Baca George
Graduate School of International Studies, Dong-A University, Busan, South Korea.
Dialect Anthropol. 2020;44(3):301-307. doi: 10.1007/s10624-020-09609-y. Epub 2020 Aug 24.
With COVID-19, powerful political and economic forces have magnified their power and expanded inequality. Many critical scholars have celebrated how South Korean authorities have contained the virus in ways that ignore power relations. The government coordinated its pandemic response by expanding its formidable surveillance technologies for tracing, tracking, and mining every activity of ordinary citizens. State managers produced powerful images of the government, in Confucian fashion, protecting the public from a dangerous threat. I will connect these performances of power with an examination of how authorities harnessed its pandemic response to private capital. South Korea's reaction to COVID-19 does represent a positive alternative to the dominant form of oligarchic rule that prevails in Euro-American societies. The governing elite deployed state power in ways that used this conjuncture to continue previous patterns of domination that have continuously expanded surveillance, extending techniques for the extraction of vital data for commercial and political purposes. Rather than celebrate the South Korean authorities, we should analyze how COVID-19 response has deepened South Korean society's social contradictions.
在新冠疫情期间,强大的政治和经济力量放大了它们的影响力,加剧了不平等。许多批判学者赞赏韩国当局控制病毒的方式,却忽略了其中的权力关系。政府通过扩大其强大的监控技术来追踪、跟踪和挖掘普通公民的每一项活动,从而协调其疫情应对措施。政府管理者以儒家方式塑造了政府强有力的形象,宣称保护公众免受危险威胁。我将把这些权力表现与对当局如何利用疫情应对措施为私人资本服务的考察联系起来。韩国对新冠疫情的反应确实代表了一种不同于欧美社会盛行的寡头统治主导形式的积极选择。执政精英以利用这一契机延续先前统治模式的方式行使国家权力,这些模式不断扩大监控范围,扩展用于商业和政治目的的重要数据提取技术。我们不应赞赏韩国当局,而应分析新冠疫情应对措施如何加深了韩国社会的社会矛盾。