• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮主动脉瓣置换术中应用自膨式瓣膜的嵴上嵴下重叠切面与 30 天传导障碍的关系。

Impact of Cusp-Overlap View for TAVR with Self-Expandable Valves on 30-Day Conduction Disturbances.

机构信息

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery Institute (ICyCC), Favaloro Foundation University Hospital, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

MC Medicor, International Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Izola, Slovenia.

出版信息

J Interv Cardiol. 2021 Apr 28;2021:9991528. doi: 10.1155/2021/9991528. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1155/2021/9991528
PMID:34007249
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8099519/
Abstract

METHODS AND RESULTS

We retrospectively compared 257 consecutive patients undergoing TAVR with self-expandable valves using either CON ( = 101) or COVL ( = 156) in four intermediate/low volume centers. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the groups. The 30-day incidence of new-onset LBBB (12.9% vs. 5.8%; =0.05) and PPMI rate (17.8% vs. 6.4%; =0.004) was significantly lower when using the COVL implantation view. There was no difference between the CON and COVL groups in 30-day incidence of death (4.9% vs. 2.6%), any stroke (0% vs. 0.6%), and the need for surgical aortic valve replacement (0% for both groups).

CONCLUSION

Using the COVL view for implantation, we achieved a significant reduction of the LBBB and PPMI rate after TAVR in comparison with the traditional CON view, without compromising the TAVR outcomes when using self-expandable prostheses.

摘要

方法与结果

我们回顾性比较了在四个中等/低容量中心使用自膨式瓣膜行经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)的 257 例连续患者,其中 CON 组(n=101)和 COVL 组(n=156)。两组患者的基线特征无显著差异。COVL 入路组新发左束支传导阻滞(LBBB)(12.9%比 5.8%;=0.05)和起搏器植入率(PPMI)(17.8%比 6.4%;=0.004)明显低于 CON 组。CON 组和 COVL 组 30 天死亡率(4.9%比 2.6%)、任何卒中发生率(0%比 0.6%)以及外科主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)需求率(两组均为 0%)均无差异。

结论

与传统 CON 入路相比,COVL 入路可显著降低 TAVR 后新发 LBBB 和 PPMI 发生率,同时使用自膨式瓣膜并不影响 TAVR 结局。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb7a/8099519/bf5b97b9b716/JITC2021-9991528.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb7a/8099519/db414b3ba996/JITC2021-9991528.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb7a/8099519/0aa95db3eac1/JITC2021-9991528.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb7a/8099519/bf5b97b9b716/JITC2021-9991528.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb7a/8099519/db414b3ba996/JITC2021-9991528.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb7a/8099519/0aa95db3eac1/JITC2021-9991528.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb7a/8099519/bf5b97b9b716/JITC2021-9991528.003.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of Cusp-Overlap View for TAVR with Self-Expandable Valves on 30-Day Conduction Disturbances.经皮主动脉瓣置换术中应用自膨式瓣膜的嵴上嵴下重叠切面与 30 天传导障碍的关系。
J Interv Cardiol. 2021 Apr 28;2021:9991528. doi: 10.1155/2021/9991528. eCollection 2021.
2
Predictors of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With the SAPIEN 3.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后植入永久起搏器的预测因素:SAPIEN 3 研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Nov 14;9(21):2200-2209. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.08.034.
3
A single-centre cohort and short-term follow-up of patients who developed persistent new onset left bundle branch block after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后持续性新发左束支传导阻滞患者的单中心队列和短期随访。
Acta Cardiol. 2020 Aug;75(4):360-365. doi: 10.1080/00015385.2020.1713520. Epub 2020 Jan 26.
4
A Highly Predictive Risk Model for Pacemaker Implantation After TAVR.经 TAVR 治疗后植入起搏器的高预测风险模型。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Oct;10(10 Pt A):1139-1147. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.11.020. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
5
Cusp overlap method for self-expanding transcatheter aortic valve replacement.嵴重叠法在自膨式经导管主动脉瓣置换术中的应用。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Jan;103(1):202-208. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30910. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
6
Long-term clinical outcome of persistent left bundle branch block after transfemoral aortic valve implantation.经股动脉主动脉瓣植入术后持续性左束支传导阻滞的长期临床转归。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Feb 15;93(3):538-544. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27850. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
7
Implications of Transcatheter Heart Valve Selection on Early and Late Pacemaker Rate and on Length of Stay.经导管心脏瓣膜选择对早期和晚期起搏器植入率及住院时间的影响。
Can J Cardiol. 2018 Sep;34(9):1165-1173. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2018.06.012.
8
Association between implantation depth assessed by computed tomography and new-onset conduction disturbances after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.经计算机断层扫描评估的植入深度与经导管主动脉瓣植入术后新发传导障碍的关系。
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2017 Sep-Oct;11(5):332-337. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2017.08.003. Epub 2017 Aug 18.
9
Clinical implications of new-onset left bundle branch block after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: analysis of the PARTNER experience.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后新发左束支传导阻滞的临床意义:PARTNER 经验分析。
Eur Heart J. 2014 Jun 21;35(24):1599-607. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht376. Epub 2013 Oct 30.
10
CoreValve Prosthesis Depth: What is the Optimal Measurement Target?CoreValve人工瓣膜深度:最佳测量目标是什么?
J Heart Valve Dis. 2016 Jul;25(4):417-423.

引用本文的文献

1
Cusp-overlap view versus three cusp coplanar view during transcatheter aortic valve replacement using self-expandable valves: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression.使用自膨胀瓣膜进行经导管主动脉瓣置换术时的瓣叶重叠视图与三尖瓣共面视图:一项系统评价、荟萃分析和荟萃回归
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025 Aug 21;25(1):619. doi: 10.1186/s12872-025-05009-8.
2
[The role of implant projection in optimizing transcatheter aortic valve implantation].[植入物投影在优化经导管主动脉瓣植入术中的作用]
REC Interv Cardiol. 2024 Oct 17;6(4):332-339. doi: 10.24875/RECIC.M24000476. eCollection 2024 Oct-Dec.
3
Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic stenosis with a small aortic annulus: A meta-analysis with reconstructed time to event data.

本文引用的文献

1
Temporal Trends in the Incidence and Outcomes of Pacemaker Implantation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in the United States (2012-2017).经导管主动脉瓣置换术后起搏器植入的发生率和结局的时间趋势:美国(2012-2017 年)
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Sep 15;9(18):e016685. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.016685. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
2
Clinical impact of conduction disturbances in transcatheter aortic valve replacement recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者传导障碍的临床影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J. 2020 Aug 1;41(29):2771-2781. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz924.
3
Impact of Complications During Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: How Can They Be Avoided and Managed?
主动脉瓣环较小的主动脉瓣狭窄患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的比较:一项采用事件发生时间数据重建的荟萃分析
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2024 Dec 31;56:101578. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2024.101578. eCollection 2025 Feb.
4
Lifetime management considerations to optimise transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a practical guide.优化经导管主动脉瓣植入术的终生管理考量:实用指南。
EuroIntervention. 2024 Dec 16;20(24):e1493-e1504. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00332.
5
Early outcomes of the novel Myval THV series compared to SAPIEN THV series and Evolut THV series in individuals with severe aortic stenosis.新型Myval经导管心脏瓣膜系列与SAPIEN经导管心脏瓣膜系列和Evolut经导管心脏瓣膜系列在严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者中的早期疗效比较。
EuroIntervention. 2025 Jan 20;21(2):e105-e118. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00951.
6
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in the first 500 patients: a single-center retrospective study.经导管主动脉瓣植入术在 500 例患者中的应用:单中心回顾性研究。
Croat Med J. 2024 Oct 31;65(5):424-430. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2024.65.424.
7
Impact of Implantation Depth on Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis.植入深度对经导管主动脉瓣置换术结果的影响:一项荟萃分析。
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2022 Sep 7;1(6):100450. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2022.100450. eCollection 2022 Nov-Dec.
8
A Comparative Study of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Views for Two Different Self-Expanding Aortic Valves.两种不同自膨胀式主动脉瓣经导管主动脉瓣植入术视图的比较研究
Struct Heart. 2024 Feb 19;8(3):100281. doi: 10.1016/j.shj.2024.100281. eCollection 2024 May.
9
Factors Influencing Implantation Depth During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术中影响植入深度的因素
Interv Cardiol. 2024 Feb 9;19:e01. doi: 10.15420/icr.2023.05. eCollection 2024.
10
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Current Status and Future Indications.经导管主动脉瓣置换术:现状与未来适应症
J Clin Med. 2024 Jan 10;13(2):373. doi: 10.3390/jcm13020373.
经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣置换术中并发症的影响:如何避免和处理这些并发症?
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Sep 17;8(18):e013801. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.013801. Epub 2019 Sep 14.
4
Minimizing Permanent Pacemaker Following Repositionable Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.最大限度减少可重定位自膨式经导管主动脉瓣置换术后永久性起搏器的使用。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Sep 23;12(18):1796-1807. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.05.056. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
5
Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement with a Self-Expanding Valve in Low-Risk Patients.经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗低危患者的自膨式瓣膜。
N Engl J Med. 2019 May 2;380(18):1706-1715. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1816885. Epub 2019 Mar 16.
6
Mortality and Heart Failure Hospitalization in Patients With Conduction Abnormalities After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后传导异常患者的死亡率和心力衰竭住院率。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Jan 14;12(1):52-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.10.053.
7
"Cusp-Overlap" View Simplifies Fluoroscopy-Guided Implantation of Self-Expanding Valve in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.“瓣叶重叠”视图简化了经导管主动脉瓣置换术中透视引导下自膨胀瓣膜的植入。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Aug 27;11(16):1663-1665. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.03.018.
8
Conduction Disturbances After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Current Status and Future Perspectives.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后传导障碍:现状与未来展望。
Circulation. 2017 Sep 12;136(11):1049-1069. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.028352.
9
Temporal Trends in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in France: FRANCE 2 to FRANCE TAVI.法国经导管主动脉瓣置换术的时间趋势:FRANCE 2 至 FRANCE TAVI。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Jul 4;70(1):42-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.04.053.
10
2016 Annual Report of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry.2016 年胸外科医师学会/美国心脏病学会经导管瓣膜治疗注册中心年度报告。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Mar 14;69(10):1215-1230. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.11.033. Epub 2016 Dec 9.