Evrard J, Doyon F, Acar J F, Salord J C, Mazas F, Flamant R
I.N.S.E.R.M., Clinique Chirurgicale Orthopédique, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France.
Int Orthop. 1988;12(1):69-73. doi: 10.1007/BF00265744.
The aim of this trial was to compare a 5-day course of cephazolin with a regimen of 2 days of cefamandole in 965 total hip replacements (488 in the cefamandole group and 477 in the cephazolin group). The effect of the prophylactic antibiotic on the bacterial colonization of drains (mean duration of drainage: 3.2 +/- 0.3 days) and on the susceptibility of colonizing organisms was assessed. No significant difference was observed in the percentage of infected drains between the two groups. The cefamandole group had a lower rate of Gram-negative organisms (23% versus 44%, p less than 0.01). The rate of deep infections within one year after operation was 0.7% in the cefamandole group versus 0.5% in the cephazolin group, and the difference is not significant. Cefamandole given for two days appears to be an effective prophylaxis against sepsis in total hip replacements.
本试验的目的是比较965例全髋关节置换术中头孢唑林5天疗程与头孢孟多2天疗程的效果(头孢孟多组488例,头孢唑林组477例)。评估了预防性抗生素对引流管细菌定植(平均引流持续时间:3.2±0.3天)及定植菌敏感性的影响。两组之间感染引流管的百分比无显著差异。头孢孟多组革兰阴性菌比例较低(23%对44%,p<0.01)。头孢孟多组术后1年内深部感染率为0.7%,头孢唑林组为0.5%,差异无统计学意义。给予两天的头孢孟多似乎是全髋关节置换术中预防败血症的有效方法。