School of Nursing Sydney, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia.
The Cunningham Centre for Palliative Care, St Vincent's Health Network Sydney, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia.
Gerontologist. 2022 Feb 9;62(2):e112-e122. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnaa118.
Human research ethics statements support the equitable inclusion of diverse groups. Yet older people are underrepresented in clinical research, especially those with impaired decision-making capacity. The aim of this study was to identify the perspectives and experiences of older persons and their caregivers of research participation with impaired decision-making capacity.
Scoping review of the literature and online sources in January-February 2019 (updated June 2020) according to Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews. English-language peer-reviewed research articles and Australian online narratives were included. Data were tabulated and narratively synthesized.
From 4,171 database records and 93 online resources, 22 articles (2000-2019, 82% United States, 16 first authors) and one YouTube webinar (2018) were initially included; updated searches yielded an additional article (2020) and YouTube webinar (2020). Studies were heterogeneous in terminology, methods, and foci, with hypothetical scenarios, quantitative analyses, and examination of proxy consent predominating. Participants (N = 7,331) were older persons (71%), caregivers of older persons with dementia/cognitive impairment (23%), and older persons with dementia/cognitive impairment (6%). Synthesis identified 2 themes: willingness to participate and decision-making approaches.
Research participation by older persons with dementia may be optimized through reducing risks and burdens and increasing benefits for participants, greater consumer input into study development, and shared and supported decision-making. Older persons' and caregivers' perspectives and experiences of research participation with impaired decision-making capacity require investigation in a greater range of countries and conditions other than dementia, and dissemination through more varied media.
人类研究伦理声明支持公平纳入不同群体。然而,老年人在临床研究中代表性不足,尤其是那些决策能力受损的老年人。本研究旨在确定有受损决策能力的老年人及其照顾者对参与研究的看法和经验。
根据乔安娜·布里格斯研究所(Joanna Briggs Institute)的方法和 PRISMA 扩展用于范围综述,于 2019 年 1 月至 2 月(2020 年 6 月更新)对文献和在线资源进行了范围综述。纳入了英语同行评议的研究文章和澳大利亚在线叙述。对数据进行了制表和叙述性综合。
从 4171 个数据库记录和 93 个在线资源中,最初纳入了 22 篇文章(2000-2019 年,82%来自美国,16 位第一作者)和一个 YouTube 网络研讨会(2018 年);更新搜索又产生了一篇文章(2020 年)和一个 YouTube 网络研讨会(2020 年)。研究在术语、方法和重点方面存在异质性,主要采用假设情景、定量分析和代理同意审查。参与者(N=7331)为老年人(71%)、痴呆/认知障碍老年人的照顾者(23%)和痴呆/认知障碍老年人(6%)。综合分析确定了 2 个主题:参与意愿和决策方法。
通过降低参与者的风险和负担,增加对参与者的利益,更多地让消费者参与研究的开发,以及共同支持决策,可以优化有受损决策能力的老年人参与研究。需要在更多国家和条件下(不限于痴呆症),通过更多不同的媒体来调查有受损决策能力的老年人及其照顾者对参与研究的看法和经验,并进行传播。