Choi Hyo Geun, Soh Jae Seung, Lim Jae Sung, Sim Song Yong, Jung Yoon Jung, Lee Suk Woo
Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.
Hallym Data Science Laboratory.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Aug 14;99(33):e21703. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021703.
Studies have shown that peptic ulcer disease (PUD) increases the risk of dementia via the mechanism of systemic inflammation. We examined the association between PUD and the risk of dementia using a population-based national sample cohort from South Korea.Using the national cohort study from the Korean National Health Insurance Service, we extracted data for patients with dementia (n = 11,434) and for 1:4 matched control participants (n = 45,736) and then analyzed the previous histories of PUD from 2002 to 2013 using conditional logistic regression analyses. The controls were matched to the patients according to age, sex, income, region of residence, and past medical history. Subgroup analyses were performed based on age and sex.There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of PUD between the dementia and control groups (18.0% vs 17.4%, P = .107). The adjusted odds ratio (OR) for PUD was 0.92 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.88-0.97, P = .002). In the subgroup analysis based on age, the adjusted ORs for PUD were 0.93 (95% CI = 0.88-0.99) in the <80-year-old group and 0.90 (95% CI = 0.82-1.00) in the ≥80-year-old group (each P < .05). In the subgroup analysis based on sex, the adjusted ORs for PUD were 0.89 (95% CI = 0.81-0.97; P < .05) in men and 0.94 (95% CI = 0.89-1.00; P = .06) in women.PUD does not increase the risk of dementia at any age or in either sex after adjusting for age and the history of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, ischemic heart disease, stroke, and depression.
研究表明,消化性溃疡疾病(PUD)通过全身炎症机制增加患痴呆症的风险。我们使用韩国基于人群的全国样本队列研究,来检验PUD与痴呆症风险之间的关联。
利用韩国国民健康保险服务中心的全国队列研究,我们提取了痴呆症患者(n = 11434)和1:4匹配的对照参与者(n = 45736)的数据,然后使用条件逻辑回归分析,分析了2002年至2013年期间PUD的既往病史。对照组根据年龄、性别、收入、居住地区和既往病史与患者进行匹配。根据年龄和性别进行亚组分析。
痴呆症组和对照组之间PUD的发病率没有统计学上的显著差异(18.0%对17.4%,P = 0.107)。PUD的调整优势比(OR)为0.92(95%置信区间[CI] = 0.88 - 0.97,P = 0.002)。在基于年龄的亚组分析中,<80岁组PUD的调整OR为0.93(95% CI = 0.88 - 0.99),≥80岁组为0.90(95% CI = 0.82 - 1.00)(各P < 0.05)。在基于性别的亚组分析中,男性PUD的调整OR为0.89(95% CI = 0.81 -