Rothblum Esther D, Balsam Kimberly F, Riggle Ellen D B, Rostosky Sharon S, Wickham Robert E
San Diego State University and the Williams Institute, UCLA School of Law.
Palo Alto University.
J GLBT Fam Stud. 2020;16(3):259-276. doi: 10.1080/1550428x.2019.1626787. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
We review methodological opportunities and lessons learned in conducting a longitudinal, prospective study of same-sex couples with civil unions, recruited from a population-based sample, who were compared with same-sex couples in their friendship circle who did not have civil unions, and heterosexual married siblings and their spouse. At Time 1 (2002), Vermont was the only U.S. state to provide legal recognition similar to marriage to same-sex couples; couples came from other U.S. states and other countries to obtain a civil union. At Time 2 (2005), only one U.S. state had legalized same-sex marriage, and at Time 3 (2013) about half of U.S. states had legalized same-sex marriage, some within weeks of the onset of the Time 3 study. Opportunities included sampling legalized same-sex relationships from a population; the use of heterosexual married couples and same-sex couples not in legalized relationships as comparison samples from within the same social network; comparisons between sexual minority and heterosexual women and men with and without children; improvements in statistical methods for non-independence of data and missing data; and the use of mixed methodologies. Lessons learned included obtaining funding, locating participants over time as technologies changed, and on-going shifts in marriage laws during the study.
我们回顾了在开展一项纵向前瞻性研究过程中的方法学机遇和经验教训。该研究的对象是从基于人群的样本中招募的、已缔结民事结合的同性伴侣,将他们与社交圈中未缔结民事结合的同性伴侣、异性已婚兄弟姐妹及其配偶进行比较。在时间点1(2002年),佛蒙特州是美国唯一一个为同性伴侣提供类似婚姻的法律认可的州;情侣们从美国其他州和其他国家赶来缔结民事结合。在时间点2(2005年),只有一个美国州将同性婚姻合法化,在时间点3(2013年),大约一半的美国州将同性婚姻合法化,其中一些是在时间点3研究开始后的几周内。机遇包括从人群中抽样合法化的同性关系;使用异性已婚夫妇和未处于合法化关系的同性伴侣作为来自同一社交网络的对照样本;对有孩子和没有孩子的性少数群体与异性恋男性和女性进行比较;改进针对数据非独立性和缺失数据的统计方法;以及使用混合方法。经验教训包括获得资金、随着技术变化长期定位参与者,以及研究期间婚姻法的持续变化。