Department of Clinical Laboratory, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University (Fourth Military Medical University), Xi'an, China.
Department of Gynecology and Pediatric Tuberculosis, Xi'an Chest Hospital, Xi'an, China.
Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2020 Sep;124:101966. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2020.101966. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
QFT-Plus's newly added antigen elicited a specific CD8 T-cell response, which is closely related to active TB (ATB), and the IGRA based on Heparin-binding haemagglutinin (HBHA-IGRA) is a promising tool in latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) diagnosis. The objective of our study is to evaluate whether the combination of QFT-Plus and HBHA-IGRA can improve the diagnosis accuracy of ATB and LTBI.
135 healthcare workers (HCWs) and 57 patients with active pulmonary TB in a Chinese TB Hospital were recruited, HCWs underwent screening for LTBI using the QFT-Plus assay. Flow cytometry was used to analyze the distribution of peripheral blood T lymphocyte subsets in active TB patients with positive culture result. Then, the patients with ATB, individuals with LTBI and healthy TB-uninfected controls (HC) were tested by QFT-Plus and HBHA-IGRA respectively, and the efficiency of distinguishing LTBI from ATB by QFT-Plus and HBHA-IGRA were evaluated by Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves.
QFT-Plus TB2-TB1 which was positively correlated with CD8 T-cell response (r = 0.731, P < 0.001) in peripheral blood was significantly higher in ATB than LTBI and HC (median 0.47 IU/mL versus 0.02 IU/mL and 0.00 IU/mL, respectively; both P < 0.0001). While the HBHA-induced IFN-γ response did not differ between ATB and HC (median 12.12 pg/mL versus 10.95 pg/mL; P = 0.463), but was significantly higher in the LTBI (median 69.67 pg/mL; both P < 0.0001). The ROC area under the curve (AUC) for identifying ATB and LTBI was 0.769 (95% CI: 0.652-0.886; P = 0.0001) for QFT-Plus TB2-TB1, and 0.886 (95% CI:0.791-0.982; P<0.0001) for HBHA-IGRA. After combining the HBHA-IGRA with QFT-Plus results, the accuracy of identifying ATB and LTBI was improved to 85.7% from 74.3%.
HBHA-based IGRA better differentiates between LTBI and ATB compared to QFT-Plus CD8 T-cell response. In addition, combining HBHA-IGRA and QFT-Plus improves the accuracy of identifying tuberculosis disease status.
QFT-Plus 新添加的抗原引发了特定的 CD8 T 细胞反应,与活动性结核病(ATB)密切相关,基于肝素结合血红素(HBHA)的 IGRA 是潜伏性结核感染(LTBI)诊断的有前途的工具。本研究的目的是评估 QFT-Plus 和 HBHA-IGRA 的联合应用是否能提高 ATB 和 LTBI 的诊断准确性。
135 名医务人员(HCWs)和 57 名中国结核病医院活动性肺结核患者被招募,HCWs 接受 QFT-Plus 检测以筛查 LTBI。采用流式细胞术分析阳性培养结果的活动性肺结核患者外周血 T 淋巴细胞亚群分布。然后,对 ATB 患者、LTBI 患者和健康结核未感染对照(HC)分别进行 QFT-Plus 和 HBHA-IGRA 检测,通过受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评估 QFT-Plus 和 HBHA-IGRA 区分 LTBI 和 ATB 的效率。
QFT-Plus 外周血中与 CD8 T 细胞反应(r=0.731,P<0.001)呈正相关的 TB2-TB1 在 ATB 中显著高于 LTBI 和 HC(中位数 0.47 IU/mL 与 0.02 IU/mL 和 0.00 IU/mL,均 P<0.0001)。而 HBHA 诱导的 IFN-γ 反应在 ATB 和 HC 之间没有差异(中位数 12.12pg/mL 与 10.95pg/mL;P=0.463),但在 LTBI 中显著升高(中位数 69.67pg/mL;均 P<0.0001)。用于识别 ATB 和 LTBI 的 QFT-Plus TB2-TB1 的 ROC 曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.769(95%CI:0.652-0.886;P=0.0001),HBHA-IGRA 为 0.886(95%CI:0.791-0.982;P<0.0001)。将 HBHA-IGRA 与 QFT-Plus 结果相结合后,识别 ATB 和 LTBI 的准确性从 74.3%提高到 85.7%。
基于 HBHA 的 IGRA 比 QFT-Plus CD8 T 细胞反应更能区分 LTBI 和 ATB。此外,结合 HBHA-IGRA 和 QFT-Plus 可提高识别结核病疾病状态的准确性。