• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用切尔诺贝利隔离区“红色森林”中的样本验证燃料颗粒溶解模型。

Validation of a fuel particle dissolution model with samples from the Red Forest within the Chernobyl exclusion zone.

机构信息

National University of Life and Environment Sciences (NUBiP of Ukraine), Ukraine; Centre for Environmental Radioactivity (CERAD CoE), Faculty of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, P.O. Box 5003, N-1432 Ås, Norway.

National University of Life and Environment Sciences (NUBiP of Ukraine), Ukraine; Centre for Environmental Radioactivity (CERAD CoE), Faculty of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, P.O. Box 5003, N-1432 Ås, Norway.

出版信息

J Environ Radioact. 2020 Nov;223-224:106387. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2020.106387. Epub 2020 Aug 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.jenvrad.2020.106387
PMID:32868094
Abstract

The contamination in the near exclusion zone of the Chernobyl nuclear power plant (ChNPP) with Sr, Pu and Am is associated with irradiated nuclear fuel particles. Fit for purpose models enabling long term prediction of mobility and bioavailability of particle-associated radionuclides are crucial for radiation protection of humans and the environment, as well as for planning of remediation measures and future land use. In the present work, a dynamic fuel particle dissolution model developed in 1999-2002 is described and validated using data based on sampling in 2015. The model is based on the characterization of the radionuclide source term of the waste in a shallow sub-surface radioactive waste storage, trench #22, in the Chernobyl Pilot Site (CPS) located in the Red Forest, 2.5 km west of the ChNPP, as well as the description of physical and chemical properties of the fuel particles and subsequent radionuclide leaching into the soil solution. Transformation rate constants of the fuel particle dissolution model related to topsoil, radioactive waste trench and submerged materials, and drained cooling pond sediments, should largely control the mobility and bioavailability of radionuclides (e.g., solubility in the soil, migration to groundwater and transfer to plants). The predicting power of the Chernobyl fuel particle dissolution model with respect to radionuclide leaching dynamics was validated using samples from the same experimental site, showing that predicted particle leaching and subsequent mobility and bioavailability were within 46 ± 3% of the observed data. Therefore, linking source- and release-scenario dependent characteristics of radioactive particles to their potential weathering can provide information that can be implemented in impact assessments models for existing contaminated areas as well as for future events.

摘要

切尔诺贝利核电站(ChNPP)近区的 Sr、Pu 和 Am 污染与辐照核燃料颗粒有关。适合目的的模型能够长期预测颗粒相关放射性核素的迁移性和生物可利用性,对于人类和环境的辐射防护、修复措施和未来土地利用规划至关重要。在本工作中,描述了 1999-2002 年开发的动态燃料颗粒溶解模型,并使用基于 2015 年采样的数据进行了验证。该模型基于浅层地下放射性废物储存中废物的放射性核素源项的特征,切尔诺贝利试验场(CPS)位于 ChNPP 以西 2.5 公里的红林,以及燃料颗粒的物理和化学性质的描述以及随后的放射性核素浸出到土壤溶液中。与表土、放射性废物沟和淹没材料以及排水冷却池沉积物相关的燃料颗粒溶解模型的转化速率常数,应在很大程度上控制放射性核素的迁移性和生物可利用性(例如,在土壤中的溶解度、向地下水的迁移和向植物的转移)。使用相同实验场地的样本验证了切尔诺贝利燃料颗粒溶解模型对放射性核素浸出动力学的预测能力,结果表明,预测的颗粒浸出及其随后的迁移性和生物可利用性在观察数据的 46±3%范围内。因此,将放射性颗粒的源和释放情景相关特性与它们的潜在风化联系起来,可以为现有污染区域的影响评估模型以及未来事件提供信息。

相似文献

1
Validation of a fuel particle dissolution model with samples from the Red Forest within the Chernobyl exclusion zone.用切尔诺贝利隔离区“红色森林”中的样本验证燃料颗粒溶解模型。
J Environ Radioact. 2020 Nov;223-224:106387. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2020.106387. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
2
Environmental behaviour of radioactive particles from chernobyl.切尔诺贝利放射性粒子的环境行为。
J Environ Radioact. 2019 Nov;208-209:106025. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2019.106025. Epub 2019 Aug 13.
3
Kinetics of fuel particle weathering and 90Sr mobility in the Chernobyl 30-km exclusion zone.切尔诺贝利30公里禁区内燃料颗粒风化及锶-90迁移的动力学
Health Phys. 1999 Mar;76(3):251-9. doi: 10.1097/00004032-199903000-00006.
4
Fuel particles in the Chernobyl cooling pond: current state and prediction for remediation options.切尔诺贝利冷却池中的燃料颗粒:当前状态及修复方案预测
J Environ Radioact. 2009 Apr;100(4):329-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2008.12.012. Epub 2009 Jan 30.
5
Kinetics of dissolution of Chernobyl fuel particles in soil in natural conditions.切尔诺贝利核燃料颗粒在自然条件下于土壤中的溶解动力学。
J Environ Radioact. 2004;72(3):335-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2003.08.002.
6
Solid-liquid distribution coefficients (Kd-s) of geological deposits at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant site with respect to Sr, Cs and Pu radionuclides: A short review.切尔诺贝利核电站地质沉积物中 Sr、Cs 和 Pu 放射性核素的固-液分配系数(Kd-s):简要回顾。
Chemosphere. 2020 Mar;242:125175. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125175. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
7
90Sr migration to the geo-sphere from a waste burial in the Chernobyl exclusion zone.90锶从切尔诺贝利禁区内的一个废物掩埋场向地圈的迁移。
J Environ Radioact. 2004;74(1-3):139-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2004.01.019.
8
High (36)Cl/Cl ratios in Chernobyl groundwater.切尔诺贝利地下水中高(36)Cl/Cl 比率。
J Environ Radioact. 2014 Dec;138:19-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2014.07.008. Epub 2014 Aug 15.
9
Investigation of Radionuclide Migration at Sites Adjacent to the 30-km Exclusion Zone of the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant.切尔诺贝利核电站 30 公里禁区周边地区放射性核素迁移的调查。
Health Phys. 2022 Apr 1;122(4):502-507. doi: 10.1097/HP.0000000000001529.
10
Impact of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) plantings on long term (137)Cs and (90)Sr recycling from a waste burial site in the Chernobyl Red Forest.苏格兰松(Pinus sylvestris L.)种植对切尔诺贝利红森林中一个废物掩埋场长期(137)铯和(90)锶再循环的影响。
J Environ Radioact. 2009 Dec;100(12):1062-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2009.05.003. Epub 2009 Jun 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Fukushima and Chernobyl: Similarities and Differences of Radiocesium Behavior in the Soil-Water Environment.福岛与切尔诺贝利:土壤-水环境中放射性铯行为的异同
Toxics. 2022 Sep 30;10(10):578. doi: 10.3390/toxics10100578.