• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用思维导图在家庭会议中支持儿科和老年患者的共同决策。

Using Mind Mapping in Family Meetings to Support Shared Decision Making with Pediatric and Geriatric Patients.

机构信息

Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

Hebrew Senior Life, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Patient. 2020 Dec;13(6):709-717. doi: 10.1007/s40271-020-00447-2.

DOI:10.1007/s40271-020-00447-2
PMID:32870490
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Divergent objectives and narratives among members of a healthcare team may lead to suffering, underscoring the need to align patient care with the patient's self-identified priorities and goals. Shared decision making (SDM) with patients who may not be able to make healthcare decisions for themselves presents a unique challenge to healthcare providers, caregivers, and patients. Children and the elderly are two such groups where substituted decision making is often required. Family meetings, wherein stakeholders in a patient's care are gathered, present opportunities to align expectations and clinical goals. There is a clear need for a technique exploring all facets of the patient's story within the context of the biopsychosocial-spiritual model. We sought to promote narrative equity among stakeholders and maintain patient focus during family meetings. We describe the use of Mind Mapping in the family meeting to meet these objectives.

METHODS

Using two clinical scenarios, one involving a geriatric patient and another involving a pediatric patient, we describe the stepwise development of Mind Maps and how their use informed discussions among stakeholders in the family meeting.

RESULTS

Stakeholders found the Mind Maps easy to draw and helpful in eliciting their own priorities and preferences. Group exploration and refinement of the Mind Maps helped stakeholders to appreciate others' sometimes divergent perspectives, to ensure that the patient's voice was heard, and to ensure that care decisions were patient focused.

DISCUSSION

Mind Mapping was easily performed in two clinical scenarios, allowing the patient, family, and medical team to explore the biopsychosocial-spiritual model extensively, to appreciate each stakeholder's priorities, and to identify areas for further development. We have found that Mind Mapping helps define the 'topography' of relationships, prioritizes team discussions, finds shared interests in seemingly divergent objectives, and identifies which team member may best lead a discussion on a particular topic.

CONCLUSION

Mind Mapping may be a useful tool for family meetings, particularly for geriatric and pediatric patients with multiple stakeholders involved.

摘要

简介

医疗团队成员之间目标和叙述的分歧可能导致患者痛苦,这凸显了将患者护理与患者自我确定的优先事项和目标保持一致的必要性。与可能无法自行做出医疗决策的患者进行共同决策 (SDM) 给医疗保健提供者、护理人员和患者带来了独特的挑战。儿童和老年人就是这样两个需要替代决策的群体。在患者护理的利益相关者聚集的家庭会议中,存在着协调期望和临床目标的机会。在生物心理社会精神模型的背景下,探索患者故事的各个方面显然需要一种技术。我们试图在家庭会议中促进利益相关者之间的叙事公平并保持对患者的关注。我们描述了在家庭会议中使用思维导图来实现这些目标。

方法

使用两个临床场景,一个涉及老年患者,另一个涉及儿科患者,我们描述了思维导图的逐步开发以及它们在家庭会议中如何帮助利益相关者进行讨论。

结果

利益相关者发现思维导图易于绘制,并有助于引出他们自己的优先事项和偏好。对思维导图的集体探索和细化有助于利益相关者理解其他人有时不同的观点,确保患者的声音被听到,并确保护理决策以患者为中心。

讨论

思维导图在两个临床场景中都易于执行,允许患者、家属和医疗团队广泛探索生物心理社会精神模型,了解每个利益相关者的优先事项,并确定进一步发展的领域。我们发现思维导图有助于定义关系的“地形”,优先考虑团队讨论,在看似不同的目标中找到共同利益,并确定哪位团队成员可能最适合就特定主题进行讨论。

结论

思维导图可能是家庭会议的有用工具,特别是对于涉及多个利益相关者的老年和儿科患者。

相似文献

1
Using Mind Mapping in Family Meetings to Support Shared Decision Making with Pediatric and Geriatric Patients.运用思维导图在家庭会议中支持儿科和老年患者的共同决策。
Patient. 2020 Dec;13(6):709-717. doi: 10.1007/s40271-020-00447-2.
2
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.
3
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
4
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
5
Family meetings for older adults in intermediate care settings: the impact of patient cognitive impairment and other characteristics on shared decision making.中级护理机构中针对老年人的家庭会议:患者认知障碍及其他特征对共同决策的影响
Health Expect. 2015 Oct;18(5):1030-40. doi: 10.1111/hex.12076. Epub 2013 May 20.
6
Toward Shared Decision-Making in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study.迈向退行性颈椎脊髓病的共同决策:一项混合方法研究的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Oct 9;12:e46809. doi: 10.2196/46809.
7
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.卡塔尔国重症监护网络。
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):2. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.2. eCollection 2019.
8
A multimethod analysis of shared decision-making in hospice interdisciplinary team meetings including family caregivers.一项包括家庭护理人员在内的临终关怀跨学科团队会议中共同决策的多方法分析。
Palliat Med. 2016 Mar;30(3):270-8. doi: 10.1177/0269216315601545. Epub 2015 Aug 17.
9
Prevalence and predictors of shared decision-making in goals-of-care clinician-family meetings for critically ill neurologic patients: a multi-center mixed-methods study.重症神经疾病患者的临床医生-家庭治疗目标会议中共享决策的流行率及其预测因素:一项多中心混合方法研究。
Crit Care. 2023 Oct 21;27(1):403. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04693-2.
10
What do stakeholders need to implement shared decision making in routine cancer care? A qualitative needs assessment.利益相关者在常规癌症护理中实施共同决策需要什么?一项定性需求评估。
Acta Oncol. 2016 Dec;55(12):1484-1491. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2016.1227087. Epub 2016 Sep 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Mind Mapping Combined With Behavior Rating Scale on Medical Compliance Behavior of Atrial Fibrillation Patients Underwent Radiofrequency Ablation.思维导图联合行为评定量表对接受射频消融术的心房颤动患者医疗依从行为的影响
Brain Behav. 2025 Feb;15(2):e70332. doi: 10.1002/brb3.70332.
2
Refugee mothers' mental health in Denmark: possibilities and limits of home visiting programs.丹麦难民母亲的心理健康:家访项目的可能性与局限性
Arch Womens Ment Health. 2025 Apr;28(2):245-255. doi: 10.1007/s00737-024-01529-y. Epub 2024 Nov 19.
3
Physician-Scientists: Fixing the Leaking Pipeline - A Scoping Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Differences in physician communication when patients ask versus tell about religion/spirituality: a pilot study.当患者询问与主动谈及宗教/精神信仰时医生沟通方式的差异:一项初步研究。
Fam Med. 2015 Feb;47(2):138-42.
医生科学家:修复人才流失管道——一项范围综述
Med Sci Educ. 2022 Nov 2;32(6):1413-1424. doi: 10.1007/s40670-022-01658-y. eCollection 2022 Dec.
4
Patient Interaction Involving Older Adults: Provider vs. Caregiver Expectations.涉及老年人的患者互动:医疗服务提供者与护理人员的期望。
Geriatrics (Basel). 2022 Sep 17;7(5):101. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics7050101.
5
Systems Approaches to Occupational Vocal Health: Considerations for Community Faith Leaders.系统方法在职业嗓音健康中的应用:社区宗教领袖的考量。
J Relig Health. 2022 Apr;61(2):1183-1206. doi: 10.1007/s10943-021-01444-x. Epub 2021 Oct 25.