• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经导管主动脉瓣置换术后起搏器植入的发生率和结局的时间趋势:美国(2012-2017 年)

Temporal Trends in the Incidence and Outcomes of Pacemaker Implantation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in the United States (2012-2017).

机构信息

Division of Cardiology Department of Medicine West Virginia University Morgantown WV.

Division of Cardiology Department of Medicine University of Kentucky Lexington KY.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Sep 15;9(18):e016685. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.016685. Epub 2020 Aug 31.

DOI:10.1161/JAHA.120.016685
PMID:32862774
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7726966/
Abstract

Background Nationwide studies documenting temporal trends in permanent pacemaker implantation (PPMI) following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are limited. Methods and Results We selected patients who underwent TAVR between 2012 and 2017 in the National Readmission Database. The primary end point was the 6-year trend in post-TAVR PPMI at index hospitalization and at 30, 90, and 180 days after discharge. The secondary end point was the association between PPMI and in-hospital mortality, stroke, cost, length of stay, and disposition. Among the 89 202 patients who underwent TAVR, 77 405 (86.8%) with no prior pacemaker or defibrillator were included. Patients who required PPMI had a higher prevalence of atrial fibrillation (43.6% versus 38.7%, <0.001) and conduction abnormalities (28.4% versus 15.3%, <0.001). The incidence of PPMI during index admission increased from 8.7% in 2012 to 13.2% in 2015, and then decreased to 9.6% in 2017. The incidence of inpatient PPMI within 30 days after discharge increased from 0.5% in 2012 to 1.25% in 2017 (<0.001). Inpatient PPMI beyond 30 days remained rare (<0.5%) during the study period. After risk adjustment, PPMI was not associated with in-hospital mortality or stroke but was associated with increased nonhome discharge, longer hospitalization, and higher cost. The incremental expenditure associated with post-TAVR PPMI during index admission increased from $9.6 million to $72.2 million between 2012 and 2017. Conclusions After an upward trend, rates of PPMI after TAVR in the United States stabilized at ~10% in 2016 to 2017, but there was a notable increase in PPMI within 30 days after the index admission. PPMI was not associated with increased in-hospital morbidity or mortality but led to longer hospitalization, higher cost, and more nonhome discharges.

摘要

背景

目前,有关经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后永久性心脏起搏器植入(PPMI)时间趋势的全国性研究较为有限。

方法和结果

我们在国家再入院数据库中选择了 2012 年至 2017 年间接受 TAVR 的患者。主要终点是指数住院期间和出院后 30、90 和 180 天的 TAVR 后 PPMI 的 6 年趋势。次要终点是 PPMI 与院内死亡率、卒中和成本、住院时间和处置之间的相关性。在接受 TAVR 的 89202 例患者中,有 77405 例(86.8%)无先前的起搏器或除颤器,需要 PPMI 的患者心房颤动(43.6%对 38.7%,<0.001)和传导异常(28.4%对 15.3%,<0.001)的发生率更高。指数住院期间 PPMI 的发生率从 2012 年的 8.7%增加到 2015 年的 13.2%,然后在 2017 年下降到 9.6%。出院后 30 天内住院 PPMI 的发生率从 2012 年的 0.5%增加到 2017 年的 1.25%(<0.001)。在研究期间,超过 30 天的住院 PPMI 仍然很少见(<0.5%)。风险调整后,PPMI 与院内死亡率或卒中无关,但与非家庭出院、住院时间延长和成本增加有关。指数住院期间 TAVR 后 PPMI 的增量支出从 2012 年的 960 万美元增加到 2017 年的 7220 万美元。

结论

在经历了上升趋势后,美国 TAVR 后 PPMI 的发生率在 2016 年至 2017 年稳定在 10%左右,但指数入院后 30 天内 PPMI 显著增加。PPMI 与住院期间发病率或死亡率的增加无关,但会导致住院时间延长、成本增加和更多非家庭出院。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c64/7726966/ad4ceb9c5a8f/JAH3-9-e016685-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c64/7726966/6318577ce879/JAH3-9-e016685-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c64/7726966/a3884c8fb1b6/JAH3-9-e016685-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c64/7726966/92c5cc42cdb5/JAH3-9-e016685-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c64/7726966/3e65f8736ea7/JAH3-9-e016685-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c64/7726966/6594a27def41/JAH3-9-e016685-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c64/7726966/ad4ceb9c5a8f/JAH3-9-e016685-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c64/7726966/6318577ce879/JAH3-9-e016685-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c64/7726966/a3884c8fb1b6/JAH3-9-e016685-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c64/7726966/92c5cc42cdb5/JAH3-9-e016685-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c64/7726966/3e65f8736ea7/JAH3-9-e016685-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c64/7726966/6594a27def41/JAH3-9-e016685-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c64/7726966/ad4ceb9c5a8f/JAH3-9-e016685-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Temporal Trends in the Incidence and Outcomes of Pacemaker Implantation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in the United States (2012-2017).经导管主动脉瓣置换术后起搏器植入的发生率和结局的时间趋势:美国(2012-2017 年)
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Sep 15;9(18):e016685. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.016685. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
2
Predictors of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With the SAPIEN 3.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后植入永久起搏器的预测因素:SAPIEN 3 研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Nov 14;9(21):2200-2209. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.08.034.
3
Incidence and Predictors of Pacemaker Implantation in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者起搏器植入的发生率及预测因素
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2015 Jul;38(7):878-86. doi: 10.1111/pace.12653. Epub 2015 May 28.
4
Minimizing Permanent Pacemaker Following Repositionable Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.最大限度减少可重定位自膨式经导管主动脉瓣置换术后永久性起搏器的使用。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Sep 23;12(18):1796-1807. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.05.056. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
5
Predictors for the risk of permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后永久起搏器植入风险的预测因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Card Surg. 2022 Feb;37(2):377-405. doi: 10.1111/jocs.16129. Epub 2021 Nov 14.
6
Temporal Trends and Outcomes of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Bicuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗二叶式主动脉瓣狭窄的时间趋势和结局。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Sep 23;12(18):1811-1822. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.06.037.
7
Incidence, Predictors, and Outcomes of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Analysis From the U.S. Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology TVT Registry.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后永久起搏器植入的发生率、预测因素和结局:来自美国胸外科医师学会/美国心脏病学会 TVT 注册中心的分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Nov 14;9(21):2189-2199. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.07.026.
8
Early versus late discharge after transcatheter aortic valve replacement and readmissions for permanent pacemaker implantation.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后早期与晚期出院与永久性起搏器植入再入院的比较。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Aug;100(2):245-253. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30299. Epub 2022 Jun 27.
9
A Highly Predictive Risk Model for Pacemaker Implantation After TAVR.经 TAVR 治疗后植入起搏器的高预测风险模型。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Oct;10(10 Pt A):1139-1147. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.11.020. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
10
Periprocedural Myocardial Injury Predicts Short- and Long-Term Mortality in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者围手术期心肌损伤可预测短期和长期死亡率。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Nov;11(11):e007106. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007106.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and Validation of a Machine Learning Score for Readmissions After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后再入院的机器学习评分的开发与验证
JACC Adv. 2022 Aug 26;1(3):100060. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2022.100060. eCollection 2022 Aug.
2
Risk of permanent pacemaker implantation following transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Which factors are most relevant?经导管主动脉瓣置换术后永久性起搏器植入的风险:哪些因素最为相关?
World J Cardiol. 2024 Feb 26;16(2):49-53. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v16.i2.49.
3
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation using coplanar and cuspal overlap techniques in Indian patients.

本文引用的文献

1
Utility of 30-Day Continuous Ambulatory Monitoring to Identify Patients With Delayed Occurrence of Atrioventricular Block After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后 30 天连续动态监测对诊断房室传导阻滞迟发的作用。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Dec;12(12):e007635. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007635. Epub 2019 Dec 13.
2
Outcomes of transfemoral balloon expandable transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Comparison of two subsequent valve generations.经股动脉球囊扩张式经导管主动脉瓣植入术的结果:两代瓣膜的比较。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Oct 1;96(4):930-939. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28621. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
3
印度患者中使用共面和瓣叶重叠技术的经导管主动脉瓣植入术。
Indian Heart J. 2024 Jan-Feb;76(1):36-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2024.01.007. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
4
Conduction Disturbance, Pacemaker Rates, and Hospital Length of Stay Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation with the Sapien 3 Valve.经导管主动脉瓣植入术(使用Sapien 3瓣膜)后的传导障碍、起搏器频率及住院时间
Struct Heart. 2022 Mar 30;6(3):100019. doi: 10.1016/j.shj.2022.100019. eCollection 2022 Jul.
5
Invasive electrophysiological testing to predict and guide permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: A meta-analysis.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后预测和指导永久起搏器植入的有创电生理检查:一项荟萃分析。
Heart Rhythm O2. 2022 Oct 22;4(1):24-33. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2022.10.007. eCollection 2023 Jan.
6
Cardiac Computed Tomography: Application in Valvular Heart Disease.心脏计算机断层扫描:在瓣膜性心脏病中的应用
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Mar 24;9:849540. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.849540. eCollection 2022.
7
Incidence and Predictors of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Procedures: Data of The Netherlands Heart Registration (NHR).经导管主动脉瓣手术后永久性起搏器植入的发生率及预测因素:荷兰心脏注册研究(NHR)数据
J Clin Med. 2022 Jan 23;11(3):560. doi: 10.3390/jcm11030560.
8
The Predictors of Conduction Disturbances Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Bicuspid Aortic Valve: A Multicenter Study.二叶式主动脉瓣患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术后传导障碍的预测因素:一项多中心研究
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Nov 29;8:757190. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.757190. eCollection 2021.
9
Impact of Cusp-Overlap View for TAVR with Self-Expandable Valves on 30-Day Conduction Disturbances.经皮主动脉瓣置换术中应用自膨式瓣膜的嵴上嵴下重叠切面与 30 天传导障碍的关系。
J Interv Cardiol. 2021 Apr 28;2021:9991528. doi: 10.1155/2021/9991528. eCollection 2021.
Incidence and Risk Factors for Permanent Pacemaker Implantation Following Mitral or Aortic Valve Surgery.
二尖瓣或主动脉瓣手术后永久性心脏起搏器植入的发生率和危险因素。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Nov 26;74(21):2607-2620. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.08.1064.
4
Development of a Risk Score to Predict New Pacemaker Implantation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后预测新起搏器植入风险评分的开发。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Nov 11;12(21):2133-2142. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.07.015.
5
Pacemaker Implantation and Dependency After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in the REPRISE III Trial.在 REPRISE III 试验中经导管主动脉瓣置换术后起搏器植入和依赖情况。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Nov 5;8(21):e012594. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.012594. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
6
Transcatheter Valve SELECTion in Patients With Right Bundle Branch Block and Impact on Pacemaker Implantations.右束支传导阻滞患者经导管瓣膜选择术及对起搏器植入的影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Sep 23;12(18):1781-1793. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.05.055.
7
Meta-analysis of Temporal and Surgical Risk Dependent Associations With Outcomes After Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Implantation.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术术后结局的时间和手术风险相关的荟萃分析。
Am J Cardiol. 2019 Nov 15;124(10):1608-1614. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.07.066. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
8
Minimizing Permanent Pacemaker Following Repositionable Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.最大限度减少可重定位自膨式经导管主动脉瓣置换术后永久性起搏器的使用。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Sep 23;12(18):1796-1807. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.05.056. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
9
Meta-Analysis Comparing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation With Balloon Versus Self-Expandable Valves.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与球囊扩张式瓣膜和自扩张式瓣膜的荟萃分析比较。
Am J Cardiol. 2019 Oct 15;124(8):1252-1256. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.07.028. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
10
Contemporary trends in the management of aortic stenosis in the USA.美国主动脉瓣狭窄管理的当代趋势
Eur Heart J. 2020 Feb 21;41(8):921-928. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz568.