Suppr超能文献

新冠疫情:通过事件发生时间分析权衡各国的努力

COVID-19: Weighing the Endeavors of Nations, with Time to Event Analysis.

作者信息

Stephen Shine, Issac Alwin, Jacob Jaison, Vijay V R, Radhakrishnan Rakesh Vadakkethil, Krishnan Nadiya

机构信息

College of Nursing, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India.

出版信息

Osong Public Health Res Perspect. 2020 Aug;11(4):149-157. doi: 10.24171/j.phrp.2020.11.4.02.

Abstract

The cataclysmic COVID-19 pandemic erupted silently causing colossal impact worldwide, the repercussions of which indicated a lackadaisical vigilance in preparation for such a pandemic. This review assessed the measures taken by nations to contain this pandemic. A literature review was conducted using Medline, Google Scholar, Science Direct, Scopus, and WHO website. There were 8 nations (selected from the GHS index list) appraised for containment strategies. This was achieved by using mortality rate (per million) as the primary endpoint. The nations which were proactive, initiated scientific strategies earlier with rigor, appeared to have succeeded in containing the pandemic, although it is still too early to arbitrate a verdict. The so called "pandemic war" mandates international, interdisciplinary, and interdepartmental collaboration. Furthermore, building trust and confidence between the government and the public, having transparent communication, information sharing, use of advanced research-technology, and plentiful resources are required in the fight against COVID-19.

摘要

灾难性的新冠疫情悄然爆发,在全球造成了巨大影响,其影响表明在为应对此类大流行做准备方面缺乏应有的警惕。本综述评估了各国为遏制这一疫情所采取的措施。通过使用医学数据库(Medline)、谷歌学术、科学Direct、Scopus和世界卫生组织网站进行了文献综述。对8个国家(从全球卫生安全指数列表中选取)的疫情防控策略进行了评估。这是通过将死亡率(每百万人口)作为主要终点来实现的。那些积极主动、更早严格启动科学策略的国家,似乎已成功控制住了疫情,尽管现在做出定论还为时过早。这场所谓的“大流行战争”需要国际、跨学科和跨部门的合作。此外,在抗击新冠疫情的斗争中,还需要在政府与公众之间建立信任和信心,进行透明的沟通、信息共享,运用先进的研究技术,并拥有充足的资源。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5dc7/7442448/f4a00e6557a8/ophrp-11-149f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验