Glatz Terese, Lippold Melissa, Jensen Todd M, Fosco Gregory M, Feinberg Mark E
School of Law, Psychology and Social Work, Örebro University, Fakultetsgatan 1, SE - 701 82 Örebro, Sweden.
School of Social Work, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
J Early Adolesc. 2020 Jan 1;40(1):56-82. doi: 10.1177/0272431618824718. Epub 2019 Jan 23.
In line with family systems theory, we examined patterns of hostile interactions within families and their associations with externalizing problems among early-adolescent children. Using hostility scores based on observational data of six dyadic interactions during a triadic interaction ( = 462) (i.e., child-to-mother, mother-to-child, child-to-father, father-to-child, mother-to-father, father-to-mother)-Latent Profile Analysis supported three distinct profiles of hostility. The profile included families with the lowest levels of hostility across dyads; families in the profile scored higher on parent-child hostility, but lower on interparental hostility; the profile showed higher levels of parent-to-child and interparental hostility, but lower child-to-parent hostility. Concerning links to youth outcomes, youth in the profile reported the highest level of externalizing problems, both concurrently and longitudinally. These results point to the importance of examining larger family patterns of hostility to fully understand the association between family hostility and youth adjustment.
根据家庭系统理论,我们研究了家庭内部的敌对互动模式及其与青少年早期儿童外化问题的关联。利用基于三人互动期间六次二元互动观察数据得出的敌意得分(= 462)(即孩子对母亲、母亲对孩子、孩子对父亲、父亲对孩子、母亲对父亲、父亲对母亲)——潜在剖面分析支持了三种不同的敌意剖面。低敌意剖面包括在二元组中敌意水平最低的家庭;中敌意剖面的家庭在亲子敌意方面得分较高,但在父母间敌意方面得分较低;高敌意剖面显示出较高水平的父母对孩子和父母间敌意,但孩子对父母的敌意较低。关于与青少年结果的联系,高敌意剖面的青少年在同时期和纵向都报告了最高水平的外化问题。这些结果表明,研究更大范围的家庭敌意模式对于全面理解家庭敌意与青少年适应之间的关联非常重要。