Michaud Laurent, Bourquin Céline, Froté Yves, Stiefel Friedrich, Saillant Stéphane
Service de psychiatrie de liaison, département de psychiatrie, CHUV, Les Allières, avenue de Beaumont 23, 1011 Lausanne, Suisse.
Département de psychiatrie générale et liaison, centre neuchâtelois de psychiatrie, Maladière 45, 2000 Neuchâtel, Suisse.
Ann Med Psychol (Paris). 2021 Feb;179(2):128-130. doi: 10.1016/j.amp.2020.08.014. Epub 2020 Aug 22.
In Switzerland and elsewhere, many psychological support hotlines were set up during the acute phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. Specialists in psychological first aid, in charge of developing and managing these hotlines, had to face an unknown situation, very different from the disasters for which they prepare themselves. Since the pandemic and the associated physical distancing were a potential threat to social cohesion, one could make the hypothesis that, by setting up hotlines, these professionals sought to reintroduce a form of proximity and to care for and cultivate the social connections among people. The pressure, feelings of emergency, anxious anticipation and expectation of the political authorities and the population may have favoured the development of these structures. Other factors certainly also played a role, such as the need to be useful and to exist as professional, or the need to act in order to reduce anxiety related to the pandemic. Altogether, these hotlines were little used, and their usefulness may be questioned. Similar phenomena have been observed - especially in the sanitary domain - with a multiplication of new offers, not always adjusted to specific identified needs, while health care services were on the same time under-used. Our observations plead against emergency responses in crisis situations and for reflecting on the measures to be put in place rather than to "act" them.
在瑞士及其他地方,许多心理支持热线在新冠疫情急性期设立。负责开发和管理这些热线的心理急救专家,不得不面对一种未知的情况,这与他们所准备应对的灾难截然不同。由于疫情以及相关的社交距离措施对社会凝聚力构成潜在威胁,人们可以做出这样的假设:通过设立热线,这些专业人员试图重新引入一种亲近感,并关心和培育人与人之间的社会联系。来自政治当局和民众的压力、紧迫感、焦虑的预期和期望,可能推动了这些机构的发展。其他因素肯定也发挥了作用,比如想要有所作为并以专业人员的身份存在的需求,或者为了减轻与疫情相关的焦虑而采取行动的需求。总体而言,这些热线很少被使用,其效用可能受到质疑。类似的现象已经被观察到——尤其是在卫生领域——新的服务大量增加,但并不总是根据特定的明确需求进行调整,而与此同时,医疗服务却未得到充分利用。我们的观察结果反对在危机情况下采取应急措施,主张思考应采取的措施而非“实施”它们。