Suppr超能文献

多巴胺激动剂对 2 型糖尿病成人代谢变量的影响:一项系统评价和随机临床试验的荟萃分析和序贯分析。

The effect of dopamine agonists on metabolic variables in adults with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review with meta analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized clinical trials.

机构信息

Department of Endocrinology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Diabetes Obes Metab. 2021 Jan;23(1):58-67. doi: 10.1111/dom.14183. Epub 2020 Sep 28.

Abstract

AIM

To assess the metabolic effects of dopamine agonists compared with placebo in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including adults with type 2 diabetes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eligible trials were identified by searching PubMed, Embase and CENTRAL. The primary outcomes were HbA1c and serious adverse events (SAEs) assessed at longest available follow-up. Secondary outcomes were fasting plasma glucose, adverse events, body weight, hypoglycaemia and triglycerides. We assessed risk of bias and evaluated the certainty of the evidence with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE).

RESULTS

Nine RCTs enrolling 3456 participants were included, six of which assessed the effect of bromocriptine, and the other three the effect of cabergoline. Dopamine agonists reduced HbA1c with 0.69 standardized mean difference (95% CI = 0.28 to 1.09; P = .0008; I = 80%; GRADE: low) compared with placebo. There was no difference in the effect between bromocriptine and cabergoline. Heterogeneity was partly explained by dosage and study duration, both of which were inversely associated with effect size. Only one large trial reported SAEs and no difference was reported for the risk of an SAE (RR = 0.89; 95% CI = 0.70 to 1.12; P = .32) between active intervention and placebo. Secondary outcomes suggested a decrease in fasting plasma glucose and triglycerides and no effect on the remaining outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Dopamine agonists reduce HbA1c as well as fasting plasma glucose and triglycerides in patients with type 2 diabetes without causing SAEs. These data are based on moderate to low quality evidence thus our confidence in the effect estimates is limited.

摘要

目的

评估随机对照试验(RCT)中与安慰剂相比,多巴胺激动剂在 2 型糖尿病成人中的代谢效应。

材料和方法

通过搜索 PubMed、Embase 和 CENTRAL 确定合格试验。主要结局是在最长随访时评估的糖化血红蛋白和严重不良事件(SAE)。次要结局是空腹血糖、不良事件、体重、低血糖和甘油三酯。我们评估了偏倚风险,并使用推荐评估、制定和评估(GRADE)对证据的确定性进行了评估。

结果

纳入了 9 项 RCT,共纳入 3456 名参与者,其中 6 项评估了溴隐亭的作用,另外 3 项评估了卡麦角林的作用。与安慰剂相比,多巴胺激动剂可使糖化血红蛋白降低 0.69 个标准化均数差值(95%CI=0.28 至 1.09;P=0.0008;I=80%;GRADE:低)。溴隐亭和卡麦角林之间的效果无差异。异质性部分由剂量和研究持续时间解释,这两者与效应大小呈反比。只有一项大型试验报告了 SAE,且活性干预与安慰剂之间 SAE 风险无差异(RR=0.89;95%CI=0.70 至 1.12;P=0.32)。次要结局表明空腹血糖和甘油三酯降低,而其余结局无影响。

结论

多巴胺激动剂可降低 2 型糖尿病患者的糖化血红蛋白和空腹血糖及甘油三酯,且不会导致 SAE。这些数据基于中等至低质量证据,因此我们对效应估计值的信心有限。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验