Suppr超能文献

2019 年 ACS 和 CPS 中同性伴侣的同居和婚姻:研究注释。

Cohabitation and Marriage Among Same-Sex Couples in the 2019 ACS and CPS: A Research Note.

机构信息

Department of Sociology and Center for Family and Demographic Research, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH, USA.

Department of Sociology and National Center for Family and Marriage Research, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH, USA.

出版信息

Demography. 2022 Oct 1;59(5):1595-1605. doi: 10.1215/00703370-10181474.

Abstract

Since the 2015 U.S. Supreme Court ruling that marriages of same-sex couples are legal in all states in the union, federal surveys have adapted to the shifting legal climate and included new measures that more directly identify same-sex and different-sex cohabiting and married couples. In this research note comparing the largest and most recent federal surveys-the 2019 American Community Survey and Current Population Survey-we find consistent levels of cohabitation and marriage across surveys. While the vast majority (90%) of different-sex couples were married, we report a more even split in cohabitation and marriage among same-sex couples. Our evaluation of sociodemographic characteristics of married and cohabiting couples indicates that differences were less prominent among same-sex couples than among different-sex couples, suggesting weaker sociodemographic selection into marriage among the former. However, factors affecting same-sex and different-sex couples' decisions to live together and marry may differ because of legal and social climates that still present unique obstacles for same-sex couples. Researchers need to acknowledge these differences in assessments of the implications of marriage for health and well-being.

摘要

自 2015 年美国最高法院裁定同性伴侣在全美各州的婚姻均合法以来,联邦调查已适应不断变化的法律环境,并纳入了新的措施,更直接地识别出同性和异性同居及已婚伴侣。在这项比较最大和最新的联邦调查——2019 年美国社区调查和当前人口调查的研究报告中,我们发现调查结果在同居和婚姻方面具有一致性。虽然绝大多数(90%)的异性伴侣已婚,但我们报告称同性伴侣的同居和婚姻比例更为平均。我们对已婚和同居伴侣的社会人口特征进行评估后发现,同性伴侣之间的差异不如异性伴侣之间那么明显,这表明前者的婚姻在社会人口特征方面的选择较弱。然而,由于法律和社会环境仍然为同性伴侣带来独特的障碍,影响同性和异性伴侣决定同居和结婚的因素可能有所不同。研究人员在评估婚姻对健康和幸福的影响时,需要承认这些差异。

相似文献

1
Cohabitation and Marriage Among Same-Sex Couples in the 2019 ACS and CPS: A Research Note.
Demography. 2022 Oct 1;59(5):1595-1605. doi: 10.1215/00703370-10181474.
4
The Significance of Living Together and Importance of Marriage in Same-Sex Couples.
J Homosex. 2015;62(9):1241-63. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2015.1037137. Epub 2015 Apr 7.
5
Why are cohabiting relationships more violent than marriages?
Demography. 2006 Feb;43(1):127-40. doi: 10.1353/dem.2006.0007.
6
Same-Sex and Different-Sex Cohabiting Couple Relationship Stability.
Demography. 2016 Aug;53(4):937-53. doi: 10.1007/s13524-016-0490-x.
7
Pooling of Wealth in Marriage: The Role of Premarital Cohabitation.
Eur J Popul. 2022 Aug 9;38(4):721-754. doi: 10.1007/s10680-022-09627-2. eCollection 2022 Oct.
8
The Economic Foundations of Cohabiting Couples' Union Transitions.
Demography. 2018 Apr;55(2):535-557. doi: 10.1007/s13524-018-0651-1.
9
Income dynamics in couples and the dissolution of marriage and cohabitation.
Demography. 2007 Feb;44(1):159-79. doi: 10.1353/dem.2007.0005.
10
Committee Opinion No. 574: Marriage equality for same-sex couples.
Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Sep;122(3):729-32. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000433995.46087.cc.

引用本文的文献

1
Measurement opportunities for studying sexual and gender diverse partnerships in population-based surveys.
J Marriage Fam. 2024 Oct;86(5):1410-1431. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12957. Epub 2024 Jan 4.

本文引用的文献

2
It's complicated: The impact of marriage legalization among sexual minority women and gender diverse individuals in the United States.
Psychol Sex Orientat Gend Divers. 2020 Dec;7(4):396-406. doi: 10.1037/sgd0000375. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
3
Change in the Stability of First Premarital Cohabitation Among Women in the United States, 1983-2013.
Demography. 2019 Apr;56(2):427-450. doi: 10.1007/s13524-019-00765-7.
4
"His" and "Hers": Meeting the Economic Bar to Marriage.
Demography. 2018 Dec;55(6):2321-2343. doi: 10.1007/s13524-018-0726-z.
5
The Economic Foundations of Cohabiting Couples' Union Transitions.
Demography. 2018 Apr;55(2):535-557. doi: 10.1007/s13524-018-0651-1.
6
Mental Well-Being Differences in Cohabitation and Marriage: The Role of Childhood Selection.
J Marriage Fam. 2018 Feb;80(1):239-255. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12431. Epub 2017 Jul 24.
7
Trends in Cohabitation Outcomes: Compositional Changes and Engagement Among Never-Married Young Adults.
J Marriage Fam. 2014 Aug;76(4):826-842. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12123. Epub 2014 Jul 3.
8
Debt, cohabitation, and marriage in young adulthood.
Demography. 2014 Oct;51(5):1677-701. doi: 10.1007/s13524-014-0333-6.
9
Reassessing the Link between Women's Premarital Cohabitation and Marital Quality.
Soc Forces. 2012 Dec;91(2):435-662. doi: 10.1093/sf/sos126.
10
Re-Examining the Case for Marriage: Union Formation and Changes in Well-Being.
J Marriage Fam. 2012 Feb 1;74(1):1-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2011.00873.x. Epub 2012 Jan 11.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验