Testing the GAMLSS approach in an out-of-sample validation exercise, we also find support for a correct specification of the estimated models. More accurate models for the losses from natural hazards will help state and local government policy development, in particular for risk management and scenario planning for emergency services with respect to these perils.
我们研究了一种新的框架,用于估算与丛林大火、风暴和洪水等灾难性风险相关的频率和严重程度。我们探索了用于位置、规模和形状的广义加性模型(GAMLSS),以量化区域风险因素 - 地理、天气和气候变量 - 旨在更好地量化自然灾害造成的灾难性损失的频率和严重程度。由于 GAMLSS 方法的灵活性,我们发现与文献中通常应用的广义线性回归模型相比,应用模型对经验损失数据的拟合更好。特别是第二类广义 beta 分布(GB2)对损失的严重程度提供了很好的拟合。在对尺度参数进行校准时包含协变量,我们在协变量的不同水平上获得了对预测的个体损失的差异很大的分布。通过在样本外验证中测试 GAMLSS 方法,我们还发现对估计模型的正确规范的支持。更准确的自然灾害损失模型将有助于州和地方政府的政策制定,特别是对于这些风险的应急服务的风险管理和情景规划。