Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 23, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia.
Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 23, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia; Research Centre of Applied and Preventive Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Turku, Turku FIN-20520, Finland; Centre for Population Health Research, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku FIN-20520, Finland.
J Affect Disord. 2020 Nov 1;276:511-518. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.07.048. Epub 2020 Jul 18.
Prospective studies on youth diet and mood disorders outcomes are limited. We examined if youth diet quality was associated with mood disorder onset over a 25-year follow-up period.
In 1985, Australian participants (aged 10-15 years) completed a 24-hour food record. A validated 100-point Dietary Guidelines Index (DGI) assessed diet quality. In 2009-11, 1005 participants (aged 33-41 years) completed the lifetime Composite International Diagnostic Interview for age of first DSM-IV defined mood disorder (depression or dysthymia). Cox proportional hazards regression estimated hazard of mood disorder during the 25-year follow-up according to baseline DGI score. Sensitivity analyses censored the study at 5, 10, and 15 years after baseline and used log binomial regression to estimate relative risk (RR). Covariates included baseline negative affect, BMI, academic performance, smoking, breakfast eating, physical activity, and socioeconomic status.
The mean(SD) youth DGI score was 45.0(11.5). A 10-point higher DGI was not associated with hazard of mood disorder onset over the 25-year follow-up (Hazard Ratio (HR):1.00; 95% Confidence Interval (CI):0.89-1.13). The only indication that higher DGI might be associated with lower risk of mood disorder was within the first 5 years after baseline and this was not statistically significant (RR=0.85; 95% CI:0.60-1.18).
Loss-to-follow-up. A single 24-hour food record may not represent usual diet.
Youth diet did not predict mood disorders in adulthood. The suggestions of a lower risk of mood disorder during late adolescence highlights that further prospective studies are needed.
关于青年饮食与心境障碍结局的前瞻性研究有限。我们研究了在 25 年的随访期间,青年饮食质量是否与心境障碍发病有关。
1985 年,澳大利亚参与者(年龄 10-15 岁)完成了 24 小时食物记录。经过验证的 100 分饮食指南指数(DGI)评估了饮食质量。2009-11 年,1005 名参与者(年龄 33-41 岁)完成了首次 DSM-IV 定义的心境障碍(抑郁症或恶劣心境)的终生综合国际诊断访谈。Cox 比例风险回归根据基线 DGI 评分估计 25 年随访期间心境障碍的发病风险。敏感性分析将研究截止到基线后 5、10 和 15 年,并使用对数二项式回归估计相对风险(RR)。协变量包括基线负性情绪、BMI、学业成绩、吸烟、早餐摄入、身体活动和社会经济地位。
青年 DGI 的平均(SD)得分是 45.0(11.5)。DGI 每增加 10 分与 25 年随访期间心境障碍发病风险无关(风险比(HR):1.00;95%置信区间(CI):0.89-1.13)。唯一表明较高 DGI 可能与心境障碍风险较低相关的是在基线后前 5 年,但这并不具有统计学意义(RR=0.85;95%CI:0.60-1.18)。
随访丢失。单次 24 小时食物记录可能无法代表常规饮食。
青年饮食不能预测成年后的心境障碍。青少年晚期心境障碍风险较低的提示强调需要进一步进行前瞻性研究。