Suppr超能文献

1 型 Brugada 综合征患者队列中危及生命事件发生率低且难以预测侵袭性和非侵袭性症状标志物:GenBra 登记研究的数据和见解。

Low rate of life-threatening events and limitations in predicting invasive and noninvasive markers of symptoms in a cohort of type 1 Brugada syndrome patients: Data and insights from the GenBra registry.

机构信息

Instituto do Coração (InCor), Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020 Nov;31(11):2920-2928. doi: 10.1111/jce.14732. Epub 2020 Oct 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Brugada syndrome (BrS) has diagnostic challenges and controversial risk assessment. We aimed to investigate invasive and noninvasive parameters in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients from a Brazilian cohort of type-1 BrS.

METHODS

Patients with spontaneous and drug-induced type-1 BrS were classified into two groups, asymptomatic (n = 116, 84.1%) and symptomatic (n = 22, 15.9%; 13 with arrhythmogenic syncope, 9 with aborted sudden cardiac death). Genetic testing, EPS parameters, and electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 138 consecutive patients were eligible, 101 men (73.2%), mean 41.4 years, mostly probands (79%). Spontaneous pattern, observed in 77.5% of the patients, was associated with symptoms only if expressed in V1 and V2 standard position (not high precordial leads; p = .014). All symptomatic patients were probands. The presence of right ventricular outflow tract conduction delay (RVOTcd) signs, positive EPS, and SCN5A status was similar between symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects. During the mean 75-month follow-up, eight patients had appropriate therapies. All had spontaneous type-1 ECG pattern and 2/8 (25%) were asymptomatic, with positive EPS. The overall LAE incidence of 1.1% per year dropped to 0.27% in asymptomatic patients. RVOTcd occurred more frequently in SCN5A carriers (QRS-f 33.3% vs. 7.7%; p = .005, AVR sign 58.3% vs. 13.6%; p < .001; deep S in lead I 75% vs. 48.5%, p = .025%), as well as longer HV interval (66 vs. 49 ms; p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Spontaneous type-1 Brugada pattern in standard leads and proband status were more frequent in symptomatic subjects. RVOTcd, more common in SCN5A carriers, did not predict symptoms in BrS patients. EPS exhibited limited prognostic value for this low-risk population.

摘要

背景

Brugada 综合征(BrS)具有诊断挑战和有争议的风险评估。我们旨在研究来自巴西 1 型 BrS 队列的有症状和无症状患者的侵袭性和非侵袭性参数。

方法

将自发性和药物诱导的 1 型 BrS 患者分为两组,无症状组(n=116,84.1%)和有症状组(n=22,15.9%;13 例心律失常性晕厥,9 例心源性猝死)。分析基因检测、EPS 参数和心电图(ECG)参数。

结果

共纳入 138 例连续患者,101 例为男性(73.2%),平均年龄为 41.4 岁,主要为先证者(79%)。77.5%的患者出现自发性模式,仅当 V1 和 V2 标准导联(非高位前导联)出现时,与症状相关(p=0.014)。所有有症状的患者均为先证者。右心室流出道传导延迟(RVOTcd)表现、EPS 阳性和 SCN5A 状态在有症状和无症状患者之间相似。在平均 75 个月的随访期间,8 例患者接受了适当的治疗。所有患者均有自发性 1 型 ECG 模式,其中 2/8(25%)为无症状,EPS 阳性。每年 1.1%的总体左房扩大发生率在无症状患者中降至 0.27%。SCN5A 携带者中 RVOTcd 更为常见(QRS-f 33.3% vs. 7.7%;p=0.005,AVR 征 58.3% vs. 13.6%;p<0.001;导联 I 中深 S 波 75% vs. 48.5%,p=0.025),HV 间期也较长(66ms vs. 49ms;p<0.001)。

结论

标准导联中自发性 1 型 Brugada 模式和先证者状态在有症状患者中更为常见。RVOTcd 在 SCN5A 携带者中更为常见,但不能预测 BrS 患者的症状。EPS 对这个低风险人群的预后价值有限。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验