Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London.
Am J Psychiatry. 2020 Sep 1;177(9):811-817. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2020.20070998.
Causal pathways to disruptive behavior disorders, even within the same diagnostic category, are varied. Both equifinality and multifinality pose considerable challenges to uncovering underlying mechanisms and understanding varied developmental trajectories associated with disruptive behavior disorders. Uncovering genetic causes requires improved granularity in how we operationalize presentation and developmental trajectories associated with disruptive behavior disorders. If we want to integrate the study of genetic, environmental, and neurocognitive factors within a longitudinal framework, we need to improve measurement. Furthermore, brain changes associated with disruptive behavior disorders should not simply be understood as outcomes of genetic and environmental influences, but also as factors that reciprocally influence future social environments over time in ways that are important in contributing to risk and resilience. Advancing the field with regard to these challenges will result in more truly integrated investigation of disruptive behavior disorders, which holds the promise of improving our ability to develop more effective preventive and intervention approaches.
即使在同一诊断类别内,破坏性行为障碍的因果途径也各不相同。均衡终末和多终末都给揭示潜在机制和理解与破坏性行为障碍相关的不同发展轨迹带来了相当大的挑战。揭示遗传原因需要在我们操作与破坏性行为障碍相关的表现和发展轨迹的方式上提高粒度。如果我们想在纵向框架内整合遗传、环境和神经认知因素的研究,我们需要改进测量方法。此外,与破坏性行为障碍相关的大脑变化不应仅仅被理解为遗传和环境影响的结果,还应被理解为随着时间的推移,反过来影响未来社会环境的因素,这些因素在促成风险和恢复力方面非常重要。在这些挑战方面取得进展,将导致对破坏性行为障碍进行更真正的综合研究,从而有望提高我们开发更有效的预防和干预方法的能力。